scholarly journals Determinants of nursing home choice: Does reported quality matter?

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 766-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik Schmitz ◽  
Magdalena A. Stroka‐Wetsch
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 1212-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn M. Schapira ◽  
Judy A. Shea ◽  
Katia A. Duey ◽  
Carly Kleiman ◽  
Rachel M. Werner

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Jeanne Hill
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 981-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hari Sharma ◽  
Marcelo Coca Perraillon ◽  
Rachel M. Werner ◽  
David C. Grabowski ◽  
R. Tamara Konetzka

We provide empirical evidence on the relative importance of specific observable factors that can explain why individuals enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid (duals) are concentrated in lower quality nursing homes, relative to those not on Medicaid. Descriptive results show that duals are 9.7 percentage points more likely than nonduals to be admitted to a low-quality (1-2 stars) nursing home. Using the Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition approach in a multivariate framework, we find that 35.4% of the difference in admission to low-quality nursing homes can be explained by differences in the distribution of observable characteristics. Differences in education and distance to high-quality nursing homes are important drivers, as are health status and race. Our findings highlight the need for creative policy solutions targeting the modifiable factors to reduce the disparity.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 899-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie‐Louise Leroux ◽  
Gregory Ponthiere

1980 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald L. Schow ◽  
Michael A. Nerbonne

In the February 1980 issue of this journal, the report by Ronald L. Schow and Michael A. Nerbonne ("Hearing Levels Among Elderly Nursing Home Residents") contains an error. On page 128, the labels "Male" and "Female" in Table 2 should be reversed.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
Mark Kander
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document