scholarly journals Effectiveness of tax credits for health insurance premium: Evidence from the health insurance tax credit

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1609-1616
Author(s):  
Dajung Jun
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Insurance Premium ◽  
Tax Credits ◽  
Tax Credit ◽  
Health Insurance Premium ◽  
Insurance Tax

Private Purchasing Pools to Harness Individual Tax Credits for Consumers

2001 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Curtis ◽  
Edward Neuschler ◽  
Rafe Forland
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Significant Contribution ◽  
Tax Credits ◽  
Health Plans ◽  
Tax Credit ◽  
Administrative Costs ◽  
Large Employer ◽  
Health Rating ◽  
Insurance Tax ◽  
Small Employers

While health insurance tax credits could help people who otherwise could not afford to purchase coverage, many might still find individual coverage too expensive and its marketplace dynamics bewildering. As an alternative, this paper outlines an approach using private purchasing pools for tax-credit recipients. The objective is to offer these individuals and families a choice among competing health plans, and provide many of the same advantages enjoyed by workers in large employer groups, such as relatively low administrative costs, no health rating, and an effective “sponsor.” Some express optimism that private pools will emerge naturally and thrive as an option for individual tax-credit recipients. However, adverse selection and other individual health insurance market forces make this a dubious prospect. The approach presented here gives purchasing pools the same tool employer groups use to maintain stability and cohesion—a significant contribution that cannot be used elsewhere. The ability to offer health plans exclusive access to a sizable new, previously uninsured clientele—tax-credit recipients—would enable purchasing pools to attract health plan participation and thus overcome one major reason several state-directed pools for small employers have failed. To avoid other pitfalls, the paper also suggests private pool structures, as well as federal and state roles that seek to balance objectives for market innovation and choice with those for coverage-source stability and efficiency.

A Health Insurance Tax Credit for Uninsured Workers

2001 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Zelenak
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Health Insurance Coverage ◽  
Tax Credits ◽  
Tax Credit ◽  
Poverty Level ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Insurance Tax ◽  
Age And Sex

This paper describes a new system of tax credits to help low-income workers pay for health insurance. The system would be designed to subsidize health insurance coverage for workers who are currently uninsured, or who pay high premiums for nongroup insurance. Anyone age 19 or older who is not covered by Medicaid, Medicare, or employer-sponsored health insurance would be eligible for a health insurance tax credit (HITC), administered through the Internal Revenue Service. The base amount of the proposed credit would be $2,000 per year for each covered individual, but this amount would be adjusted for the individual's age and sex, according to the effect of age and sex on the cost of insurance coverage. The base amount of the credit would be reduced by $150 for every $1,000 by which a person's income exceeded 200% of the federal poverty level, thus limiting HITC eligibility to lower-income workers. To encourage participation in the credit program, most of the credit would be available through an advance payment system, with final reconciliation after year's end.

scholarly journals Public Subsidies for Employees' Contributions to Employer-Sponsored Insurance

2001 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Merlis
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Tax Credits ◽  
Public Subsidies ◽  
Low Income Families ◽  
Employee Premium Contributions ◽  
Premium Contributions ◽  
Insurance Tax ◽  
Fair Balance

Proposals to provide or subsidize health insurance for low-income families must take account of the fact that many workers have access to employer-sponsored insurance (ESI), but decline it because of required employee premium contributions. This article considers a tax credit for the employee share of ESI in the context of a broader program of income-based health insurance tax credits. Helping uninsured workers pay for available ESI could be more cost-effective than subsidizing their coverage in the nongroup market. The credit would also be available to workers who were already covered, both for equity reasons and to reduce the incentives for employers to drop coverage or for workers to shift to subsidized individual plans. One key issue is how to prevent employers from reducing their current health plan contributions to take advantage of the new funding. Other design questions considered by the article include whether workers should be able to choose between ESI and nongroup coverage, whether minimum benefit standards should apply for employer plans, and how to achieve a fair balance in subsidies for group and nongroup coverage.

scholarly journals The Effect of Medical Test to Belief Updating and Willingness to Pay for Health Insurance Premium: Evidences from Laboratory Experiment

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-51
Author(s):  
Restiatun Massardi ◽  
Artidiatun Adji ◽  
Rimawan Pradiptyo
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Willingness To Pay ◽  
Insurance Premium ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Belief Updating ◽  
Medical Tests ◽  
Health Insurance Premium ◽  
Posterior Belief

Purpose: The objective of this study is to analyze the effect of the results of medical tests on three health indicators, i.e. blood pressure, cholesterol level, and blood glucose level, for belief updating and willingness to pay for health insurance. Specifically, this study examined whether individuals update their belief on their health status after being informed the results of their medical tests. This study also investigated whether there is a significant difference between the willingness to pay for the individuals who were informed about the results of their medical tests and of individuals who were not informed about the results of their medical tests. Approach: This study utilizes laboratory experiments. There are two groups in the experiments: the treatment group and the control group. The individuals in the treatment group receive information on the results of the medical tests which cover blood pressure, glucose level and cholesterol level tests. The individuals in the control group do not receive any information. We compare the willingness to pay between the treatment group and the control group. Results: There are significant differences in the value of willingness to pay for health insurance premium based on prior belief (individuals’ belief prior to the medical tests) and on posterior belief (individuals’ belief after the medical tests) between control group and treatment group. Belief updating occurs when there is a difference between prior belief and posterior belief due the presence of an event. Value: This work contributes to the better understanding about the individual decision making on health insurance purchase. Conclusion: The medical tests on blood pressure, cholesterol level, and glucose level significantly affect the willingness to pay for health insurance premium. There are significant changes in individual’s posterior belief due to the information provided by the medical tests. An individual’s willingness to pay for health insurance premium may change due to a change in his or her health status belief.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document