scholarly journals Development of an Alliance Supporting Native American and Alaska Native Graduate Students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (187) ◽  
pp. 19-28
Author(s):  
Jerry R. McMurtry
Keyword(s):  
Native American ◽  
Graduate Students ◽  
Alaska Native ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
And Mathematics

scholarly journals Does Latinx Representation Matter for Latinx Student Retention in STEM?

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blanca E. Rincón
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Student Retention ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Stem Students ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
The University ◽  
The Relationship

Using student-level data, this study explores the relationship between Latinx student representation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and student retention. Results revealed that a 1% increase in cohort-level Latinx student representation in STEM subfields is associated with a decrease in student departures from the university, but not STEM. Furthermore, Latinx STEM students may be more responsive to changes in the representation of their cohorts compared with increases in diversity for upper-division undergraduate or graduate students.

scholarly journals Doctoral Advisor-Advisee Pairing in STEM Fields: Selection Criteria and Impact of Faculty, Student and Departmental Factors

10.28945/2302 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 343-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simy Joy ◽  
Xiang Fen Liang ◽  
Diana Bilimoria ◽  
Susan Perry
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Career Stage ◽  
American University ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Time Of Admission

Unlike the doctoral programs in places where students are paired with advisors at the time of admission itself, most US programs require the students to choose their advisors, and the advisors to formally accept the students as advisees. Little research has been done to understand how students and faculty approach this mutual selection and pairing process. This paper examines this process in STEM departments (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics), with specific focus on factors influencing the decisions. Based on focus groups and interviews of doctoral students and faculty from STEM departments in an American university, we identify criteria applied by students and faculty in making their choices. Students were found to assess faculty on available funding, area of research, personality, ability to graduate students fast, and career prospects for students, and faculty to assess students on their qualifications/credentials and perceived ability to contribute to research. We also found that this mutual assessment was not objective, but influenced by perceptions associated with faculty gender and career stage, and student nationality. In the end, whether students and faculty were actually paired with persons of their choice depended on departmental factors including prevalent pairing practices, restrictions on student numbers per faculty, and reward structure. We discuss implications of the findings for research and practice.

Crowd-Funding for Inspiring Graduate Students to Educate K12 Students About STEM

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Taylor ◽  
Suresh K. Sitaraman
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Electronic Packaging ◽  
Teachable Moment ◽  
Teachable Moments ◽  
Georgia Institute ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Stem Career ◽  
Institute Of Technology ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
K 12

Often when people who are not in the field hear about electronic packaging, they immediately presume that it is exclusive to electrical engineering; however, electronic packaging has opportunities for many different Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) areas. Many projects in micro- and nanotechnology are interdisciplinary in nature, and thus, a broad background of various disciplines is needed to conduct research and development in these areas. At the Georgia Institute of Technology, an initiative called the Meindl Legacy project has been created to use crowd funding to help graduate students in the nanotechnology area to create “teachable moments.” The intention of the teachable moment is to broaden the research to younger audiences, so that they are inspired to take the necessary background classes needed to pursue a STEM career path. The use of crowd-funding allows for industry partners and the general public to become involved with research that is currently ongoing at the Georgia Institute of Technology and to educate K-12 students. The “teachable moment” outlined in this paper was created to demonstrate how different materials’ coefficients of thermal expansion can affect the interfaces and potentially lead to cracking damage in an electronic package.

scholarly journals We need to address ableism in science

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 507-510
Author(s):  
Raven J. Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
The United States ◽  
Academic Science ◽  
Stem Fields ◽  
Disabled People ◽  
Unique Problem ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
And Mathematics

In science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, disabled people remain a significantly underrepresented part of the workforce. Recent data suggests that about 20% of undergraduates in the United States have disabilities, but representation in STEM fields is consistently lower than in the general population. Of those earning STEM degrees, only about 10% of undergraduates, 6% of graduate students, and 2% of doctoral students identify as disabled. This suggests that STEM fields have difficulty recruiting and retaining disabled students, which ultimately hurts the field, because disabled scientists bring unique problem-solving perspectives and input. This essay briefly explores the ways in which ableism—prejudice against disabled people based on the assumption that they are “less than” their nondisabled peers—in research contributes to the exclusion of disabled scientists and suggests ways in which the scientific community can improve accessibility and promote the inclusion of disabled scientists in academic science.

scholarly journals Rejecting Unwanted Romantic Advances Is More Difficult Than Suitors Realize

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1102-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa K. Bohns ◽  
Lauren A. DeVincent
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Women In Stem ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Difficult Position ◽  
And Mathematics

In two preregistered studies, we find that initiators of unrequited romantic advances fail to appreciate the difficult position their targets occupy, both in terms of how uncomfortable it is for targets to reject an advance and how targets’ behavior is affected, professionally and otherwise, because of this discomfort. We find the same pattern of results in a survey of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) graduate students ( N = 942) who recalled actual instances of unwanted or unrequited romantic pursuit (Study 1) and in an experiment in which participants ( N = 385) were randomly assigned to the roles of “target” or “suitor” when reading a vignette involving an unwanted romantic advance made by a coworker (Study 2). Notably, women in our Study 1 sample of STEM graduate students were more than twice as likely to report having been in the position of target as men; thus, our findings have potential implications for the retention of women in STEM.

scholarly journals From community data to research archive: Partnering to increase and sustain capacity within a native organization

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Page-Reeves ◽  
Ananda Marin ◽  
Molly Bleecker ◽  
Maurice Leon Moffett ◽  
Kathy DeerInWater ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Native American ◽  
Research Collaboration ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Community Capacity ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Strategic Design ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Community Data ◽  
Native Organization ◽  
And Mathematics

Community engagement and participation in academic research is growing in popularity and acceptance. Communities are now routinely engaged and participate in academic research design, implementation and interpretation, but the capacity of communities to conduct their own research is not always a product of these engagement initiatives. This article describes a collaboration between an organisation that supports Native American participation in the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and university researchers to expand the organisation’s capacity to conduct research by creating a searchable database from their organisational records. We discuss how strategic design of a research collaboration can result in infrastructure development that contributes to community capacity.

From SMET to STEM at MTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 7-8
Author(s):  
Tom Drake ◽  
Tim McGeehan
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Graduate Students ◽  
Naval Research ◽  
International Forum ◽  
Diverse Workforce ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Office Of Naval Research ◽  
Marine Technology ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Valuable Role

Abstract The Student Poster Competition (SPC) has been an integral component of OCEANS meetings since 1989. This enduring program continues to play a valuable role in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education and professional development, providing an international forum for undergraduate and graduate students to showcase their efforts and interact with future colleagues, mentors, and employers. As a sponsor of the SPC since 1999, the Office of Naval Research (ONR) relies on programs like SPC to help inspire, foster, and develop talent across the diverse workforce needed to address the complex marine technology challenges of today and tomorrow.

scholarly journals Progress and problems of gender equality in Japanese academics and geosciences

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 195-203
Author(s):  
Rie S. Hori
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Graduate Students ◽  
Gender Equality ◽  
Graduate School ◽  
Academic Staff ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Unconscious Bias ◽  
Public Attention ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
And Mathematics

Abstract. In its gender equality status, Japan lags behind the European Union (EU) and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. Only 16.7 % of academic staff in national universities are women. Although there has been a slow improvement during the last 45 years, the percentage of female staff remains particularly low in the STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) fields. In 2018, female stuff accounted for only 12.3 % in agriculture, 8.7 % in science, and 6.2 % in engineering. The number of female graduate students and the number of female members of the Japanese geoscience societies have been steadily increasing since the 1998 campaign that increased the total number of graduate school places. However, low representation of females in academic job positions, as well as among the recipients of academic awards, suggests that a strong unconscious bias against women still exists in Japan. Continuing public attention to these issues is essential for the improvement of the situation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document