scholarly journals Detection and management of hyperactive and hypoactive delirium in older patients during hospitalization: a retrospective cohort study evaluating daily practice

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 1521-1529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eveline L. van Velthuijsen ◽  
Sandra M.G. Zwakhalen ◽  
Wubbo J. Mulder ◽  
Frans R.J. Verhey ◽  
Gertrudis I.J.M. Kempen
Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 446
Author(s):  
Laura Soldevila-Boixader ◽  
Bernat Villanueva ◽  
Marta Ulldemolins ◽  
Eva Benavent ◽  
Ariadna Padulles ◽  
...  

Background: Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (DEP) is a rare but severe adverse effect and the risk factors are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for DEP. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at the Bone and Joint Infection Unit of the Hospital Universitari Bellvitge (January 2014–December 2018). To identify risk factors for DEP, cases were divided into two groups: those who developed DEP and those without DEP. Results: Among the whole cohort (n = 229) we identified 11 DEP cases (4.8%) and this percentage almost doubled in the subgroup of patients ≥70 years (8.1%). The risk factors for DEP were age ≥70 years (HR 10.19, 95%CI 1.28–80.93), therapy >14 days (7.71, 1.98–30.09) and total cumulative dose of daptomycin ≥10 g (5.30, 1.14–24.66). Conclusions: Clinicians should monitor cumulative daptomycin dosage to minimize DEP risk, and be cautious particularly in older patients when the total dose of daptomycin exceeds 10 g.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e042351
Author(s):  
Kathryn Eastwood ◽  
Dhanya Nambiar ◽  
Rosamond Dwyer ◽  
Judy A Lowthian ◽  
Peter Cameron ◽  
...  

BackgroundMost calls to ambulance result in emergency ambulance dispatch (direct dispatch) following primary telephone triage. Ambulance Victoria uses clinician-led secondary telephone triage for patients identified as low-acuity during primary triage to refer them to alternative care pathways; however, some are returned for ambulance dispatch (secondary dispatch). Older adult patients are frequent users of ambulance services; however, little is known about the appropriateness of subsequent secondary dispatches.ObjectivesTo examine the appropriateness of secondary dispatch through a comparison of the characteristics and ambulance outcomes of older patients dispatched an emergency ambulance via direct or secondary dispatch.DesignA retrospective cohort study of ambulance patient data between September 2009 and June 2012 was conducted.SettingThe secondary telephone triage service operated in metropolitan Melbourne, Victoria, Australia during the study period.ParticipantsThere were 90 086 patients included aged 65 years and over who had an emergency ambulance dispatch via direct or secondary dispatch with one of the five most common secondary dispatch paramedic diagnoses.Main outcome measuresDescriptive analyses compared characteristics, treatment and transportation rates between direct and secondary dispatch patients.ResultsThe dispatch groups were similar in demographics, vital signs and hospital transportation rates. However, secondary dispatch patients were half as likely to be treated by paramedics (OR 0.51; CI 0.48 to 0.55; p<0.001). Increasing age was associated with decreasing treatment (p<0.005) and increasing transportation rates (p<0.005).ConclusionSecondary triage could identify patients who would ultimately be transported to an emergency department. However, the lower paramedic treatment rates suggest many secondary dispatch patients may have been suitable for referral to alternative low-acuity transport or referral options.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1377-1384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshito Hayashi ◽  
Tsutomu Nishida ◽  
Shusaku Tsutsui ◽  
Takashi Ohta ◽  
Shinjiro Yamaguchi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 15 ◽  
pp. 1419-1425
Author(s):  
Yifeng Qian ◽  
Huiting Yu ◽  
Weijun Yuan ◽  
Jiaqing Wu ◽  
Qingyu Xu ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 833-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haoda Fu ◽  
Bradley H. Curtis ◽  
Dara P. Schuster ◽  
Andreas Festa ◽  
David M. Kendall

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 1292-1301
Author(s):  
Yongtak Cho ◽  
Yongil Cho ◽  
Hyuk Joong Choi ◽  
Heekyung Lee ◽  
Tae Ho Lim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Chaomin Wu ◽  
Xianglin Hu ◽  
Jianxin Song ◽  
Chunling Du ◽  
Jie Xu ◽  
...  

AbstractImportanceHeart injury can be easily induced by viral infection such as adenovirus and enterovirus. However, whether coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes heart injury and hereby impacts mortality has not yet been fully evaluated.ObjectiveTo explore whether heart injury occurs in COVID-19 on admission and hereby aggravates mortality later.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA single-center retrospective cohort study including 188 COVID-19 patients admitted from December 25, 2019 to January 27, 2020 in Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital, China; follow up was completed on February 11, 2020.ExposuresHigh levels of heart injury indicators on admission (hs-TNI; CK; CK-MB; LDH; α-HBDH).Main Outcomes and MeasuresMortality in hospital and days from admission to mortality (survival days).ResultsOf 188 patients with COVID-19, the mean age was 51.9 years (standard deviation: 14.26; range: 21∼83 years) and 119 (63.3%) were male. Increased hs-TnI levels on admission tended to occur in older patients and patients with comorbidity (especially hypertension). High hs-TnI on admission (≥ 6.126 pg/mL), even within the clinical normal range (0∼28 pg/mL), already can be associated with higher mortality. High hs-TnI was associated with increased inflammatory levels (neutrophils, IL-6, CRP, and PCT) and decreased immune levels (lymphocytes, monocytes, and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells). CK was not associated with mortality. Increased CK-MB levels tended to occur in male patients and patients with current smoking. High CK-MB on admission was associated with higher mortality. High CK-MB was associated with increased inflammatory levels and decreased lymphocytes. Increased LDH and α-HBDH levels tended to occur in older patients and patients with hypertension. Both high LDH and α-HBDH on admission were associated with higher mortality. Both high LDH and α-HBDH were associated with increased inflammatory levels and decreased immune levels. hs-TNI level on admission was negatively correlated with survival days (r= -0.42, 95% CI= -0.64∼-0.12, P=0.005). LDH level on admission was negatively correlated with survival days (r= -0.35, 95% CI= -0.59∼-0.05, P=0.022).Conclusions and RelevanceHeart injury signs arise in COVID-19, especially in older patients, patients with hypertension and male patients with current smoking. COVID-19 virus might attack heart via inducing inflammatory storm. High levels of heart injury indicators on admission are associated with higher mortality and shorter survival days. COVID-19 patients with signs of heart injury on admission must be early identified and carefully managed by cardiologists, because COVID-19 is never just confined to respiratory injury.Key pointsQuestionDoes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cause heart injury and hereby impact mortality?FindingsIn this retrospective cohort study including 188 patients with COVID-19, patients with high levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-TNI) on admission had significantly higher mortality (50.0%) than patients with moderate or low levels of hs-TNI (10.0% or 9.1%). hs-TNI level on admission was significantly negatively correlated with survival days (r= -0.42, 95% CI= -0.64∼-0.12, P=0.005).MeaningCOVID-19 patients with signs of heart injury on admission must be early identified and carefully managed by cardiologists, in order to maximally prevent or rescue heart injury-related mortality in COVID-19.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiren He ◽  
Haijing Hou ◽  
Difei Zhang ◽  
Yenan Mo ◽  
La Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The optimal choice of treatment, with hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD), for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, is still controversial. Only a few studies comparing HD and PD have been conducted in China, which has the largest number of dialysis patients in the world. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on ESRD patients who began renal replacement treatment from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017 in Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine. Propensity scoring match was applied to balance the baseline conditions and multivariate Cox regression analysis to compare the mortality between HD and PD patients, and evaluated the correlation between mortality and various baseline characteristics. Results A total of 436 HD patients and 501 PD patients were included in this study, and PD patients had better survival than HD patients, but the difference was not statistically significant. For younger ESRD patients (≤60-year-old), the overall survival of PD was better than that of HD, but HD was associated with a lower risk of death in older patients (> 70-year-old). This difference was still significant after adjustment for a variety of confounding factors. Female gender, age at dialysis initiation, cardiovascular disease, cholesterol, and HD were risk factors of all-cause mortality in the younger subgroup, while PD was risk factor in the older subgroup. Conclusion PD may be a better choice for younger ESRD patients, and HD for the older patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document