Consolidation grouting using horizontal directional drilling technology in the Praga district of Warsaw prior to TBM tunnelling

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Barbanti ◽  
Marco Bonanno ◽  
Andrea Rigazio
Keyword(s):  
Directional Drilling ◽  
Horizontal Directional Drilling ◽  
Drilling Technology

Evaluation of utilizing horizontal directional drilling technology for ground source heat pumps

Geothermics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 101769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeid Mohammadzadeh Bina ◽  
Hikari Fujii ◽  
Shunsuke Tsuya ◽  
Hiroyuki Kosukegawa ◽  
Shigemi Naganawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Pumps ◽  
Directional Drilling ◽  
Horizontal Directional Drilling ◽  
Ground Source Heat Pumps ◽  
Ground Source ◽  
Drilling Technology

scholarly journals Introducing Bentonite into the Environment in the Construction Stage of Linear Underground Investment Using the HDD Method

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 2210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Urszula Kwast-Kotlarek ◽  
Maria Hełdak ◽  
Jakub Szczepański
Keyword(s):  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Breeding Site ◽  
Gas Pipeline ◽  
Common Frog ◽  
Directional Drilling ◽  
Horizontal Directional Drilling ◽  
Construction Stage ◽  
Alder Forest ◽  
Drilling Technology ◽  
June July

The study discusses the issue of introducing drilling fluid (bentonite) into the environment during the construction of linear underground investments, considering the example of the construction of the high-pressure gas pipeline, Czeszów—Kiełczów DN1000, which involved the use of the Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) method. The analyses concern the drilling stage as a low-waste technology, indicating the use and management of bentonite drilling fluid in a closed circulation cycle in the area of Pęciszów, poviat Trzebnica (Poland). The loss of drilling fluid in valuable natural areas during the construction stage of the gas pipeline has been analyzed. Drilling fluid is an element of the horizontal directional drilling technology (HDD). The analyzed area included a section of the route of the strategic gas pipeline, realized in June–July 2017 in an area of lowland ash and alder forest 91E0-3, a probable breeding site of the Bluethroat for a detailed description and common frog. The loss of the drilling fluid used in the drilling phase has been determined, depending on the type of soil and the related fraction as well as the possibility of treating the drilling fluid used to construct the drilling.

EMERGENCY RESPONSE IN THE PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION BY HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING

2015 ◽  
pp. 91-96
Author(s):  
I. E. Kiryanov ◽  
Yu. D. Zemenkov ◽  
S. M. Dorofeev ◽  
V. S. Toropov
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Response ◽  
Directional Drilling ◽  
Horizontal Directional Drilling ◽  
Pipeline Construction ◽  
Trenchless Construction

On the basis of analyzing the characteristics of used materials and the parameters of trenchless transitions profiles was developed emergency response, including several schemes of release a pipe jammed in the hole during the pipeline pulling in the pipeline construction by horizontal directional drilling. Proposed schemes applicability analyzed for trenchless construction real conditions.

Evaluation of Hydraulic Fracturing Models and Their Limitations to Predict No-Drill Zones for Horizontal Directional Drilling

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Delara ◽  
Kendra MacKay
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Safety Factor ◽  
Standard Procedure ◽  
Accurate Determination ◽  
Strength Properties ◽  
Analytical Models ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Directional Drilling ◽  
Horizontal Directional Drilling ◽  
The Impact

Horizontal directional drilling (HDD) has become the preferred method for trenchless pipeline installations. Drilling pressures must be limited and a “no-drill zone” determined to avoid exceeding the strength of surrounding soil and rock. The currently accepted industry method of calculating hydraulic fracturing limiting pressure with application of an arbitrary safety factor contains several assumptions that are often not applicable to specific ground conditions. There is also no standard procedure for safety factor determination, resulting in detrimental impacts on drilling operations. This paper provides an analysis of the standard methods and proposes two alternative analytical models to more accurately determine the hydraulic fracture point and acceptable drilling pressure. These alternative methods provide greater understanding of the interaction between the drilling pressures and the surrounding ground strength properties. This allows for more accurate determination of horizontal directional drilling limitations. A comparison is presented to determine the differences in characteristics and assumptions for each model. The impact of specific soil properties and factors is investigated by means of a sensitivity analysis to determine the most critical soil information for each model.

scholarly journals Development of a rapid field testing method for metals in horizontal directional drilling residuals with XRF sensor

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hailin Zhang ◽  
João Antonangelo ◽  
Chad Penn
Keyword(s):  
Moisture Content ◽  
Standard Method ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Field Method ◽  
Filter Press ◽  
Directional Drilling ◽  
Horizontal Directional Drilling ◽  
Excess Water ◽  
Spiked Soil

AbstractPortable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) spectrometer allows fast in-situ elemental determination without wet digestion for soils or geological materials, but the use of XRF on wet materials is not well documented. Our objective was to develop a rapid field method using pXRF to measure metals in the residues from horizontal directional drilling (HDD) operations so that proper disposal decisions can be made in-situ. To establish the procedure, we spiked soil samples with 4 concentrations of Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Cd, and Pb up to 1000 mg kg−1, and then the metal concentrations were determined by wet chemical method after drying and acid digestion (standard method), and by pXRF, also at laboratory conditions, after drying and at two different moisture conditions. The measurements by pXRF and standard method after drying and after removal of excess water (AREW) were highly correlated with slopes ranging from 0.83 ± 0.01 to 1.08 ± 0.01 (P < 0.001) for all metals. The relationship was better AREW than the saturated paste without removal of excess water and the moisture content affected only the accuracy of As, Cd, and Pb. The procedure established was successfully used for HDD residues collected from 26 states of US with moisture content ranging from 14 to 83% AREW. The pXRF was proven to be a reliable tool for fast detection of common metals in dried soils and HDD residues, and samples containing < 30% moisture content without needing to correct for moisture. If the moisture is > 30%, excess water in samples need to be removed with a commercially available filter press to achieve high accuracy. The developed procedures reduce time of metal detection from days to about an hour which allows drilling operators to make quick decisions on soil or HDD disposal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document