A simple incompressible flux splitting for sharp free surface capturing

2011 ◽  
Vol 69 (10) ◽  
pp. 1661-1678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang-Yao Niu ◽  
Jack R. Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Free Surface ◽  
Flux Splitting ◽  
Free Surface Capturing

Simulations of Dam-Break Flows Using Free Surface Capturing Method

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.-Y. Chang ◽  
L.-C. Lee ◽  
H.-C. Lien ◽  
J.-S. Lai
Keyword(s):  
Free Surface ◽  
Stokes Equations ◽  
Variable Density ◽  
Dam Break ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Navier Stokes Equations ◽  
Flow Equations ◽  
Weakly Compressible ◽  
Dam Break Flow ◽  
Free Surface Capturing

AbstractA model adopting the surface capturing method is developed for the simulation of dam-break flows by solving the Navier-Stokes equations of weakly compressible and variable density flows in open channels. Due to the characteristics of weakly compressible flow equations, a compressibility parameter describing the compressibility of fluid is determined to obtain the time-accurate flow fields in both liquid and gas regions simultaneously. Accordingly, the location of free surface can be captured as a discontinuity of the density field for dam-break flow simulations. The numerical algorithm in the proposed method is based on the framework of the finite volume method for discretization in space. To deal with the discontinuity property of fluid density near the free surface, the TVD-MUSCL scheme is adopted to overcome numerical oscillations and dissipation. For discretization in time, the explicit 4-stage Runge-Kutta scheme is employed in the model. Finally, several typical dam-break flow problems in open channel are simulated to demonstrate the validation and applicability of the proposed model.

A Stern Slamming Analysis Using Three-Dimensional CFD Simulation

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunho Kim ◽  
Yung S. Shin ◽  
Suqin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Free Surface ◽  
Cfd Simulation ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Loading Conditions ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Pressure Coefficients ◽  
Free Surface Capturing ◽  
Design Pressure

A stern slamming analysis based on three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation is presented with an application to a liquefied natural gas (LNG) carrier with twin skegs. This study includes; seakeeping analysis, statistical analysis for relative motions and velocities, three-dimensional slamming simulation by a CFD software, and structural assessment for plates and stiffeners. The stern areas are divided into panels in which relative velocity/motion and pressure coefficients are to be calculated. Seakeeping calculations are carried out in full load and ballast loading conditions at ship speeds of 0 and 5 knots. A series of equivalent 20-year return sea states in a wave scatter diagram are selected for environmental conditions. Extreme velocities are then evaluated from the loading conditions and the speeds considered with reference to the probability of slamming occurrence. Slamming simulations are carried out in a three-dimensional domain with a CFD software to calculate pressure coefficients. Two-phase flow with water and air is to be adopted in conjunction with free surface capturing method. Viscous laminar flow is assumed in simulation. Slamming design pressure is calculated by the pressure coefficients and the extreme velocities. Based on computed design pressure, an ultimate strength analysis is performed for the determination of required plate thickness. Also, required stiffener dimensions are determined by analytic formulas. As mentioned above, this approach has been applied to an LNG carrier with twin skegs. In the application, two-phase flow with water and air was adopted in conjunction with the volume-of-fluid method for free surface capturing. Mixed hexahedral and tetrahedral grids were employed. The computational case was determined from simulations of global ship motion. Maximum slamming pressure was found near the end of a skeg. Large pressure also can be observed in the stern overhang area. Generally slamming pressure decreases away from the stern.

A Three-Dimensional Version of the Free Surface Capturing Discretization for Staggered Grid Finite Difference Schemes: Implementation into StagYY

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Tackley
Keyword(s):  
Free Surface ◽  
Finite Difference ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Small Time ◽  
Staggered Grid ◽  
Finite Difference Schemes ◽  
Finite Volume Scheme ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Simulation Code ◽  
Free Surface Capturing

<p>In order to treat a free surface in models of lithosphere and mantle dynamics that use a fixed Eulerian grid it is typical to use "sticky air", a layer of low-viscosity, low-density material above the solid surface (e.g. Crameri et al., 2012). This can, however, cause numerical problems, including poor solver convergence due to the huge viscosity jump and small time-steps due to high velocities in the air. Additionally, it is not completely realistic because the assumed viscosity of the air layer is typically similar to that of rock in the asthenosphere so the surface is not stress free.  </p><p>In order to overcome these problems, Duretz et al. (2016) introduced and tested a method for treating the free surface that instead detects and applies special conditions at the free surface. This avoids the huge viscosity jump and having to solve for velocities in the air. They applied it to a two-dimensional staggered grid finite difference / finite volume scheme, a discretization that is in common use for modelling mantle and lithosphere dynamics. Here I document the application of this approach to a three-dimensional spherical staggered grid solver in the mantle simulation code StagYY. Some adjustments had to be made to the two-dimensional scheme documented in Duretz et al. (2016) in order to avoid problems due to undefined velocities for certain boundary topographies. The approach was applied not only to the Stokes solver but also to the temperature solver, including the implementation of a mixed radiative/conductive boundary condition applicable to surface magma oceans/lakes.</p><p><strong>References</strong></p><p>Crameri, F., H. Schmeling, G. J. Golabek, T. Duretz, R. Orendt, S. J. H. Buiter, D. A. May, B. J. P. Kaus, T. V. Gerya, and P. J. Tackley (2012), A comparison of numerical surface topography calculations in geodynamic modelling: an evaluation of the ‘sticky air’ method, Geophysical Journal International,189(1), 38-54, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05388.x.</p><p>Duretz, T., D. A. May, and P. Yamato (2016), A free surface capturing discretization for the staggered grid finite difference scheme, Geophysical Journal International, 204(3), 1518-1530, doi:10.1093/gji/ggv526.</p>

scholarly journals Numerical modelling of pipeline scour under the combined action of waves and current with free-surface capturing

2019 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 19-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadeem Ahmad ◽  
Hans Bihs ◽  
Dag Myrhaug ◽  
Arun Kamath ◽  
Øivind A. Arntsen
Keyword(s):  
Free Surface ◽  
Numerical Modelling ◽  
Combined Action ◽  
Free Surface Capturing
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document