scholarly journals Evaluation of Terrestrial Laser Scanner and Structure from Motion photogrammetry techniques for quantifying soil surface roughness parameters over agricultural soils

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 605-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Martinez‐Agirre ◽  
Jesús Álvarez‐Mozos ◽  
Milutin Milenković ◽  
Norbert Pfeifer ◽  
Rafael Giménez ◽  
...  
Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (13) ◽  
pp. 4386
Author(s):  
Afshin Azizi ◽  
Yousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh ◽  
Tarahom Mesri-Gundoshmian ◽  
Aitazaz A. Farooque ◽  
Hassan Afzaal

Soil roughness is one of the most challenging issues in the agricultural domain and plays a crucial role in soil quality. The objective of this research was to develop a computerized method based on stereo vision technique to estimate the roughness formed on the agricultural soils. Additionally, soil till quality was investigated by analyzing the height of plow layers. An image dataset was provided in the real conditions of the field. For determining the soil surface roughness, the elevation of clods obtained from tillage operations was computed using a depth map. This map was obtained by extracting and matching corresponding keypoints as super pixels of images. Regression equations and coefficients of determination between the measured and estimated values indicate that the proposed method has a strong potential for the estimation of soil shallow roughness as an important physical parameter in tillage operations. In addition, peak fitting of tilled layers was applied to the height profile to evaluate the till quality. The results of this suggest that the peak fitting is an effective method of judging tillage quality in the fields.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2210
Author(s):  
Zohreh Alijani ◽  
John Lindsay ◽  
Melanie Chabot ◽  
Tracy Rowlandson ◽  
Aaron Berg

Surface roughness is an important factor in many soil moisture retrieval models. Therefore, any mischaracterization of surface roughness parameters (root mean square height, RMSH, and correlation length, ʅ) may result in unreliable predictions and soil moisture estimations. In many environments, but particularly in agricultural settings, surface roughness parameters may show different behaviours with respect to the orientation or azimuth. Consequently, the relationship between SAR polarimetric variables and surface roughness parameters may vary depending on measurement orientation. Generally, roughness obtained for many SAR-based studies is estimated using pin profilers that may, or may not, be collected with careful attention to orientation to the satellite look angle. In this study, we characterized surface roughness parameters in multi-azimuth mode using a terrestrial laser scanner (TLS). We characterized the surface roughness parameters in different orientations and then examined the sensitivity between polarimetric variables and surface roughness parameters; further, we compared these results to roughness profiles obtained using traditional pin profilers. The results showed that the polarimetric variables were more sensitive to the surface roughness parameters at higher incidence angles (θ). Moreover, when surface roughness measurements were conducted at the look angle of RADARSAT-2, more significant correlations were observed between polarimetric variables and surface roughness parameters. Our results also indicated that TLS can represent more reliable results than pin profiler in the measurement of the surface roughness parameters.


2011 ◽  
Vol 383-390 ◽  
pp. 5357-5362
Author(s):  
Zi Cheng Zheng ◽  
Shu Qin He

Based on the determination method of the comprehensive domestic and international surface roughness, by the method of indoor artificial rainfall, the determination of soil surface roughness had been studied from the measurement accuracy, time-consuming and resolution. The results showed that the laser scanner method was the best to determine the surface roughness, followed by pin meter method, the roller chain meter method, and the ruler was the worst. The results of determination had the better correlation between the laser scanner method and the roller chain meter method before rainfall, however they had poor correlation after rainfall. They had the better correlation between the laser scanner method and pin meter method both before rainfall and after rainfall. And on this basis, the relationships were established among the different methods. The results provide theory basis for the further study on soil surface roughness. At the same time, it would serve for harnessing soil and water loss of the slope farmland in Loess Plateau.


2014 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 107-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Turner ◽  
Rocco Panciera ◽  
Mihai A. Tanase ◽  
Kim Lowell ◽  
Jorg M. Hacker ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin K. B. Abban ◽  
A. N. (Thanos) Papanicolaou ◽  
Christos P. Giannopoulos ◽  
Dimitrios C. Dermisis ◽  
Kenneth M. Wacha ◽  
...  

Abstract. This study examines the rainfall-induced change in soil microroughness of a bare smooth soil surface in an agricultural field. The majority of soil microroughness studies have focused on surface roughness on the order of ∼ 5–50 mm and have reported a decay of soil surface roughness with rainfall. However, there is quantitative evidence from a few studies suggesting that surfaces with microroughness less than 5 mm may undergo an increase in roughness when subject to rainfall action. The focus herein is on initial microroughness length scales on the order of 2 mm, a low roughness condition observed seasonally in some landscapes under bare conditions and chosen to systematically examine the increasing roughness phenomenon. Three rainfall intensities of 30, 60, and 75 mm h−1 are applied to a smoothened bed surface in a field plot via a rainfall simulator. Soil surface microroughness is recorded via a surface-profile laser scanner. Several indices are utilized to quantify the soil surface microroughness, namely the random roughness (RR) index, the crossover length, the variance scale from the Markov–Gaussian model, and the limiting difference. Findings show a consistent increase in roughness under the action of rainfall, with an overall agreement between all indices in terms of trend and magnitude. Although this study is limited to a narrow range of rainfall and soil conditions, the results suggest that the outcome of the interaction between rainfall and a soil surface can be different for smooth and rough surfaces and thus warrant the need for a better understanding of this interaction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document