Implications of model uncertainty for the mapping of hillslope-scale soil erosion predictions

2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 1333-1352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Brazier ◽  
Keith J. Beven ◽  
Steven G. Anthony ◽  
John S. Rowan
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joris Eekhout ◽  
Agustín Millares-Valenzuela ◽  
Alberto Martínez-Salvador ◽  
Rafael García-Lorenzo ◽  
Pedro Pérez-Cutillas ◽  
...  

<p>The impact of climate change on future soil loss is commonly assessed with soil erosion models, which are potentially an important source of uncertainty. Here we propose a soil erosion model ensemble, with the aim to reduce the model uncertainty in climate change impact assessments. The model ensemble consisted of five continuous process-based soil erosion models that run at a daily time step, i.e. DHSVM, HSPF, INCA, MMF and SHETRAN. All models simulate detachment by raindrop impact (interrill erosion), detachment by runoff (rill erosion) and immediate deposition of sediment within the cell of its origin. The models were implemented in the SPHY hydrological model. The soil erosion model ensemble was applied in a semi-arid catchment in the southeast of Spain. We applied three future climate scenarios based on global mean temperature rise (+1.5, +2 and +3 ºC). Data from two contrasting regional climate models were used to assess how an increase and a decrease in extreme precipitation affect model uncertainty. Soil loss is projected to increase and decrease under climate change, mostly reflecting the change in extreme precipitation. Model uncertainty is found to increase with increasing slope, extreme precipitation and runoff, which reveals some inherent differences in model assumptions among the five models. Moreover, the model uncertainty increases in all climate change scenarios, independent on the projected change in annual precipitation and extreme precipitation. This supports the importance to consider model uncertainty through model ensembles of climate, hydrology, and soil erosion in climate change impact assessments.</p><p>This research was funded by ERDF/Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities - State Research Agency (AEI) /Project CGL2017-84625-C2-1-R; State Program for Research, Development and Innovation Focused on the Challenges of Society.</p>


Author(s):  
J.P.C. Eekhout ◽  
A. Millares‐Valenzuela ◽  
A. Martínez‐Salvador ◽  
R. García‐Lorenzo ◽  
P. Pérez‐Cutillas ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 340-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Brazier

The role of erosion by water in the UK is considered. A summary of available data describing water erosion is presented providing insights into rates of erosion from the hillslope scale to the large catchment scale. Evidence suggests that soil erosion rates in excess of acceptable thresholds occur on a wide range of soils and under a wide range of land uses throughout the country. Given the recent shift towards erosion modelling and away from erosion monitoring, discussion of the quality of existing available observed data in the context of model evaluation is made. Much quality data exist in the UK to describe erosion by water, but it is argued here that few datasets provide the necessary detail with which to evaluate model performance accurately, especially when the description of the spatial heterogeneity of soil loss is a goal. Furthermore, the paradox between data collection (to improve models) and erosion modelling (to replace data collection) is highlighted as an issue that must be addressed within the discipline if full use of datasets and improvement of models is to be made.


2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.H. Durán Zuazo ◽  
J.R. Francia Martínez ◽  
A. Martínez Raya

Soil Research ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 285 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. Sheridan ◽  
H. B. So ◽  
R. J. Loch ◽  
C. Pocknee ◽  
C. M. Walker

Prediction of hillslope-scale soil erosion traditionally involves extensive data collection from field plots under natural rainfall, or from field rainfall simulation programs. Recognising the high costs and inconvenience associated with field-based studies, a method was developed and tested for predicting hillslope-scale soil erosion from laboratory-scale measurements of erodibility. A laboratory tilting flume and rainfall simulator were used to determine rill and interill erodibility coefficients for 32 soils and overburdens from Queensland open-cut coal mines. Predicted sediment delivery rates based on laboratory determinations of erodibility were tested against field measurements of erosion from 12-m-long plots under simulated rainfall at 100 mm/h on slopes ranging from 5% to 30%. Regression analysis demonstrated a strong relationship between predicted and measured sediment delivery rates, giving an r2 value of up to 0.74, depending on the particular modeling approach used. These results demonstrate that soil losses due to the combined processes of rill and interill erosion at the hillslope scale can successfully be predicted from laboratory-scale measurements of erodibility, provided a suitable methodology and modelling approach is adopted. The success of this approach will greatly reduce the cost and effort required for prediction of hillslope scale soil erosion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document