A novel calcium looping–integrated NGCC power plant configuration for carbon capture and utilization—Comprehensive performance analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Basant Kumar Pillai ◽  
Gajanan Dattarao Surywanshi ◽  
Venkata Suresh Patnaikuni ◽  
Sarath Babu Anne ◽  
Ramsagar Vooradi
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Performance Analysis ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture And Utilization ◽  
Calcium Looping ◽  
Comprehensive Performance ◽  
Plant Configuration

Process design and performance analysis of a Staged, Pressurized Oxy-Combustion (SPOC) power plant for carbon capture

2014 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 179-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshay Gopan ◽  
Benjamin M. Kumfer ◽  
Jeffrey Phillips ◽  
David Thimsen ◽  
Richard Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Performance Analysis ◽  
Process Design ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
And Performance

scholarly journals Economic Evaluation of Carbon Capture and Utilization Applying the Technology of Mineral Carbonation at Coal-Fired Power Plant

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (15) ◽  
pp. 6175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bong Jae Lee ◽  
Jeong Il Lee ◽  
Soo Young Yun ◽  
Cheol-Soo Lim ◽  
Young-Kwon Park
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Operating Cost ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Mineral Carbonation ◽  
Economy Of Scale ◽  
Carbon Capture And Utilization ◽  
Cost Of Energy ◽  
Energy Penalty ◽  
And Storage

Based on the operating data of a 40 tCO2/day (2 megawatt (MW)) class carbon capture and utilization (CCU) pilot plant, the scaled-up 400 tCO2/day (20 MW) class CCU plant at 500 MW power plant was economically analyzed by applying the levelized cost of energy analysis (LCOE) and CO2 avoided cost. This study shows that the LCOE and CO2 avoided cost for 400 tCO2/day class CCU plant of mineral carbonation technology were 26 USD/MWh and 64 USD/tCO2, representing low LCOE and CO2 avoided cost, compared to other carbon capture and storage CCS and CCU plants. Based on the results of this study, the LCOE and CO2 avoided cost may become lower by the economy of scale, even if the CO2 treatment capacity of the CCU plant could be extended as much as for similar businesses. Therefore, the CCU technology by mineral carbonation has an economic advantage in energy penalty, power plant construction, and operating cost over other CCS and CCU with other technology.

Calcium looping with inherent energy storage for decarbonisation of coal-fired power plant

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 971-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawid P. Hanak ◽  
Chechet Biliyok ◽  
Vasilije Manovic
Keyword(s):  
Energy Storage ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Power Systems ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Fossil Fuel ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Calcium Looping ◽  
And Storage

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) with energy storage (ES) systems increase flexibility and profitability of fossil-fuel-fired power systems.

Performance analysis of a double calcium looping‐integrated biomass‐fired power plant: Exploring a carbon reduction opportunity

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 5301-5318 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Basant Kumar Pillai ◽  
Gajanan Dattarao Surywanshi ◽  
Venkata Suresh Patnaikuni ◽  
Sarath Babu Anne ◽  
Ramsagar Vooradi
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Performance Analysis ◽  
Carbon Reduction ◽  
Calcium Looping

scholarly journals A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO2 and SO2 from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Coppola ◽  
Fabrizio Scala
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Fossil Fuels ◽  
Maintenance Cost ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Calcium Looping

The increase of capital investments and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs represents a current limitation to the diffusion of carbon capture systems for the clean combustion of fossil fuels. However, post-combustion systems, such as calcium looping (CaL), for CO2 capture from flue gas are the most attractive carbon capture systems since they can be installed at new plants and retrofitted into existing power plants. This work investigates the pros and cons of employing a calcium looping system for CO2 capture and also as a desulphurization unit. A preliminary techno-economic analysis was carried out comparing a base case consisting of a coal-based power plant of about 550MWe with a desulphurization unit (Case 1), the same plant but with a CaL system added for CO2 capture (Case 2), or the same plant but with a CaL system for simultaneous capture of CO2 and SO2 and the removal of the desulphurization unit (Case 3). Case 2 resulted in a 67% increase of capital investment with respect to the benchmark case, while the increase was lower (48%) in Case 3. In terms of O&M costs, the most important item was represented by the yearly maintenance cost of the desulphurization unit. In fact, in Case 3, a reduction of O&M costs of about 8% was observed with respect to Case 2.

Analysis of gas turbine combined heat and power system for carbon capture installation of coal-fired power plant

Energy ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Chmielniak ◽  
Sebastian Lepszy ◽  
Katarzyna Wójcik
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Power System ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Combined Heat And Power

Current and Future Perspectives on Catalytic-based Integrated Carbon Capture and Utilization

2021 ◽  
pp. 148081
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ashraf Sabri ◽  
Samar Al Jitan ◽  
Daniel Bahamon ◽  
Lourdes F. Vega ◽  
Giovanni Palmisano
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Future Perspectives ◽  
Carbon Capture And Utilization
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document