scholarly journals A noniterative design procedure for supplemental brace-damper systems in single-degree-of-freedom systems

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (15) ◽  
pp. 2361-2367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julián M. Londoño ◽  
Simon A. Neild ◽  
David J. Wagg
Keyword(s):  
Design Procedure ◽  
Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Single Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Single Degree

Simplified seismic code design procedure for friction-damped steel frames

1999 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaomin Fu ◽  
Sheldon Cherry
Keyword(s):  
Design Procedure ◽  
Steel Structures ◽  
Lateral Force ◽  
Building Codes ◽  
Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Friction Damper ◽  
Single Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Single Degree ◽  
Damped System ◽  
Seismic Force

This paper describes the development of a proposed seismic design procedure for friction-damped steel structures, which employs the lateral force provisions used in many modern building codes. Closed-form expressions are first derived that relate the normalized response of a single degree of freedom friction-damped system with the system parameters, such as bracing stiffness ratio, damper slip ratio, and frame member ductility. A parametric analysis is then used to reveal that the seismic displacement of a friction-damped frame can be controlled by combining the frame stiffness with the bracing stiffness of the friction damper component, while the seismic force can be controlled by the damper slip force. A force modification factor (equivalent to the code R-factor) and displacement estimate for a friction-damped system are next determined. The single degree of freedom results are subsequently used to develop expressions for dealing with the multi degree of freedom situation, which permits the seismic lateral force design procedure adopted by many current building codes to be applied to friction-damped systems. The proposed procedure allows the frame response to be controlled so that the displacement can be limited to small magnitudes and the overall structural shape to an essentially straight-line deformation. Design examples illustrate that friction-damped frame systems are economical and offer a better overall response performance than that provided by conventional systems under the design earthquake.Key words: passive energy dissipation system, friction damper, steel frame, design procedure, static analysis.

Kinematic comparison of single degree-of-freedom robotic gait trainers

2021 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 104258
Author(s):  
Jeonghwan Lee ◽  
Lailu Li ◽  
Sung Yul Shin ◽  
Ashish D. Deshpande ◽  
James Sulzer
Keyword(s):  
Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Single Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Single Degree ◽  
Robotic Gait

Single-Degree-of-Freedom Based Pressure-Impulse Diagrams for Blast Damage Assessment

2014 ◽  
Vol 567 ◽  
pp. 499-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zubair Imam Syed ◽  
Mohd Shahir Liew ◽  
Muhammad Hasibul Hasan ◽  
Srikanth Venkatesan
Keyword(s):  
Damage Assessment ◽  
Structural Response ◽  
Blast Loading ◽  
Computational Effort ◽  
Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Negative Phase ◽  
Single Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Pressure Impulse ◽  
Single Degree ◽  
Structural Resistance

Pressure-impulse (P-I) diagrams, which relates damage with both impulse and pressure, are widely used in the design and damage assessment of structural elements under blast loading. Among many methods of deriving P-I diagrams, single degree of freedom (SDOF) models are widely used to develop P-I diagrams for damage assessment of structural members exposed to blast loading. The popularity of the SDOF method in structural response calculation in its simplicity and cost-effective approach that requires limited input data and less computational effort. The SDOF model gives reasonably good results if the response mode shape is representative of the real behaviour. Pressure-impulse diagrams based on SDOF models are derived based on idealised structural resistance functions and the effect of few of the parameters related to structural response and blast loading are ignored. Effects of idealisation of resistance function, inclusion of damping and load rise time on P-I diagrams constructed from SDOF models have been investigated in this study. In idealisation of load, the negative phase of the blast pressure pulse is ignored in SDOF analysis. The effect of this simplification has also been explored. Matrix Laboratory (MATLAB) codes were developed for response calculation of the SDOF system and for repeated analyses of the SDOF models to construct the P-I diagrams. Resistance functions were found to have significant effect on the P-I diagrams were observed. Inclusion of negative phase was found to have notable impact of the shape of P-I diagrams in the dynamic zone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document