A simple ground-motion prediction model for cumulative absolute velocity and model validation

2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 1189-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenqi Du ◽  
Gang Wang
2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 931-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth W. Campbell ◽  
Yousef Bozorgnia

Arias intensity (AI) and cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) have been proposed as instrumental intensity measures that can incorporate the cumulative effects of ground motion duration and intensity on the response of structural and geotechnical systems. In this study, we have developed a ground motion prediction equation (GMPE) for the horizontal component of AI in order to compare its predictability to a similar GMPE for CAV. Both GMPEs were developed using the same strong motion database and functional form in order to eliminate any bias these factors might cause in the comparison. This comparison shows that AI exhibits significantly greater amplitude scaling and aleatory uncertainty than CAV. The smaller standard deviation and less sensitivity to amplitude suggests that CAV is more predictable than AI and should be considered as an alternative to AI in engineering and geotechnical applications where the latter intensity measure is traditionally used.


2020 ◽  
pp. 875529302095734
Author(s):  
Zach Bullock ◽  
Abbie B Liel ◽  
Shideh Dashti ◽  
Keith A. Porter

Recent research has highlighted the usefulness of cumulative absolute velocity [Formula: see text] in several contexts, including using the [Formula: see text] at the ground surface for earthquake early warning and using the [Formula: see text] at rock reference conditions for evaluation of the liquefaction risk facing structures. However, there are relatively few ground motion prediction equations for CAV, they are based on relatively small data sets, and they give relatively similar results. This study develops nine ground motion prediction equations for [Formula: see text] based on a global database of ground motion records from shallow crustal earthquakes. Its provision of nine models enables characterization of epistemic uncertainty for ranges of earthquake characteristics that are sparsely populated in the regression database. The functional forms provide different perspectives on extrapolation to important ranges of earthquake characteristics, particularly large magnitude events and short distances. The variability and epistemic uncertainty in the models are characterized. Spatial autocorrelation of the models’ errors is investigated. The models’ predictions agree with existing broadly applicable models at small to moderate magnitudes and moderate to long distances. These models can be used to improve hazard analysis of [Formula: see text] that incorporates the influence of epistemic uncertainty.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 1177-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Heresi ◽  
Héctor Dávalos ◽  
Eduardo Miranda

This paper presents a ground motion prediction model (GMPM) for estimating medians and standard deviations of the random horizontal component of the peak inelastic displacement of 5% damped single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems, with bilinear hysteretic behavior and 3% postelastic stiffness ratio, directly as a function of the earthquake magnitude and the distance to the source. The equations were developed using a mixed effects model, with 1,662 recorded ground motions from 63 seismic events. In the proposed model, the median is computed as a function of the vibration period and the normalized strength of the system, as well as the event magnitude and the Joyner-Boore distance to the source. The standard deviation of the model is computed as a function of the vibration period and the normalized strength of the system. The proposed model has the advantage of not requiring an auxiliary elastic GMPM to predict the median and dispersion of peak inelastic displacement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document