scholarly journals Efficacy of dapagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction according to body mass index

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carly Adamson ◽  
Pardeep S Jhund ◽  
Kieran F Docherty ◽  
Jan Bělohlávek ◽  
Chern‐En Chiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

Association of Body Mass Index With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Treated With Sacubitril/Valsartan

2021 ◽  
pp. 107424842110244
Author(s):  
Kazuhiko Kido ◽  
Christopher Bianco ◽  
Marco Caccamo ◽  
Wei Fang ◽  
George Sokos
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Propensity Score Weighting ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Background: Only limited data are available that address the association between body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who are receiving sacubitril/valsartan. Methods: We performed a retrospective multi-center cohort study in which we compared 3 body mass index groups (normal, overweight and obese groups) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction receiving sacubitril/valsartan. The follow-up period was at least 1 year. Propensity score weighting was performed. The primary outcomes were hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause mortality. Results: Of the 721 patients in the original cohort, propensity score weighting generated a cohort of 540 patients in 3 groups: normal weight (n = 78), overweight (n = 181), and obese (n = 281). All baseline characteristics were well-balanced between 3 groups after propensity score weighting. Among our results, we found no significant differences in hospitalization for heart failure (normal weight versus overweight: average hazard ratio [AHR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76-2.20, P = 0.35; normal weight versus obese: AHR 1.04, 95% CI = 0.63-1.70, P = 0.88; overweight versus obese groups: AHR 0.81, 95% CI = 0.54-1.20, P = 0.29) or all-cause mortality (normal weight versus overweight: AHR 0.99, 95% CI = 0.59-1.67, P = 0.97; normal weight versus obese: AHR 0.87, 95% CI = 0.53-1.42, P = 0.57; overweight versus obese: AHR 0.87, 95% CI = 0.58-1.32, P = 0.52). Conclusion: We identified no significant associations between BMI and clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction who were treated with sacubitril/valsartan. A large-scale study should be performed to verify these results.

scholarly journals High body mass index is a predictor of left ventricular reverse remodelling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 686-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Cescau ◽  
Lucas N.L. Van Aelst ◽  
Mathilde Baudet ◽  
Alain Cohen Solal ◽  
Damien Logeart
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
High Body Mass Index ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
High Body ◽  
Reverse Remodelling

scholarly journals Regional muscle-adipose distribution is different in patients with heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Ishikawa ◽  
Y Izumiya ◽  
A Shibata ◽  
T Yoshida ◽  
H Hayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Adipose Tissue ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Exercise Capacity ◽  
Exercise Tolerance ◽  
The Other ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Regional Muscle

Abstract Background Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) has been recognized to contribute inflammatory activity and atherosclerosis. On the other hand, it has been reported that the volume of EAT is lower in non-ischemic heart failure (HF) patients than healthy individuals. However, the difference in regional muscle-adipose distribution including EAT between HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has not been investigated. In addition, we investigated whether distribution of body composition contributed to exercise capacity. Methods The study included 105 non-ischemic HF patients diagnosed by cardiac catheterization between September 2017 and November 2019. Epicardial, abdominal and thigh muscle and adipose tissue volume were measured by computed tomography (CT), and exercise tolerance was evaluated by symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test. Results Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the left ventricular ejection fraction, ≥40% as HFpEF (n=28) or <40% as HFrEF (n=77). There was no significant difference comorbidity, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, and body mass index. Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide level was significantly higher in HFrEF than HFpEF group (146.2 vs 393.2 pg/ml, p<0.01), whereas, high-sensitive troponin T level was not different between two groups. Although there was no significant difference in BMI between two groups, the volume of EAT was significantly higher in HFpEF than HFrEF group (81.8 vs 136.4 ml, p=0.01). On the other hand, HFpEF had more thigh adipose tissue compared with HFrEF group (54.6 vs 42.1 ml, p=0.03). There were negative correlations between EAT volume and parameters of exercise capacity such as anaerobic threshold (r=−0.42, p<0.01) and peak VO2 (r=−0.32, p<0.01). Muscle volume itself does not corelate with these parameters. Conclusion In patient with nonischemic HF, the pattern of regional adipose distribution may have important role in pathologically. HFpEF and HFrEF has different pattern despite similar body mass index. These differences may be related to impaired exercise tolerance in these 2 different types of HF. Correlation between EAT and AT, peak VO2 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

P2607Quick nutritional assessment and prognosis in outpatients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Zamora ◽  
B Gonzalez ◽  
C Rivas ◽  
V Diaz ◽  
P Velayos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Functional Class ◽  
Nyha Functional Class

Abstract Background Nutritional status is an important prognostic factor in patients with heart failure (HF) beyond body mass index, although its prognostic value in patients with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is not completely elucidated. In a pilot study we observed that the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) was the best approach for the screening of nutritional status in HF outpatients over others screening tools. Purpose To assess the prognostic role of malnutrition or risk of malnutrition in HFmrEF outpatients after the implementation of the MNA-SF screening tool in a routine way in a multidisciplinary HF. Methods The MNA-SF screening tool was administered during the global nurse evaluation of patients. The scoring ranges from 0 to 14, being 0 to7 as malnutrition status, 8 to 11 as at risk of malnutrition and 12 to 14 as normal nutritional status. For the present study those patients with malnutrition and at risk of malnutrition were merged and considered abnormal nutritional status. All-cause death was the primary end-point. Univariate and multivariate (backward conditional stepwise) Cox regression analyses were performed. Results Since October 2016 to November 2017, 153 HFmrEF patients were studied (mean age 68.8±11.7 years, 72.5% men, body mass index 28.4±4.4, LVEF 44% ± 3, NYHA class I 5.9%, II 86.3%, and III 7.8%). According to the MNA-SF 25 patients were (16.3%) fulfilled criteria of malnutrition (4) or where at risk of malnutrition (21). During a mean follow-up of 17.4±6.1 months, 23 patients died (15%). In the univariate analysis, nutritional abnormal status was significantly associated with all-cause death (HR 2.93 [1.23–7], p=0.02). In the multivariate analysis which included age, sex, NYHA functional class, body mass index, ischemic aetiology of HF and years of duration of HF, abnormal nutritional status remained significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR 3.64 [1.39–9.54], p=0.009), together with NYHA functional class (HR 7.93 [2.69–23.4], p<0.001) and years of HF duration (HR 1.10 [1.04–1.16], p=0.001). Conclusions Nutritional status assessed with the screening MNA-SF was an independent predictor of all-cause death in ambulatory patients with HFmrEF – beyond BMI – together with NYHA functional class and HF duration.

Body mass index and outcomes in ischaemic versus non-ischaemic heart failure across the spectrum of ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
pp. 204748732092761
Author(s):  
Francesco Gentile ◽  
Paolo Sciarrone ◽  
Elisabet Zamora ◽  
Marta De Antonio ◽  
Evelyn Santiago ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Mild Obesity

Aims Obesity is related to better prognosis in heart failure with either reduced (HFrEF; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%) or preserved LVEF (HFpEF; LVEF ≥50%). Whether the obesity paradox exists in patients with heart failure and mid-range LVEF (HFmrEF; LVEF 40–49%) and whether it is independent of heart failure aetiology is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to test the prognostic value of body mass index (BMI) in ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart failure patients across the whole spectrum of LVEF. Methods Consecutive ambulatory heart failure patients were enrolled in two tertiary centres in Italy and Spain and classified as HFrEF, HFmrEF or HFpEF, of either ischaemic or non-ischaemic aetiology. Patients were stratified into underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2), normal-weight (BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2), mild-obese (BMI 30–34.9 kg/m2), moderate-obese (BMI 35–39.9 kg/m2) and severe-obese (BMI ≥40 kg/m2) and followed up for the end-point of five-year all-cause mortality. Results We enrolled 5155 patients (age 70 years (60–77); 71% males; LVEF 35% (27–45); 63% HFrEF, 18% HFmrEF, 19% HFpEF). At multivariable analysis, mild obesity was independently associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in HFrEF (hazard ratio, 0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64–0.95), p = 0.020), HFmrEF (hazard ratio 0.63 (95% CI 0.41–0.96), p = 0.029), and HFpEF (hazard ratio 0.60 (95% CI 0.42–0.88), p = 0.008). Both overweight and mild-to-moderate obesity were associated with better outcome in non-ischaemic heart failure, but not in ischaemic heart failure. Conclusions Mild obesity is independently associated with better survival in heart failure across the whole spectrum of LVEF. Prognostic benefit of obesity is maintained only in non-ischaemic heart failure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document