Diuretic response and effects of diuretic omission in ambulatory heart failure patients on chronic low‐dose loop diuretic therapy

Author(s):  
Jeroen Dauw ◽  
Pieter Martens ◽  
Gregorio Tersalvi ◽  
Joren Schouteden ◽  
Sébastien Deferm ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. S34-S35
Author(s):  
J. Samuel Broughton ◽  
Jennifer S. Hanberg ◽  
Mahlet Assefa ◽  
Veena S. Rao ◽  
Jeffrey M. Testani

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masataka Kamiya ◽  
Naoki Sato ◽  
Ayaka Nozaki ◽  
Mai Akiya ◽  
Hirotake Okazaki ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 102 (10) ◽  
pp. 745-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Pedro Ferreira ◽  
Mário Santos ◽  
Sofia Almeida ◽  
Irene Marques ◽  
Paulo Bettencourt ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Behnood Bikdeli ◽  
Kelly Strait ◽  
Kumar Dharmarajan ◽  
Chohreh Partovian ◽  
Nancy Kim ◽  
...  

Background: Although loop diuretics are frequently used for patients with heart failure (HF), little is known about the variation in patterns of diuretic therapy in US hospitals. We sought to describe such treatment patterns among a diverse group of hospitals. Methods: We studied HF hospitalizations occurring during 2009-10 in Premier Inc. hospitals participating in a collaborative project to pool administrative and charge data, which includes information about drug types, average daily dose, and duration of therapy. We excluded hospitals with less than 25 HF hospitalizations. For ease of comparison, all diuretic doses were converted to bioequivalent doses of intravenous (IV) furosemide: 40mg IV furosemide ∼ 80mg oral furosemide ∼ 20mg (oral or IV) torsemide ∼ 1mg (oral or IV) bumetanide. Summary statistics were calculated. Results: Among 366 studied hospitals (264,675 HF hospitalizations), use of any loop diuretic had an interquartile range (IQR) from 92% to 96% (median: 94%). At the hospital level, the average daily dose IQR varied from 45mg to 64 mg (median: 55 mg) and the median duration of therapy was 4 days (IQR: 4 to 4; median: 4), as was the median length of stay. The IQR for use of furosemide varied from 89% to 94% (median: 92%), and its median average daily dose had an IQR from 40mg to 60 mg (median: 53 mg). Hospital use of bumetanide had an IQR from 2% to 11%, and hospital use of torsemide had an IQR from 0% to 4% (medians of 5% and 1%, respectively). The variation in median average daily dose for bumetanide and torsemide was greater than for furosemide (bumetanide IQR: 79mg to 127 mg, with median of 89 mg; torsemide IQR: 53mg to 120 mg, with median of 80 mg). Use of IV diuretics on the last day before home discharge had an IQR from 16% to 33% (median: 24%) across hospitals. Conclusion: US hospitals administer loop diuretics, particularly furosemide, to the vast majority of HF inpatients. The duration and daily dosage of therapy was similar across most hospitals. In contrast, a minority of hospitals used bumetanide and torsemide for several patients. The daily dosage of these agents showed more marked variation. We observed a high rate of intravenous diuretic use on the last day of hospitalization, with considerable variation across hospitals.


2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shrenik Doshi ◽  
T Velpandian ◽  
Sandeep Seth ◽  
SK Maulik ◽  
Balram Bhargava ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 2932
Author(s):  
Mauro Feola ◽  
Arianna Rossi ◽  
Marzia Testa ◽  
Cinzia Ferreri ◽  
Alberto Palazzuoli ◽  
...  

Background. The diuretic response has been shown to be a robust independent marker of cardiovascular outcomes in acute heart failure patients. The objectives of this clinical research are to analyze two different formulas (diuretic response (DR) or response to diuretic (R-to-D)) in predicting 6-month clinical outcomes. Methods: Consecutive patients discharged alive after an acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) were enrolled. All patients underwent N-terminal-pro hormone BNP (NT-proBNP) and an echocardiogram together with DR and R-to-D calculation during diuretic administration. Death by any cause, cardiac transplantation and worsening heart failure (HF) requiring readmission to hospital were considered cardiovascular events. Results: 263 patients (62% male, age 78 years) were analyzed at 6-month follow-up. During the follow-up 58 (22.05%) events were scheduled. Patients who experienced CV-event had a worse renal function (p = 0.001), a higher NT-proBNP (p = 0.001), a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.01), DR (p = 0.02) and R-to-D (p = 0.03). Spearman rho’s correlation coefficient showed a strong direct correlation between DR and R to D in all patients (r = 0.93; p < 0.001) and both in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (r = 0.94; p < 0.001) and HF preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (r = 0.91; p < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, a value of R-to-D <1.69 kg/40 mg, but only <0.67 kg/40 mg for DR were significantly related to poor 6-month outcome (p = 0.04 and p = 0.05, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses demonstrated that DR and R-to-D are equivalent in predicting prognosis (area under curve (AUC): 0.39 and 0.40, respectively). Only R-to-D was inversely related to in-hospital stay (r = −0.23; p = 0.01). Conclusion: Adding diuresis to DR seemed to provide a better risk assessment in alive HF patients discharged after an acute decompensation.


2010 ◽  
pp. 153-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rinaldo Bellomo ◽  
John R. Prowle ◽  
Jorge E. Echeverri

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document