scholarly journals Factors associated with underuse of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: an analysis of 11 215 patients from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1326-1334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluigi Savarese ◽  
Juan-Jesus Carrero ◽  
Bertram Pitt ◽  
Stefan D. Anker ◽  
Giuseppe M.C. Rosano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Factors Associated

Abstract 040: Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists After Hospitalization of Patients With Heart Failure With a Reduced Ejection Fraction

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S Durstenfeld ◽  
Stuart D Katz ◽  
Hannah Park ◽  
Saul Blecker
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Secondary Diagnosis ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Principal Diagnosis ◽  
Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Before And After

Background: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are an important component of guideline-directed therapy for patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but are underutilized in clinical practice. Hospitalization is a quality-improvement opportunity to increase appropriate use of MRAs, particularly as this therapy is associated with reduced readmission following both hospitalizations with a principal and secondary diagnosis of heart failure. We studied MRA prescription for heart failure patients before and after hospitalization. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults hospitalized within an academic tertiary-care hospital system in 2013-2015 with a principal or secondary discharge diagnosis of heart failure. We included patients with ejection fraction ≤35%, systolic blood pressure ≥100 mm Hg, estimated glomerular filtration rate >30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , and potassium <5.0 mEq/L. We recorded MRA prescription before and after hospitalization. We used McNemar’s test to compare MRA prescription before and after hospitalization, with pre-specified principal and secondary diagnosis subgroups. We used the chi-square test to compare prescriptions between groups. Results: Among 1176 hospitalizations of patients who met the inclusion criteria, the mean age was 72.7±13.4 years and 366 (31%) were female. Of these patients, 303 (25.8%) were prescribed MRAs prior to hospitalization and 331 (28.2%) were prescribed them at discharge, a small but statistically significant increase (p=0.02). Among patients previously prescribed MRAs, 241 (79.5%) continued them at discharge. Among 873 patients not previously prescribed MRAs, 90 (10.3%) had MRAs initiated at discharge. Among 347 patients with a principal diagnosis of heart failure, 95 had MRAs continued, 27 had MRAs discontinued, and 39 had MRAs initiated, a non-significant increase of 12 patients (+3.6%, p=0.14). Among 829 patients with a secondary diagnosis, 146 had MRAs continued, 35 had MRAs discontinued, and 51 had MRAs initiated, a non-significant increase of 16 patients (+1.9%, p=0.08). More patients with a principal diagnosis received MRAs at discharge: 134/347 (38.6%) compared to 197/829 (23.7%) patients discharged with a secondary diagnosis of HFrEF, p<0.0001; similarly, patients with a principal diagnosis of HFrEF had higher rates of MRA initiation at discharge: 39/225 (17.3%) versus 51/648 (7.9%), p=0.0004. Conclusions: Over 70% of hospitalized HFrEF patients did not receive MRAs before or after hospitalization. Although more patients with a principal diagnosis than secondary diagnosis of heart failure received MRAs and had them initiated, over 80% of eligible patients not on MRAs were not initiated on them at discharge. Hospitalization remains an opportunity to identify patients indicated for MRAs and initiate guideline-directed heart failure pharmacotherapy.

scholarly journals Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Blood Pressure, and Outcomes in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Serenelli ◽  
Alice Jackson ◽  
Pooja Dewan ◽  
Pardeep S. Jhund ◽  
Mark C. Petrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

The Role of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (46) ◽  
pp. 5517-5524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasilios Papademetriou ◽  
Maria Toumpourleka ◽  
Konstantinos P. Imprialos ◽  
Sofia Alataki ◽  
Alexandros Manafis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a worldwide modern epidemic, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Several causes have been identified for the syndrome, most of which share common pathophysiologic pathways, including neurohormonal activation. Central to the latter lies activation of the reninangiotensin- aldosterone system, and its effects on cardiovascular disease progression. Objectives: The aim of this review is to summarize the pathophysiology of aldosterone and the effects of its blockage in the failing heart, as well as to provide state-of-the-art evidence, and address future perspectives regarding the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Method: Literature was reviewed for studies that assess the pathophysiology of aldosterone in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and the effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in this condition. Results: Several major society guidelines have synthesized the available evidence on HFrEF management, and drugs that block the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system at different levels continue to form the key component of standard of care for these patients. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are an important part of HFrEF pharmacologic treatment, and their use is supported by a high level of evidence studies. This class of drugs demonstrated significant benefits for morbidity and mortality, across the spectrum oh HFrEF, including patients after acute myocardial infarction. Conclusion: Current evidence supports the central role of aldosterone in HFrEF progression, and the significant benefits on outcomes with the use of MRAs.

Effect of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and with Reduced Ejection Fraction - A Narrative Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Mares ◽  
Tayana Rodriguez ◽  
Abhizith Deoker ◽  
Angelica Lehker ◽  
Debabrata Mukherjee
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background: Heart failure is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally. By end of this decade, ~8 million Americans will have heart failure, with an expenditure of $69.8 billion. Objective: In this narrative review, we evaluate the benefits, potential risks, and role of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRAs) in the management of both Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) and Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF). Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature review to assess the available evidence on the role of MRAs in heart failure using the online databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar). Results: Clinical evidence shows that MRAs, such as spironolactone and eplerenone, reduce mortality and readmissions for patients with HFrEF compared with placebo. Furthermore, one trial has reported that MRAs minimize heart failure hospitalization in patients with HFpEF. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines strongly recommend using MRA in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with Class II-IV symptoms, estimated glomerular filtration rate >30 ml/min/1.73 m2, and absence of hyperkalemia. Despite this, MRAs are underutilized in the management of heart failure. Conclusions: MRAs improve outcomes in patients with both HFpEF and HFrEF but remain underutilized.

Chronic heart failure: definitions, investigation, and management

2010 ◽  
pp. 2728-2728
Author(s):  
John G.F Cleland ◽  
Andrew L Clark
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Receptor Antagonists ◽  
High Concentrations

Heart failure is a common clinical syndrome, often presenting with breathlessness, fatigue and peripheral oedema. It is predominantly a disease of older people. The prevalence is increasing, exceeding 2% of the adult population in developed countries. The pathophysiology of heart failure is complex. A common feature is salt and water retention, possibly triggered by a relative fall in renal perfusion pressure. Common aetiologies include ischaemic heart disease, hypertension, and valvular heart disease. The early diagnosis of heart failure relies on a low threshold of suspicion and screening of people at risk before the onset of obvious symptoms or signs. In patients with suspected heart failure, routine investigation with electrocardiography and blood tests for urea and electrolytes, haemoglobin and BNP/NT-proBNP are recommended. Low plasma concentrations of BNP/NT-proBNP exclude most forms of heart failure. Intermediate or high concentrations should prompt referral for echocardiography to identify possible causes of heart failure and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients can be classified as reduced (<40%) LVEF (HFrEF), normal (>50%) LVEF (HFnEF), or borderline (40–50%) LVEF (HFbEF). Currently HFbEF and HFnEF are managed similarly by current guidelines. Treatable causes for heart failure (e.g. valvular disease, tachyarrhythmias, thyrotoxicosis, anaemia or hypertension) should be identified and corrected. Patients with heart failure will generally benefit from lifestyle advice (diet, exercise, vaccination). Pharmacological therapy is given to improve symptoms and prognosis. Diuretic therapy is the mainstay for control of congestion and symptoms; it may be life-saving for patients with acute heart failure but its effect on long-term prognosis is unknown. For patients with HFrEF, either angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or, more recently, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, combined with β‎-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (triple therapy) provide both symptomatic and prognostic benefit. Ivabridine may be added for those in sinus rhythm where the heart rate remains above 70 bpm. Whether digoxin still has a role in contemporary management is uncertain. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is appropriate for symptomatic patients with HFrEF if they are in sinus rhythm and have a broad QRS (>140 ms). Implantable defibrillators provide additional prognostic benefit in selected patients with an ejection fraction below 35%. For patients with HFnEF, treatments directed at comorbid conditions (e.g. hypertension, atrial fibrillation) and congestion (e.g. diuretics and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) are appropriate but there is no robust evidence that any treatment can improve prognosis. Heart transplantation or assist devices may be options for highly selected patients with endstage heart failure; many others may benefit from palliative care services. Effective management of chronic heart failure requires a coordinated multidisciplinary team, including heart failure nurse specialists, primary care physicians, and cardiologists. New treatments have improved the prognosis of heart failure substantially over the past two decades. The annual mortality is now probably less than 5% for patients with HFrEF receiving good contemporary care whose symptoms are stable and controlled. For patients with recurrent or recalcitrant congestion requiring admission to hospital, the prognosis is much worse. In-patient mortality is about 5% for those aged less than 75 years but threefold higher for older patients; mortality in the year after discharge ranges from 20% to 40% depending on age.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Kate O'Donovan
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System ◽  
Renin Angiotensin ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is associated with decreased functional capacity, poor quality of life and increased mortality risk. The neurohormonal compensatory response to a reduced cardiac output is mainly comprised of the sympathetic nervous system, natriuretic peptides and the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, which attempt to maintain peripheral perfusion. The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system is an integral mechanism in increasing afterload by promoting angiotensin II-mediated vasoconstriction and increasing preload via the secretion of aldosterone which causes sodium and water retention. Albeit compensatory mechanisms attempt to increase cardiac output and perfusion, their effects are maladaptive as left ventricular function deteriorates in response to an increased afterload, preload and ventricular remodelling. In an attempt to interrupt this vicious circle, first-line pharmacological therapy in the treatment of heart failure is beta blockade and inhibition of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. Integral to this treatment strategy are mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, also known as aldosterone antagonists. This class of drug inhibits the action of aldosterone, decreases preload and reduces left ventricular workload, thus preserving ventricular function. This translates into reduced mortality incidence, decreased episodes of hospitalisations for cardiac causes and improvement in clinical signs and symptoms. Although patient benefits are explicit, adverse effects such as hyperkalaemia and renal impairment are associated with this therapy. Regular patient follow up and monitoring for potential adverse effects and drug interactions are essential to the success of the therapy.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)

2015 ◽  
Vol 200 ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annalisa Capuano ◽  
Cristina Scavone ◽  
Cristiana Vitale ◽  
Liberata Sportiello ◽  
Francesco Rossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Receptor Antagonists
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document