scholarly journals Cytokine storm after heart transplantation in COVID‐19‐related haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Mahdavi ◽  
Golnar Mortaz Hejri ◽  
Hamidreza Pouraliakbar ◽  
Hossein Shahzadi ◽  
Mahshid Hesami ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihito Nihei ◽  
Hajime Nagasawa ◽  
Yusuke Fukao ◽  
Masao Kihara ◽  
Seiji Ueda ◽  
...  

Abstract The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is now a major global health threat. More than half a year have passed since the first discovery of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2), no effective treatment has been established especially in intensive care unit. Inflammatory cytokine storm caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported to play a central role in COVID-19; therefore, treatments for suppressing cytokines, including extracorporeal treatments, are considered to be beneficial. However, until today the efficacy of removing cytokines by extracorporeal treatments in patients with COVID-19 is unclear. Herein, we report our experience with a 66-year-old male patient undergoing maintenance peritoneal dialysis who became critically ill with COVID-19 and underwent several extracorporeal treatment approaches including plasma exchange, direct hemoperfusion using a polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column and continuous hemodiafiltration. Though the patient developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) repeatedly and subacute cerebral infarction and finally died for respiratory failure on day 30 after admission, these attempts appeared to dampen the cytokine storm based on the observed decline in serum IL-6 levels and were effective against ARDS and secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. This case suggests the significance of timely initiation of extracorporeal treatment approaches in critically ill patients with COVID-19.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Christian Danielsson ◽  
Kristjan Karason ◽  
Göran Dellgren

Abstract Background Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is an uncommon but serious systemic inflammatory response with high mortality rates. It can be triggered by malignancy or infectious agents, often in the context of immunosuppression. Literature covering HLH in heart transplantation (HTx) is scarce. Case summary A 25-year-old male with a history of celiac disease underwent HTx at Sahlgrenska Hospital in 2011 due to giant cell myocarditis and was treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisolone. He developed several episodes of acute cellular rejections (ACR) during the first 3 post-HTx years, which subsided after addition of everolimus. In May 2017, the patient was admitted to the hospital due to fever without focal symptoms. He had an extensive inflammatory reaction, but screening for infectious agents was negative. Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis was discussed early, but first dismissed since two bone marrow biopsies revealed no signs of haemophagocytosis. Increasing levels of soluble IL-2 were considered confirmative of the diagnosis. Even with intense immunosuppressant treatment, the patient deteriorated and died in progressive multiorgan failure within 2 weeks of the symptom onset. Discussion A 25-year-old HTx recipient with an extensive inflammatory response, fulfilled criteria for HLH, but the diagnosis was delayed due to normal bone marrow biopsies. A background with autoimmune reactivity and immunosuppressive therapy may have contributed to HLH, but the actual trigger was not identified. Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis can occur in HTx recipients in the absence of malignancy, identifiable infectious triggers and signs of haemophagocytosis. Early diagnosis and intervention are likely to be of importance for a favourable outcome.


RMD Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e001295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessia Alunno ◽  
Francesco Carubbi ◽  
Javier Rodríguez-Carrio

Some of the articles being published during the severe acute respiratory syndrome–coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 pandemic highlight a link between severe forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the so-called cytokine storm, also with increased ferritin levels. However, this scenario is more complex than initially thought due to the heterogeneity of hyperinflammation. Some patients with coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) develop a fully blown secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH), whereas others, despite a consistent release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, do not fulfil sHLH criteria but still show some features resembling the phenotype of the hyperferritinemic syndrome. Despite the final event (the cytokine storm) is shared by various conditions leading to sHLH, the aetiology, either infectious, autoimmune or neoplastic, accounts for the differences in the various phases of this process. Moreover, the evidence of a hyperinflammatory microenvironment provided the rationale to employ immunomodulating agents for therapeutic purposes in severe COVID-19. This viewpoint aims at discussing the pitfalls and issues to be considered with regard to the use of immunomodulating agents in COVID-19, such as timing of treatment based on the viral load and the extent of cytokine/ferritin overexpression. Furthermore, it encompasses recent findings in the paediatric field about a novel multisystem inflammatory disease resembling toxic shock syndrome and atypical Kawasaki disease observed in children with proven SARS-CoV2 infection. Finally, it includes arguments in favour of adding COVID-19 to the spectrum of the recently defined ‘hyperferritinemic syndrome’, which already includes adult-onset Still’s disease, macrophage activation syndrome, septic shock and catastrophic anti-phospholipid syndrome.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihito Nihei ◽  
Hajime Nagasawa ◽  
Yusuke Fukao ◽  
Masao Kihara ◽  
Seiji Ueda ◽  
...  

Abstract The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is now a major global health threat. More than half a year have passed since the first discovery of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2), no effective treatment has been established especially in intensive care unit. Inflammatory cytokine storm caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported to play a central role in COVID-19; therefore, treatments for suppressing cytokines, including extracorporeal treatments, are considered to be beneficial. However, until today the efficacy of removing cytokines by extracorporeal treatments in patients with COVID-19 is unclear. Herein, we report our experience with a 66-year-old male patient undergoing maintenance peritoneal dialysis who became critically ill with COVID-19 and underwent several extracorporeal treatment approaches including plasma exchange, direct hemoperfusion using a polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column and continuous hemodiafiltration. Though the patient developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) repeatedly and subacute cerebral infarction and finally died for respiratory failure on day 30 after admission, these attempts appeared to dampen the cytokine storm based on the observed decline in serum IL-6 levels and were effective against ARDS and secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. This case suggests the significance of timely initiation of extracorporeal treatment approaches in critically ill patients with COVID-19.


Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nee L Wong ◽  
Nick J Morley ◽  
David J Paling ◽  
Rachel S Tattersall

Abstract Background/Aims  Alemtuzumab is an efficacious therapy for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) preventing neural damage and reducing relapse rate by up to 74%. Administered in 2 treatment cycles 12 months apart and authorised for use in > 40 countries, it is a humanized monoclonal antibody selectively directed against the CD52 antigen of T- and B-Lymphocytes. Significant autoimmune effects of Alemtuzumab are reported 6-60 months post-treatment including secondary autoimmunity (40%), thyroid disease (18-26%), idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (1-3%) and anti-glomerular basement membrane disease (1%). There are 2 case reports of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis(HLH) in people with MS triggered by Alemtuzumab. HLH is a clinical syndrome of dysregulated, pathological overactivation of innate immunity leading to cytokine storm, multi-organ failure and a very high mortality rate. Clinical features are difficult to distinguish from, and may coexist with, other syndromes such as sepsis. Recognition requires a high index of clinical suspicion and management through multidisciplinary teams (MDT) using immune suppression. Early recognition and treatment improve outcome. Methods  We report a case of HLH in a 30-year-old female 1 year after her first cycle of alemtuzumab (second cycle delayed due to COVID-19 pandemic) for treatment of RRMS. She was well until presentation 2 days post gadolinium-contrasted routine MRI head scan with headache, fever, bacterial pneumonia/empyema and acute kidney injury. Febrile episodes persisted despite antibiotics. Results  Investigations revealed hepatosplenomegaly, pancytopenia (Haemoglobin: 80g/L, WBC: 0.9x109/L, neutrophils: 0.67x109/L, lymphocytes: 0.14 X109/L, platelets: 82x109/L), hypertriglyceridaemia (5.5mmol/L) and hyperferritinaemia (94023ng/ml). She fulfilled the Histiocyte Society HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria for HLH (H-score: 238). Initial treatment was IV methylprednisolone (1g) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) 2g/kg. Ferritin levels initially decreased (66933ng/ml) but re-escalated (93912ng/ml) with clinical deterioration, necessitating additional treatment with subcutaneous Anakinra 4mg/kg(recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist) alongside oral prednisolone 1mg/kg. There was rapid, sustained improvement with resolution of fever but ferritin levels remained highly elevated (45000ng/ml) and cytopaenia was slow to resolve. Marker T cell subsets showed significant T cell depression presumably post-alemtuzumab. MDT discussion locally and nationally through the HLH Across Speciality Collaboration (HASC) led to discharge with careful outpatient monitoring. Further IVIG 2g/kg was administered which led to complete resolution of HLH and treatment wean. Conclusion  HLH is an under-recognised complication of alemtuzumab therapy. Severe HLH requires both cytokine storm-directed treatment and identification/treatment of the trigger. Here, HLH was refractory to first line therapy (steroids and IVIG) and required immune modulation. The combination of alemtuzumab-induced immune dysregulation and sepsis were likely triggers, rather than Gadolinium. Supportive regional and national MDT input were required to guide therapy, especially as the patient wished to avoid etoposide (a standard refractory-HLH therapy) to preserve fertility. MDT working enabled early discharge with close monitoring in ambulatory care - a preferred outcome in the coronavirus pandemic. Disclosure  N.L. Wong: Grants/research support; In the last 5 years NLW has received educational grant to attend meetings from Eli Lilly. N.J. Morley: Grants/research support; In the last 5 years NJM has received speaker fees and educational grants to attend meetings from ROCHE, AMGEN, AbbVie, TAKEDA, Kite Gilead and Janssen. D.J. Paling: Grants/research support; DJP has recieved speaker fees and educational grants to attend meetings from Biogen, Novartis, Genzyme and Teva. R.S. Tattersall: Grants/research support; In the last 5 years RST has received speaker fees and educational grants to attend meetings from UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer and Janssen.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihito Nihei ◽  
Hajime Nagasawa ◽  
Yusuke Fukao ◽  
Masao Kihara ◽  
Seiji Ueda ◽  
...  

Abstract The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is now a major global health threat. More than half a year have passed since the first discovery of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2), no effective treatment has been established especially in intensive care unit. Inflammatory cytokine storm caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported to play a central role in COVID-19; therefore, treatments for suppressing cytokines, including extracorporeal treatments, are considered to be beneficial. However, until today the efficacy of removing cytokines by extracorporeal treatments in patients with COVID-19 is unclear. We herein report our experience with a 66-year-old male patient undergoing maintenance peritoneal dialysis who became critically ill with COVID-19 and underwent several extracorporeal treatment approaches including plasma exchange, direct hemoperfusion using a polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column and continuous hemodiafiltration. Though the patient developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) repeatedly and subacute cerebral infarction and finally died for respiratory failure on day 30 after admission, these attempts appeared to somewhat dampen the cytokine storm based on the observed decline in serum IL-6 levels and were effective against ARDS and secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. This case suggests the significance of timely initiation of extracorporeal treatment approaches in critical ill patients with COVID-19.


Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1202
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Obuchowska ◽  
Arkadiusz Standyło ◽  
Karolina Obuchowska ◽  
Żaneta Kimber-Trojnar ◽  
Bożena Leszczyńska-Gorzelak

The term ‘cytokine storm’ (CS) applies to a pathological autoimmune reaction when the interactions that lead to cytokine production are destabilised and may even lead to death. CS may be induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. In this study, we present our analysis of certain pathological processes that induce a CS in pregnant and postpartum women. We draw our attention to the similarities between the severe course of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). It is noteworthy that many of the criteria used to diagnose HLH are described as COVID-19 mortality predictors. Cytokine storms are considered to be an important cause of death in patients with the severe course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Due to the fact that pregnant women are in an immunosuppressive state, viral pulmonary infections are more perilous for them—possible risks include miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction or birth before the term; sometimes ventilation support is needed. HLH should be considered in pregnant and puerperal women suffering from moderately severe to severe COVID-19 and presenting with: fever unresponsive to antibiotic therapy, cytopenia, hepatitis and hyperferritinaemia. The HLH disorder is rare and difficult to diagnose; however, its early detection could reduce patient mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document