scholarly journals Health care utilization and mortality associated with heart failure‐related admissions among cancer patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 733-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avirup Guha ◽  
Amit Kumar Dey ◽  
Merna Armanious ◽  
Katherine Dodd ◽  
Janice Bonsu ◽  
...  
Cancer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4231-4240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle B. Rocque ◽  
Courtney P. Williams ◽  
Kelly M. Kenzik ◽  
Bradford E. Jackson ◽  
Andres Azuero ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan L Auener ◽  
Toine E P Remers ◽  
Simone A van Dulmen ◽  
Gert P Westert ◽  
Rudolf B Kool ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Chronic heart failure accounts for approximately 1%-2% of health care expenditures in most developed countries. These costs are primarily driven by hospitalizations and comorbidities. Telemonitoring has been proposed to reduce the number of hospitalizations and decrease the cost of treatment for patients with heart failure. However, the effects of telemonitoring on health care utilization remain unclear. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to study the effect of telemonitoring programs on health care utilization and costs in patients with chronic heart failure. We assess the effect of telemonitoring on hospitalizations, emergency department visits, length of stay, hospital days, nonemergency department visits, and health care costs. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies on noninvasive telemonitoring and health care utilization. We included studies published between January 2010 and August 2020. For each study, we extracted the reported data on the effect of telemonitoring on health care utilization. We used <i>P</i>&lt;.05 and CIs not including 1.00 to determine whether the effect was statistically significant. RESULTS We included 16 randomized controlled trials and 13 nonrandomized studies. Inclusion criteria, population characteristics, and outcome measures differed among the included studies. Most studies showed no effect of telemonitoring on health care utilization. The number of hospitalizations was significantly reduced in 38% (9/24) of studies, whereas emergency department visits were reduced in 13% (1/8) of studies. An increase in nonemergency department visits (6/9, 67% of studies) was reported. Health care costs showed ambiguous results, with 3 studies reporting an increase in health care costs, 3 studies reporting a reduction, and 4 studies reporting no significant differences. Health care cost reductions were realized through a reduction in hospitalizations, whereas increases were caused by the high costs of the telemonitoring program or increased health care utilization. CONCLUSIONS Most telemonitoring programs do not show clear effects on health care utilization measures, except for an increase in nonemergency outpatient department visits. This may be an unwarranted side effect rather than a prerequisite for effective telemonitoring. The consequences of telemonitoring on nonemergency outpatient visits should receive more attention from regulators, payers, and providers. This review further demonstrates the high clinical and methodological heterogeneity of telemonitoring programs. This should be taken into account in future meta-analyses aimed at identifying the effective components of telemonitoring programs.


2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi K. Goyal ◽  
Stephanie B. Wheeler ◽  
Racquel E. Kohler ◽  
Kristen H. Lich ◽  
Ching-Ching Lin ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 134-134
Author(s):  
Colleen C. Apostol ◽  
Julie Waldfogel ◽  
Elizabeth Pfoh ◽  
Donald C. List ◽  
Lynn Billing ◽  
...  

134 Background: Communication about care preferences is vital for care of cancer patients with advanced and refractory disease, particularly when they become ill enough to be at risk for critical care interventions potentially inconsistent with their preferences. It is vital to describe the use of goals of care discussions in patients with advanced/refractory cancer at risk for critical care and evaluate associations between these discussions and outcomes. Methods: Cohort study describing patient/families’ perceptions of goals of care meetings and comparing health care utilization outcomes of patients who did and who did not have discussions. Inpatient units of an academic cancer center included patients who had metastatic solid tumors or relapsed/refractory lymphoma or leukemia and were at risk for critical care (defined as requiring supplemental oxygen and/or a cardiac monitor). Results: Of 86 patients enrolled, 34 (39%) had a reported goals of care discussion. Patients/families reported their needs and goals were addressed moderately to quite a bit during the meetings. Patients with reported discussions were less likely to receive critical care (0% vs 22%, p=0.003) and more likely to be discharged to hospice (48% vs 30%, p=0.04). Only one patient with a goals of care discussion died during the index hospitalization (on comfort care) (3%) compared with 9% among those without discussions (p=0.08). Conclusions: Goals of care meetings should be incorporated into usual care for cancer patients with advanced or refractory disease at risk for critical care during a hospitalization, in order to improve concordance between care received and patient and family preferences. Goals of care meetings for advanced/refractory cancer inpatients at risk for critical care can address patient and family goals and needs and improve health care utilization outcomes. These meetings should be part of routine care in this patient population.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 488-488
Author(s):  
Nizar Bhulani ◽  
Ang Gao ◽  
Arjun Gupta ◽  
Jenny Jing Li ◽  
Chad Guenther ◽  
...  

488 Background: Prospective trials have shown that palliative care is associated with improved survival and quality of life, with lower rate of end-of-life health care utilization and cost. We examined trends in palliative care utilization in older pancreatic cancer patients. Methods: Pancreatic cancer patients with and without palliative care consults were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database between 2000 and 2009. Trend of palliative care use was studied. Emergency room and Intensive Care utilization and costs in the last 30 days of life were assessed. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Results: Of the 72205 patients with pancreatic cancer, 3383 (4.1%) received palliative care. The proportion of patients receiving palliative care increased from 1.8% in 2000 to 7.8% in 2009 (p for trend < 0.001). Patients with palliative care were more likely to be Asian and women. Of those who received palliative care, 73% received it in the last 30 days of life, and only 11% at least 12 weeks before death. The average number of visits to the ED in the last 30 days of life were significantly higher for patients who received palliative care (0.93±0.62) versus those who did not (0.79±0.61), p < 0.001, and had a significantly higher cost of care ($1317 vs $842, p < 0.001). Intensive care unit length of stay in the last 30 days of life did not differ between patients who did and did not receive palliative care (1.14 days vs 1.04 days, p 0.08). Intensive care unit cost of care was significantly higher for patients with palliative care compared to their counterparts ($5202.641 vs $3896.750, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Palliative care use for pancreatic cancer patients has increased between 2000 and 2009 in this study of Medicare patients. However, it was largely offered close to the end of life and was not associated with reduced health care utilization or cost. Early palliative care referral may be more beneficial.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith A. MacKenzie ◽  
Alexandra Hanlon

This study aimed to examine the role of diagnosis in health-care utilization patterns after hospice enrollment. Using 2007 National Home and Hospice Care Survey data from hospice patients with heart failure (n = 311) and cancer (n = 946), we analyzed emergency service use and discharge to hospital via logistic regression pre- and postpropensity score matching. Prematching, patients with heart failure had twice the odds of emergency services use than patients with cancer ( P < .001) and twice the odds of discharge to hospital ( P = .02). Differences were reduced postmatching for emergency service use (odds ratio [OR]: 1.6, P = .05) and eliminated for discharge to hospital (OR: 1.32, P = .45). Health-care utilization correlates included diagnosis, place of care, and advance directives. Attention to the unique needs of patients with heart failure is needed, along with improved advanced care planning.


2015 ◽  
Vol 70 (11) ◽  
pp. 1442-1447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander X. Lo ◽  
Kellie L. Flood ◽  
Richard E. Kennedy ◽  
Vera Bittner ◽  
Patricia Sawyer ◽  
...  

10.2196/26744 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. e26744
Author(s):  
Stefan L Auener ◽  
Toine E P Remers ◽  
Simone A van Dulmen ◽  
Gert P Westert ◽  
Rudolf B Kool ◽  
...  

Background Chronic heart failure accounts for approximately 1%-2% of health care expenditures in most developed countries. These costs are primarily driven by hospitalizations and comorbidities. Telemonitoring has been proposed to reduce the number of hospitalizations and decrease the cost of treatment for patients with heart failure. However, the effects of telemonitoring on health care utilization remain unclear. Objective This systematic review aims to study the effect of telemonitoring programs on health care utilization and costs in patients with chronic heart failure. We assess the effect of telemonitoring on hospitalizations, emergency department visits, length of stay, hospital days, nonemergency department visits, and health care costs. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies on noninvasive telemonitoring and health care utilization. We included studies published between January 2010 and August 2020. For each study, we extracted the reported data on the effect of telemonitoring on health care utilization. We used P<.05 and CIs not including 1.00 to determine whether the effect was statistically significant. Results We included 16 randomized controlled trials and 13 nonrandomized studies. Inclusion criteria, population characteristics, and outcome measures differed among the included studies. Most studies showed no effect of telemonitoring on health care utilization. The number of hospitalizations was significantly reduced in 38% (9/24) of studies, whereas emergency department visits were reduced in 13% (1/8) of studies. An increase in nonemergency department visits (6/9, 67% of studies) was reported. Health care costs showed ambiguous results, with 3 studies reporting an increase in health care costs, 3 studies reporting a reduction, and 4 studies reporting no significant differences. Health care cost reductions were realized through a reduction in hospitalizations, whereas increases were caused by the high costs of the telemonitoring program or increased health care utilization. Conclusions Most telemonitoring programs do not show clear effects on health care utilization measures, except for an increase in nonemergency outpatient department visits. This may be an unwarranted side effect rather than a prerequisite for effective telemonitoring. The consequences of telemonitoring on nonemergency outpatient visits should receive more attention from regulators, payers, and providers. This review further demonstrates the high clinical and methodological heterogeneity of telemonitoring programs. This should be taken into account in future meta-analyses aimed at identifying the effective components of telemonitoring programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document