scholarly journals Joint knowledge production for improved climate services: Insights from the Swedish forestry sector

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Åsa Gerger Swartling ◽  
Sandra Tenggren ◽  
Karin André ◽  
Olle Olsson
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Production ◽  
Climate Services ◽  
Forestry Sector ◽  
Joint Knowledge Production

Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Co-creation

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Rock ◽  
Mark McGuire ◽  
Alexandra Rogers
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Citizen Participation ◽  
Knowledge Production ◽  
Science Communication ◽  
Power Relations ◽  
Conceptual Models ◽  
Joint Knowledge Production

With its conceptual origins in marketing, design, and education, co-creation also has analogues in the fields of science and museology. Reviewing its development in these different disciplines highlights some common challenges (e.g., power relations) and benefits (e.g., joint knowledge production, critical thinking, and shared investment). Aligning this overview with conceptual models such as Arnstein’s ladder of citizen participation and Bakhtin’s carnival theory we aim to further inform the development of co-creation broadly within science communication.

Interdisciplinary collaboration and joint knowledge production in climate change adaptation in mountain regions in South Asia, Latin America and Switzerland

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Huggel ◽  
Veruska Muccione ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
South Asia ◽  
Knowledge Production ◽  
Climate Adaptation ◽  
Interdisciplinary Collaboration ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Solution Space ◽  
Climate Impacts ◽  
Adaptation To Climate Change ◽  
Joint Knowledge Production

<p>The level of already committed climate change implies massive impacts and risks to natural and human systems on the planet which probably have been underestimated so far, as recent research and science-policy assessments such as from the IPCC indicate. Scenarios with less stringent emission reduction pose even greater risks of partly unknown dimensions. Adaptation to climate change is therefore of critical importance, in particular for countries with low adaptive capacity where climate change can seriously undermine efforts for sustainable development. Mountains are among the hotspots of climate impacts and adaptation.</p><p>Climate adaptation is fundamentally an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary endeavor. Various sources of knowledge and perspectives need to be considered and integrated to produce actionable and solution-oriented knowledge. While experiences on joint knowledge production (JKP) has been increasing over recent years there is still missing clarity how to design and implement such a process in the context of climate adaptation.</p><p>Here we analyze experiences from a new initiative and network of climate adaptation in education and research with institutions from South Asia, the Andes and Central America, and Switzerland (knowledgeforclimate.net). Partners form a highly multi-disciplinary network with diverse cultural and institutional backgrounds which is both an important asset and challenge for interdisciplinary collaboration. A core of the collaboration are case studies conducted in all six countries in mountain contexts which are developed considering different disciplinary perspectives and represent the basis for both research and teaching. JKP takes place at different levels which need to be systematically and carefully analyzed. </p><p>We find that the processes of JKP are diverse, complex, and highly dependent on the interests and roles of actors within a network. To keep such processes alive, signposts in form of analysis and intermediary products along the network lifetime should be positioned as means of stocktaking and monitoring for the future.</p><p>We suggest that existing models of JKP need to be broadened to better accommodate the high diversity and non-linearity of JKP processes. JKP does not just happen as a product of interdisciplinary collaboration but needs continuous reflection, research, update and upgrade. Trust and a range of common interests among partners in the network have been identified as key aspects in the process. A particular challenge furthermore is to dedicate enough time and resources to the framing process but then clearly moving beyond into the action and solution space. Harmonizing different forms of knowledge pertinent to climate adaptation in mountains and harvesting the diversity while accepting possibly limited consensus is essential, yet, it is not a priori predictable where this balance lies.</p>

scholarly journals Loops and Building Blocks: a Knowledge co-Production Framework for Equitable Urban Health

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Audia ◽  
Frans Berkhout ◽  
George Owusu ◽  
Zahidul Quayyum ◽  
Samuel Agyei-Mensah
Keyword(s):  
Health Equity ◽  
Urban Health ◽  
Knowledge Production ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Policy Debate ◽  
Production Of Knowledge ◽  
Joint Knowledge Production

AbstractThis paper sets out a structured process for the co-production of knowledge between researchers and societal partners and illustrates its application in an urban health equity project in Accra, Ghana. The main insight of this approach is that research and knowledge co-production is always partial, both in the sense of being incomplete, as well as being circumscribed by the interests of participating researchers and societal partners. A second insight is that project-bound societal engagement takes place in a broader context of public and policy debate. The approach to co-production described here is formed of three recursive processes: co-designing, co-analysing, and co-creating knowledge. These ‘co-production loops’ are themselves iterative, each representing a stage of knowledge production. Each loop is operationalized through a series of research and engagement practices, which we call building blocks. Building blocks are activities and interaction-based methods aimed at bringing together a range of participants involved in joint knowledge production. In practice, recursive iterations within loops may be limited due of constraints on time, resources, or attention. We suggest that co-production loops and building blocks are deployed flexibly.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document