scholarly journals Intermediate disturbances are a key driver of long‐term tree demography across old‐growth temperate forests

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Nagel ◽  
Dejan Firm ◽  
Andrej Rozman
Oecologia ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 167 (3) ◽  
pp. 793-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven S. Perakis ◽  
Emily R. Sinkhorn ◽  
Jana E. Compton
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Heuck ◽  
Georg Smolka ◽  
Emily D. Whalen ◽  
Serita Frey ◽  
Per Gundersen ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 883-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
SIMON J. GROVE ◽  
STEPHEN M. TURTON ◽  
DANNY T. SIEGENTHALER

Tropical Cyclone ‘Rona’ crossed the coast of the Daintree lowlands of northeastern Australia in 1999. This study reports on its impact on forest canopy openness at six lowland rain forest sites with contrasting management histories (old-growth, selectively logged and regrowth). Percentage canopy openness was calculated from individual hemispherical photographs taken from marked points below the forest canopy at nine plots per site 3–4 mo before the cyclone, and at the same points a month afterwards. Before the cyclone, when nine sites were visited, canopy openness in old-growth and logged sites was similar, but significantly higher in regrowth forest. After the cyclone, all six revisited sites showed an increase in canopy openness, but the increase was very patchy amongst plots and sites and varied from insignificant to severe. The most severely impacted site was an old-growth one, the least impacted a logged one. Although proneness to impact was apparently related to forest management history (old-growth being the most impacted), underlying local topography may have had an equally strong influence in this case. It was concluded that the likelihood of severe impact may be determined at the landscape-scale by the interaction of anthropogenic with meteorological, physiographic and biotic factors. In the long term, such interactions may caution against pursuing forest management in cyclone-prone areas.


2022 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-26
Author(s):  
Tenley Conway ◽  
Jihan Khatib ◽  
Janele Tetreult ◽  
Andrew Almas

Many municipalities are working to protect and grow their urban forest, including adopting private tree regulations. Such regulations typically require property-owners to apply for a permit to remove trees and, if the permit is granted, plant replacement trees. Even with such regulations, many private trees are removed each year, particularly on residential property. Property-level construction activity, including expanding building footprints, replacing an older home with a new one, and increasing hardscaping, is emerging as a key driver of residential tree loss. This study addresses whether homeowners who receive a permit to remove one or more trees comply with the requirement to plant replacement trees to better understand the effect of private tree regulation. We explore this question through a written survey of homeowners who received a tree removal permit and site visits in Toronto (Ontario, Canada). While 70% of all survey participants planted the required replacement trees 2 to 3 years after receiving the permit, only 54% of homeowners whose permit was associated with construction planted. Additionally, most replacement trees were in good health but were dominated by a few genera. We also found significant differences in replacement planting and tree survival across the city’s 4 management districts. This study highlights that if resources supporting private tree regulations are limited, tree permits associated with construction should be prioritized for follow-up. Additionally, guidance about diverse species to plant should be communicated to ensure that private tree regulations are supporting the long-term protection of the urban forest.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest D. Osburn ◽  
Steven G. McBride ◽  
Frank O. Aylward ◽  
Brian D. Badgley ◽  
Brian D. Strahm ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 399 ◽  
pp. 197-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Jaloviar ◽  
Milan Saniga ◽  
Stanislav Kucbel ◽  
Ján Pittner ◽  
Jaroslav Vencurik ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanweer Akram ◽  
Anupam Das

This paper investigates the long-term determinants of the nominal yields of Indian government bonds (IGBs). It examines whether John Maynard Keynes’ supposition that the short-term interest rate is the key driver of the long-term government bond yield holds over the long run, after controlling for key economic factors. It also appraises if the government fiscal variable has an adverse effect on government bond yields over the long run. The models estimated in this paper show that in India the short-term interest rate is the key driver of the long-term government bond yield over the long run. However, the government debt ratio does not have any discernible adverse effect on IGB yields over the long run. These findings will help policy makers to (i) use information on the current trend of the short-term interest rate and other key macro variables to form their long-term outlook about IGB yields, and (ii) understand the policy implications of the government's fiscal stance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document