scholarly journals Spatially explicit models of seasonal habitat for greater sage‐grouse at broad spatial scales: Informing areas for management in Nevada and northeastern California

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter S. Coates ◽  
Brianne E. Brussee ◽  
Mark A. Ricca ◽  
John P. Severson ◽  
Michael L. Casazza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Spatially Explicit ◽  
Sage Grouse ◽  
Spatially Explicit Models

Mapping sage-grouse fence-collision risk: Spatially explicit models for targeting conservation implementation

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 409-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan S. Stevens ◽  
David E. Naugle ◽  
Brian Dennis ◽  
John W. Connelly ◽  
Tim Griffiths ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatially Explicit ◽  
Collision Risk ◽  
Sage Grouse ◽  
Spatially Explicit Models

scholarly journals Lessons learned from comparing spatially explicit models and the Partners in Flight approach to estimate population sizes of boreal birds in Alberta, Canada

The Condor ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Péter Sólymos ◽  
Judith D Toms ◽  
Steven M Matsuoka ◽  
Steven G Cumming ◽  
Nicole K S Barker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Population Estimates ◽  
Spatially Explicit ◽  
Species Variation ◽  
Detection Distance ◽  
Spatially Explicit Models ◽  
Population Sizes ◽  
Partners In Flight

Abstract Estimating the population abundance of landbirds is a challenging task complicated by the amount, type, and quality of available data. Avian conservationists have relied on population estimates from Partners in Flight (PIF), which primarily uses roadside data from the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS). However, the BBS was not designed to estimate population sizes. Therefore, we set out to compare the PIF approach with spatially explicit models incorporating roadside and off-road point-count surveys. We calculated population estimates for 81 landbird species in Bird Conservation Region 6 in Alberta, Canada, using land cover and climate as predictors. We also developed a framework to evaluate how the differences between the detection distance, time-of-day, roadside count, and habitat representation adjustments explain discrepancies between the 2 estimators. We showed that the key assumptions of the PIF population estimator were commonly violated in this region, and that the 2 approaches provided different population estimates for most species. The average differences between estimators were explained by differences in the detection-distance and time-of-day components, but these adjustments left much unexplained variation among species. Differences in the roadside count and habitat representation components explained most of the among-species variation. The variation caused by these factors was large enough to change the population ranking of the species. The roadside count bias needs serious attention when roadside surveys are used to extrapolate over off-road areas. Habitat representation bias is likely prevalent in regions sparsely and non-representatively sampled by roadside surveys, such as the boreal region of North America, and thus population estimates for these regions need to be treated with caution for certain species. Additional sampling and integrated modeling of available data sources can contribute towards more accurate population estimates for conservation in remote areas of North America.

scholarly journals Incoherent dimensionality in fisheries management: consequences of misaligned stock assessment and population boundaries

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron M Berger ◽  
Jonathan J Deroba ◽  
Katelyn M Bosley ◽  
Daniel R Goethel ◽  
Brian J Langseth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Population Structure ◽  
Stock Assessment ◽  
Spatially Explicit ◽  
Spatial Simulation ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Spatially Explicit Models ◽  
Fisheries Policy ◽  
Simulation Estimation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Dynamic Population

Abstract Fisheries policy inherently relies on an explicit definition of management boundaries that delineate the spatial extent over which stocks are assessed and regulations are implemented. However, management boundaries tend to be static and determined by politically negotiated or historically identified population (or multi-species) units, which create a potential disconnect with underlying, dynamic population structure. The consequences of incoherent management and population or stock boundaries were explored through the application of a two-area spatial simulation–estimation framework. Results highlight the importance of aligning management assessment areas with underlying population structure and processes, especially when fishing mortality is disproportionate to vulnerable biomass among management areas, demographic parameters (growth and maturity) are not homogenous within management areas, and connectivity (via recruitment or movement) unknowingly exists among management areas. Bias and risk were greater for assessments that incorrectly span multiple population segments (PSs) compared to assessments that cover a subset of a PS, and these results were exacerbated when there was connectivity between PSs. Directed studies and due consideration of critical PSs, spatially explicit models, and dynamic management options that help align management and population boundaries would likely reduce estimation biases and management risk, as would closely coordinated management that functions across population boundaries.

Improving management advice through spatially explicit models and sharing information

2009 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Montenegro ◽  
Mark N. Maunder ◽  
Maximiliano Zilleruelo
Keyword(s):  
Spatially Explicit ◽  
Spatially Explicit Models ◽  
Management Advice

scholarly journals Greater Sage-Grouse nest bowls buffer microclimate in a post-megafire landscape although effects on nest survival are marginal

The Condor ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R Anthony ◽  
Christian A Hagen ◽  
Katie M Dugger ◽  
R Dwayne Elmore
Keyword(s):  
Site Selection ◽  
Nest Site ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Nest Success ◽  
Nest Survival ◽  
Nest Site Selection ◽  
Bare Ground ◽  
Sage Grouse ◽  
Burned Areas ◽  
Visual Obstruction

Abstract Temperature at fine spatial scales is an important driver of nest site selection for many avian species during the breeding season and can influence nest success. Sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) communities have areas with high levels of vegetation heterogeneity and high thermal variation; however, fire removes vegetation that provides protection from predators and extreme environmental conditions. To examine the influence of microclimates on Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) nest site selection and nest success in a fire-affected landscape, we measured black bulb temperature (Tbb) and vegetation attributes (e.g., visual obstruction) at 3 spatial scales (i.e. nest bowl, microsite, and landscape) in unburned and burned areas. Nest bowls exhibited greater buffering of Tbb than both nearby microsites and the broader landscape. Notably, nest bowls were warmer in cold temperatures, and cooler in hot temperatures, than nearby microsites and the broader landscape, regardless of burn stage. Nest survival (NS) was higher for nests in unburned areas compared to nests in burned areas (unburned NS = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33–0.54; burned NS = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.10–0.46). The amount of bare ground was negatively associated with NS, but effects diminished as the amount of bare ground reached low levels. Shrub height and visual obstruction were positively associated with NS during the entire study period, whereas minimum Tbb had a weaker effect. Our findings demonstrate that thermoregulatory selection by Greater Sage-Grouse at nest sites had marginal effects on their NS. However, given that increases in vegetation structure (e.g., shrub height) provide thermal refuge and increase NS, vegetation remnants or regeneration in a post-fire landscape could be critical to Greater Sage-Grouse nesting ecology.

An Object-Oriented Approach to Managing Fuzziness in Spatially Explicit Models Coupled to a Geographic Database

2011 ◽  
pp. 269-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent B. Robinson ◽  
Phil A. Graniero
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Data ◽  
Spatial Databases ◽  
Ecological Modeling ◽  
Simulation Models ◽  
Spatially Explicit ◽  
Loosely Coupled ◽  
Spatially Explicit Models ◽  
Modeling Problem ◽  
Object Oriented Approach ◽  
Oriented Approach

This chapter uses a spatially explicit, individual-based ecological modeling problem to illustrate an approach to managing fuzziness in spatial databases that accommodates the use of nonfuzzy as well as fuzzy representations of geographic databases. The approach taken here uses the Extensible Component Objects for Constructing Observable Simulation Models (ECO-COSM) system loosely coupled with geographic information systems. ECO-COSM Probe objects flexibly express the contents of a spatial database within the context of an individualized fuzzy schema. It affords the ability to transform traditional nonfuzzy spatial data into fuzzy sets that capture the uncertainty inherent in the data and model’s semantic structure. The ecological modeling problem was used to illustrate how combining Probes and ProbeWrappers with Agent objects affords a flexible means of handling semantic variation and is an effective approach to utilizing heterogeneous sources of spatial data.

scholarly journals Conservation planning with spatially explicit models: a case for horseshoe bats in complex mountain landscapes

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 1005-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Le Roux ◽  
Mathilde Redon ◽  
Frédéric Archaux ◽  
Jed Long ◽  
Stéphane Vincent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conservation Planning ◽  
Spatially Explicit ◽  
Spatially Explicit Models ◽  
Mountain Landscapes ◽  
Horseshoe Bats
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document