scholarly journals Disparities in self‐reported eating disorders and academic impairment in sexual and gender minority college students relative to their heterosexual and cisgender peers

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Simone ◽  
Autumn Askew ◽  
Katherine Lust ◽  
Marla E. Eisenberg ◽  
Emily M. Pisetsky
Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 2388
Author(s):  
Sara Murphy ◽  
Jesse Stabile Morrell

Sexual and gender minority college students are underrepresented in nutrition research and may face unique challenges related to eating which impact their overall diet quality. We assessed the differences in eating competence and dietary intake between sexual and gender minority (SGM) and cisgender heterosexual (CH) college students. Participants (n = 2645) reported sexual orientation, gender identity and completed the Eating Competence Satter Inventory (ecSI 2.0™ through an online questionnaire. Three-day food records examined dietary intake. Intake was compared to recommendations for nutrients of public health concern. Chi-square and ANCOVA examined differences between eating competence and dietary intake. There were no differences in total ecSI 2.0™ scores. Subscale scores for Eating Attitudes and Contextual Skills were significantly higher in CH vs. SGM students (13.4 ± 0.1 vs. 12.4 ± 0.4 p = 0.01 and 10.7 ± 0.1 vs. 9.9 ± 0.3, p = 0.01, respectively). Most students (40.8%) met one nutrient recommendation. The proportion of students meeting nutrient recommendations were similar for SGM and CH. SGM populations may struggle with attitudes and eating behaviors. Dietary intake of SGM and CH students were similarly inadequate when compared to recommendations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephine T Hinds ◽  
Alexandra Loukas ◽  
Cheryl L Perry

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 1041-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam G. Horwitz ◽  
Johnny Berona ◽  
Danielle R. Busby ◽  
Daniel Eisenberg ◽  
Kai Zheng ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Todd G. Morrison ◽  
Joshua W. Katz ◽  
Yaser Mirzaei ◽  
Somayyeh Zare

This chapter reviews current literature pertaining to body image and pathogenic eating practices among sexual and gender minority populations. The authors begin by detailing three dominant theoretical frameworks that have been used to particularize why some sexual and gender minority persons are at risk of body dissatisfaction and disordered eating—the minority stress model, sociocultural theory, and objectification theory—as well as the pantheoretical model of dehumanization. Then, to highlight dominant trends in the literature, the authors summarize narrative and meta-analytic reviews on body image and eating disorders that target gay men, lesbian women, bisexual persons, and trans persons. The authors conclude by detailing obstacles that prevent researchers from better grasping the corporeal psychology of sexual and gender minority persons. These obstacles include (1) inconsistent and ambiguous operationalizing of constructs such as the “gay community”—constructs that are often invoked to explain why sexual and gender minority persons are at risk; (2) reliance on outdated measures of sexual orientation; (3) the elision of bisexual persons in body image scholarship; (4) the limited attention that is paid to the variability existing within sexual and gender minoritized groups; (5) the absence of research focusing on the dynamics of intersectionality as they pertain to the body; and (6) the lack of studies conducted outside of the United States.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document