scholarly journals Comparisons of bone density and body composition among adolescents with anorexia nervosa and atypical anorexia nervosa

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 591-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. Nagata ◽  
Jennifer L. Carlson ◽  
Neville H. Golden ◽  
Jin Long ◽  
Stuart B. Murray ◽  
...  
1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (S1) ◽  
pp. 177-177
Author(s):  
P. Schneider ◽  
J. Rendl ◽  
M. Luster ◽  
M. Geling ◽  
Chr Reiners

1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (S1) ◽  
pp. 289-289
Author(s):  
P. Schneider ◽  
J. Rendl ◽  
M. Luster ◽  
M. Geling ◽  
Chr Reiners

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Schorr ◽  
Jennifer J. Thomas ◽  
Kamryn T. Eddy ◽  
Laura E. Dichtel ◽  
Elizabeth A. Lawson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Katherine N. Bachmann ◽  
Melanie Schorr ◽  
Alexander G. Bruno ◽  
Miriam A. Bredella ◽  
Elizabeth A. Lawson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Isaksson ◽  
Ata Ghaderi ◽  
Martina Wolf-Arehult ◽  
Mia Ramklint

Abstract Background Personality has been suggested to be an important factor in understanding onset, maintenance, and recovery from eating disorders (ED). The objective of the current study was to evaluate personality style in different ED diagnostic groups as classified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth edition (DSM-5). Methods The overcontrolled, undercontrolled, and resilient personality styles were compared in four groups of patients with EDs: anorexia nervosa restricting (ANr) (n = 34), anorexia nervosa binge eating/purging (ANbp) (n = 31), atypical anorexia nervosa (AAN) (n = 29), and bulimia nervosa (BN) (n = 76). These groups were compared with a group of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) (n = 108), and a non-clinical group (NC) (n = 444). Patient data were collected at two outpatient clinics in Uppsala, Sweden. NC control data were collected through convenience sampling. Participants filled out questionnaires assessing personality style. Results The main findings were more pronounced overcontrol reported by the ANr and AAN groups compared with the BN, BPD, and NC groups, and no significant difference in resilience between the ED and the NC groups. Considerable variability of over- and undercontrol was also found within each group. Conclusions The results replicate previous findings when EDs are classified according to current diagnostic criteria (DSM-5). Taking personality styles into account may improve our understanding of certain characteristics in EDs, such as social deficits and rigidity that are attributed to poor treatment outcome.


2002 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate P Kerruish ◽  
Janice O'Connor ◽  
Ian RJ Humphries ◽  
Michael R Kohn ◽  
Simon D Clarke ◽  
...  

Bone ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 692
Author(s):  
P. Todd ◽  
B. Bloom ◽  
M. Buxton-Thomas ◽  
C. Moniz ◽  
P. Pitt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document