scholarly journals Are obsessive-compulsive personality traits associated with a poor outcome in anorexia nervosa? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and naturalistic outcome studies

2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 581-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna M. Crane ◽  
Marion E. Roberts ◽  
Janet Treasure
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anorexia Nervosa ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Personality Traits ◽  
Outcome Studies ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Poor Outcome

Treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials – CORRIGENDUM

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 701-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart B. Murray ◽  
Daniel S. Quintana ◽  
Katharine L. Loeb ◽  
Scott Griffiths ◽  
Daniel Le Grange
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anorexia Nervosa ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Efficacy of post-inpatient aftercare treatments for anorexia nervosa: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin E. Giel ◽  
Simone C. Behrens ◽  
Kathrin Schag ◽  
Peter Martus ◽  
Stephan Herpertz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anorexia Nervosa ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Inpatient Treatment ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Self Help ◽  
Inpatient And Outpatient Care

Abstract Background Early relapse after inpatient treatment is a serious problem in the management of anorexia nervosa (AN). Specialized aftercare interventions have the potential to bridge the gap between inpatient and outpatient care, to prevent relapse and to improve the long-term outcome for patients with AN. Methods Following the guidelines of the PRISMA statement, we conducted a systematic review, synthesizing the evidence from randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of post-inpatient aftercare treatments for AN. Results Our search resulted in seven RCTs and three registered ongoing trials. Pharmacotherapy and low-threshold guided self-help have limited uptake and high dropout. Novel mobile guided self-help approaches seem promising due to high patient satisfaction, but their efficacy has yet to be investigated in larger trials. Cognitive-behavior psychotherapy may be beneficial in delaying relapse, but evidence is based on a single study. Conclusion Only a limited number of RCTs investigating aftercare interventions for patients with AN is available. There is no clear evidence favoring any one specific approach for post-inpatient aftercare in adult patients with AN. The field faces many challenges which generally affect intervention research in AN. A specific issue is how to increase uptake of and reduce dropout from aftercare interventions. This calls for better tailoring of interventions to patient needs and the integration of patient perspectives into treatment. Intensified research and care efforts are needed to address the problem of recurrent relapse after intensive inpatient treatment for AN and to eventually improve prognosis for this eating disorder.

Anorexia nervosa treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 310-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia M. Bulik ◽  
Nancy D. Berkman ◽  
Kimberly A. Brownley ◽  
Jan A. Sedway ◽  
Kathleen N. Lohr
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anorexia Nervosa ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Homeopathic Outcome Studies in Patients with HIV/AIDS

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (42) ◽  
pp. 2-12
Author(s):  
Subhranil Saha ◽  
Malay Mundle ◽  
Shubhamoy Ghosh ◽  
Munmun Koley ◽  
Sk. Intaj Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Outcome Studies ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Hiv Aids

Background & Aim: Systematic reviews of high-quality randomized controlled trials are crucial to evidence-based medicine. The objective of this review is to test whether there is enough evidence of efficacy of homeopathy from conducted clinical trials in humans suffering from HIV/AIDS. Methods: The study design was criteria-based systematic review of cumulative research and assessment of the methodological quality of only 5 published clinical trials and one review article. Among the clinical outcome studies, 3 studies were of open-label, non-randomized, non-controlled format, 2 were randomized controlled trials and one was a set of replication study. The qualities of the trials were evaluated using a list of validated and pre-defined criteria of good methodology, and the outcomes of the trials were interpreted in relation to their quality. Main outcome measures were methodological qualities in terms of consideration of threats to external, internal, construct and statistical conclusion validity. Results: Trials were too few in number and were not of very high quality. The results showed a positive trend regardless of the quality of the trial or the variety of homeopathy used. The results of this review may be complicated by publication bias. Conclusions: At this moment, the evidences are not sufficient to draw definitive conclusions. So, further evaluation of homeopathy by well-performed controlled trials of high methodological quality is required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document