Periodontal risk markers in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilija Jensen ◽  
Gabrielle Allen ◽  
Jana Bednarz ◽  
Jennifer Couper ◽  
Alexia Peña
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Markers ◽  
Periodontal Risk

scholarly journals Circulating serum and plasma levels of micro‐RNA in type‐1 diabetes in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosmas Margaritis ◽  
Georgia Margioula‐Siarkou ◽  
Chrysoula Margioula‐Siarkou ◽  
Stamatios Petousis ◽  
Eleni P. Kotanidou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Micro Rna

scholarly journals Type 1 diabetes incidence trends in children and adolescents aged 0–14 years in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e054962
Author(s):  
Ana Díez‐Fernández ◽  
Marta Carolina Ruiz-Grao ◽  
Arthur Eumann Mesas ◽  
Vicente Martinez-Vizcaino ◽  
Miriam Garrido-Miguel
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
National Income ◽  
Diabetes Incidence ◽  
Incidence Trends ◽  
Observational Cohort

IntroductionMonitoring type 1 diabetes (T1D) trends across most European countries using objectively measured data and how this incidence has evolved over the past three decades should be considered a public health priority. This study protocol provides a standardised and transparent methodology to assess TD1 trends among 0–14-year-old children and adolescents across Europe from 1994 to 2021.Methods and analysisThis protocol is guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols and the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. The literature search will be conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science databases from 1994 to 2021. Observational cohort studies providing incidence rates for European children and adolescents diagnosed with T1D aged ≤14.9 years and studies written in English, Spanish or Portuguese will be included. The risk of bias of the included studies will be assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Subgroup analyses will be performed based on gender, age, study year, country or European region. Metaregression analysis will be conducted using economic and geographic variables, such as gross national income of the country or geographic latitude.Ethics and disseminationThe systematic review based on this protocol will provide a comprehensive description of T1D incidence trends in children and adolescents across Europe from 1994 to 2021. The results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and in mass media. This study will exclusively use data from published research, so institutional ethical approval is not required.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021239480.

Subclinical Arterial Damage in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Z. Giannopoulou ◽  
Ioannis Doundoulakis ◽  
Christina Antza ◽  
Athanasios Christoforidis ◽  
Anna Bettina Haidich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Arterial Damage

Time in range for multiple technologies in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Pease ◽  
Clement Lo ◽  
Arul Earnest ◽  
Velislava Kiriakova ◽  
Danny Liew ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Closed Loop ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Glucose Testing ◽  
Closed Loop Systems ◽  
Percent Time ◽  
Time In Range

<b>Background: </b>Time-in-range is a key glycaemic metric, and comparisons of management technologies for this outcome are critical to guide device selection. <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Purpose: </b>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare and rank technologies for time in glycaemic ranges.</p> <p> </p> <p><b>Data sources: </b>We searched All Evidenced Based Medicine Reviews, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process and other non-indexed citations, PROSPERO, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science until 24 April, 2019.</p> <p> </p> <p><b>Study selection: </b>We included randomised controlled trials <u>></u>2 weeks duration comparing technologies for management of type 1 diabetes in adults (<u>></u>18 years of age), excluding pregnant women. </p> <p> </p> <p><b>Data extraction: </b>Data were extracted using a predefined template. Outcomes were percent time with sensor glucose levels 3.9–10.0mmol/l (70–180mg/dL), >10.0mmol/L (180mg/dL), and <3.9mmol/L (70mg/dL). </p> <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Data synthesis: </b>We identified 16,772 publications, of which 14 eligible studies compared eight technologies comprising 1,043 participants. Closed loop systems lead to greater percent time-in-range than any other management strategy and was 17.85 (95% predictive interval [PrI] 7.56–28.14) higher than usual care of multiple daily injections with capillary glucose testing. Closed loop systems ranked best for percent time-in-range or above range utilising surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA–98.5 and 93.5 respectively). Closed loop systems also ranked highly for time below range (SUCRA–62.2). </p> <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Limitations: </b>Overall risk of bias ratings were moderate for all outcomes. Certainty of evidence was very low.</p> <p><b> </b></p> <p><b>Conclusions: </b>In the first integrated comparison of multiple management strategies considering time-in-range, we found that the efficacy of closed loop systems appeared better than all other approaches. </p>

scholarly journals Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Possibilities of Prevention and Treatment: A Systematic Review

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1782
Author(s):  
Monika Grabia ◽  
Renata Markiewicz-Żukowska ◽  
Katarzyna Socha
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Overweight And Obesity ◽  
Excess Body Weight ◽  
Healthy Population ◽  
Prevention And Treatment

Overweight and obesity are an increasingly common problem, not only among the healthy population, but also in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). Excess body weight is related to many cardiometabolic complications as well as a high risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS). The purpose of this systematic review is to provide a concise and critical overview of the prevalence of MetS in children and adolescents with T1DM and, ultimately, to discuss prevention and treatment options. The study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. This review shows that, apart from the growing percentage of overweight and obese children and adolescents with T1DM (on average 20.1% and 9.5%, respectively), the problem of the increasing incidence of MetS (range from 3.2 to 29.9%, depending on the criteria used) is one of the most important phenomena of our time. One of the methods of prevention and treatment is a combined approach: changing eating habits and lifestyle, but there are also reports about the beneficial effects of the gut microflora.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document