scholarly journals Diagnostic yield of ThinPrep preparation in the assessment of fine-needle aspiration biopsy of salivary gland neoplasms

2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Hipp ◽  
Beatrice Lee ◽  
Matthew E. Spector ◽  
Xin Jing
Head & Neck ◽  
2009 ◽  
pp. NA-NA ◽  
Author(s):  
Rikke Kølby Christensen ◽  
Kristine Bjørndal ◽  
Christian Godballe ◽  
Annelise Krogdahl

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate O'Connor ◽  
Danny G. Cheriyan ◽  
Hector H. Li-Chang ◽  
Steven E. Kalloger ◽  
John Garrett ◽  
...  

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) is the preferred method for biopsying the gastrointestinal tract, and rapid on-site cytological evaluation is considered standard practice. Our institution does not perform on-site evaluation; this study analyzes our overall diagnostic yield, accuracy, and incidence of nondiagnostic cases to determine the validity of this strategy. Design: Data encompassing clinical information, procedural records, and cytological assessment were analyzed for gastrointestinal EUS-FNA procedures (n = 85) performed at Vancouver General Hospital from January 2012 to January 2013. We compared our results with those of studies that had on-site evaluation and studies that did not have on-site evaluation. Results: Eighty-five biopsies were performed in 78 patients, from sites that included the pancreas, the stomach, the duodenum, lymph nodes, and retroperitoneal masses. Malignancies were diagnosed in 45 (53%) biopsies, while 24 (29%) encompassed benign entities. Suspicious and atypical results were recorded in 8 (9%) and 6 (7%) cases, respectively. Only 2 (2%) cases received a cytological diagnosis of ‘nondiagnostic'. Our overall accuracy was 72%, our diagnostic yield was 98%, and our nondiagnostic rate was 2%. Our results did not significantly differ from those of studies that did have on-site evaluation. Conclusion: Our study highlights that adequate diagnostic accuracy can be achieved without on-site evaluation.


1995 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 294-297
Author(s):  
Satoru SHINTANI ◽  
Hidehiro MATSUURA ◽  
Yasuhisa HASEGAWA ◽  
Bin NAKAYAMA ◽  
Satoko OTAKE

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document