Women's decision making about antidepressant use during pregnancy: A narrative review

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 1158-1167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catriona Hippman ◽  
Lynda G. Balneaves
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Antidepressant Use

Patient's decision making regarding antidepressant use

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Dijkstra ◽  
M. Jaspers ◽  
M. van Zwieten
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Antidepressant Use

scholarly journals Communication and cognitive impairments and health care decision making in MND: A narrative review

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1182-1192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Paynter ◽  
Madeline Cruice ◽  
Susan Mathers ◽  
Heidi Gregory ◽  
Adam P. Vogel
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cognitive Impairments ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Health Care Decision ◽  
Care Decision

scholarly journals Management of Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Ablation for Spine Pain: Physician Survey and Review of Guidelines

2020 ◽  
Vol 4;23 (7;4) ◽  
pp. E335-E342
Author(s):  
Jason Friedrich
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Risk Mitigation ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Mitigation Strategies ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Electrical Devices ◽  
Risk Mitigation Strategies

Background: More patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs) are presenting to spine and pain practices for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures for chronic pain. Although the potential for electromagnetic interference (EMI) affecting CIED function is known with RFA procedures, available guidelines do not specifically address CIED management for percutaneous RFA for zygapophyseal (z-joint) joint pain, and thus physician practice may vary. Objectives: To better understand current practices of physicians who perform RFA for chronic z-joint pain with respect to management of CIEDs. Perioperative CIED management guidelines are also reviewed to specifically address risk mitigation strategies for potential EMI created by ambulatory percutaneous spine RFA procedures. Study Design: Web-based provider survey and narrative review. Setting: Multispecialty pain clinic, academic medical center. Methods: A web-based survey was created using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). A survey link was provided via e-mail to active members of the Spine Intervention Society (SIS), American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, as well as distributed freely to community Pain Physicians and any receptive academic departments of PM&R or Anesthesiology. The narrative review summarizes pertinent case series, review articles, a SIS recommendation statement, and multi-specialty peri-operative guidelines as they relate specifically to spine RFA procedures. Results: A total of 197 clinicians participated in the survey from diverse clinical backgrounds, including anesthesiology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, radiology, neurosurgery, and neurology, with 81% reporting fellowship training. Survey responses indicate wide variability in provider management of CIEDs before, during, and after RFA for z-joint pain. Respondents indicated they would like more specific guidelines to aid in management and decision-making around CIEDs and spine RFA procedures. Literature review yielded several practice guidelines related to perioperative management of CIEDs, but no specific guideline for percutaneous spine RFA procedures. However, combining the risk mitigation strategies provided in these guidelines, with interventional pain physician clinical experience allows for reasonable management recommendations to aid in decision-making. Limitations: Although this manuscript can serve as a review of CIEDs and aid in management decisions in patients with CIEDs, it is not a clinical practice guideline. Conclusions: Practice patterns vary regarding CIED management in ambulatory spine RFA procedures. CIED presence is not a contraindication for spine RFA but does increase the complexity of a spine RFA procedure and necessitates some added precautions. Key words: Radiofrequency ablation, neurotomy, cardiac implantable electrical device, zygapophyseal joint, spondylosis, neck pain, low back pain, chronic pain

scholarly journals Shared decision-making in peri-operative medicine: a narrative review

Anaesthesia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sturgess ◽  
J. T. Clapp ◽  
L. A. Fleisher
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Operative Medicine

Optimizing vascular-access device decision-making in the era of midline catheters

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 674-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Cawcutt ◽  
Richard J. Hankins ◽  
Teresa A. Micheels ◽  
Mark E. Rupp
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Access Device ◽  
Vascular Access Device ◽  
Intravenous Catheters

AbstractThis narrative review addresses vascular access device choice from peripheral intravenous catheters through central venous catheters, including the evolving use of midline catheters. The review incorporates best practices, published algorithms, and complications extending beyond CLABSI and phlebitis to assist clinicians in navigating complex vascular access decisions.

scholarly journals Eccentric Exercise for Achilles Tendinopathy: A Narrative Review and Clinical Decision-Making Considerations

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhinu J. Jayaseelan ◽  
John J. Mischke ◽  
Raymond L. Strazzulla
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Eccentric Exercise ◽  
Sports Medicine ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Health Condition ◽  
Achilles Tendinopathy ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Control Group

Background: Achilles tendinopathy is a common health condition encountered in the orthopedic and sports medicine settings. Eccentric exercise is a common intervention in the management of pain and limited function for this patient population, although contemporary evidence suggests additional exercise methods may be effective as well. Study design: Narrative review: Methods: A literature review was performed using the electronic databases Pubmed and PEDRO for articles through February 2019. Randomized clinical trials integrating eccentric exercise, with or without co-interventions, were evaluated. Outcomes related to pain and/or function were considered. A patient case is provided to highlight decision making processes related to clinical prescription of eccentrics for Achilles tendinopathy. Results: After screening titles and abstracts, seven studies were included for full review. Two articles compared eccentric exercise to a control group, four compared eccentrics to the use of modalities, while one used eccentric exercise as part of a multimodal intervention. In each case, eccentric exercise was effective in reducing pain and improving function. In comparison to other forms of exercise or additional interventions, eccentric exercise was frequently not more effective than other options. Discussion: Eccentric exercise has been associated with clinical benefit in improving pain and function for patients with Achilles tendinopathy. Despite the available evidence reporting effectiveness of eccentrics, other options may be equally useful. Appropriate load modification and exercise prescription for patients with Achilles tendinopathy requires systematic clinical reasoning and incorporation of patient values to optimize outcomes.

scholarly journals A Narrative Review and Proposed Framework for Using Health System Data with Systematic Reviews to Support Decision-making

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1830-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer S. Lin ◽  
M. Hassan Murad ◽  
Brian Leas ◽  
Jonathan R. Treadwell ◽  
Roger Chou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health System ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
System Data ◽  
Health System Data ◽  
Support Decision Making
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document