Consensus guidelines on plasma cell myeloma minimal residual disease analysis and reporting

2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Arroz ◽  
Neil Came ◽  
Pei Lin ◽  
Weina Chen ◽  
Constance Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Plasma Cell Myeloma ◽  
Consensus Guidelines ◽  
Disease Analysis ◽  
Minimal Residual

scholarly journals Marked Variability in Reported Minimal Residual Disease Lower Level of Detection of 4 Hematolymphoid Neoplasms: A Survey of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Flow Cytometry Proficiency Testing Program

2015 ◽  
Vol 139 (10) ◽  
pp. 1276-1280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Keeney ◽  
Jaimie G. Halley ◽  
Daniel D. Rhoads ◽  
M. Qasim Ansari ◽  
Steven J. Kussick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Plasma Cell Myeloma ◽  
Minimal Residual

Context Flow cytometry is often applied to minimal residual disease (MRD) testing in hematolymphoid neoplasia. Because flow-based MRD tests are developed in the laboratory, testing methodologies and lower levels of detection (LODs) are laboratory dependent. Objectives To broadly survey flow cytometry laboratories about MRD testing in laboratories, if performed, including indications and reported LODs. Design Voluntary supplemental questions were sent to the 549 laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) FL3-A Survey (Flow Cytometry—Immunophenotypic Characterization of Leukemia/Lymphoma) in the spring of 2014. Results A total of 500 laboratories (91%) responded to the supplemental questions as part of the FL3-A Survey by April 2014; of those 500 laboratories, 167 (33%) currently perform MRD for lymphoblastic leukemia, 118 (24%) for myeloid leukemia, 99 (20%) for chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and 91 (18%) for plasma cell myeloma. Other indications include non-Hodgkin lymphoma, hairy cell leukemia, neuroblastoma, and myelodysplastic syndrome. Most responding laboratories that perform MRD for lymphoblastic leukemia reported an LOD of 0.01%. For myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and plasma cell myeloma, most laboratories indicated an LOD of 0.1%. Less than 3% (15 of 500) of laboratories reported LODs of 0.001% for one or more MRD assays performed. Conclusions There is major heterogeneity in the reported LODs of MRD testing performed by laboratories subscribing to the CAP FL3-A Survey. To address that heterogeneity, changes to the Flow Cytometry Checklist for the CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program are suggested that will include new requirements that each laboratory (1) document how an MRD assay's LOD is measured, and (2) include the LOD or lower limit of enumeration for flow-based MRD assays in the final diagnostic report.

Evaluation of a 5-Color Flow Cytometric Technique for Immunophenotyping and Quantitation of Plasma Cell Myeloma in Post-Therapy Bone Marrows.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5036-5036
Author(s):  
Tove Isaacson ◽  
Andrzej Jakubowiak ◽  
Lloyd Stoolman ◽  
Usha Kota ◽  
William Finn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Plasma Cell Myeloma ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Flow Cytometric ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Multiparameter flow cytometry is a useful tool for comprehensive immunophenotyping of plasma cell myeloma, and has been proposed as a sensitive method for the evaluation of minimal residual disease in patients following treatment. This study aimed to assess the value of flow cytometry in quantitation of residual disease, in comparison to routine morphologic examination of first-pull bone marrow aspirate smears, in myeloma patients post-therapy. Heparinized bone marrow aspirates were obtained from 27 treated patients with plasma cell myeloma. Cells were prepared for 5-color flow cytometric analysis within 24-hours of specimen draw. Surface membrane staining with anti-CD19, CD20, CD38, CD45, CD56, and CD138 was followed by ammonium chloride lysis of red cells. Fixed and permeabilized cells were analyzed for cytoplasmic light chains to confirm clonality. Data were acquired using an FC500 flow cytometer (Beckman-Coulter), analyzed with CXP software with plasma cells isolated based on bright CD38+ or CD138+ expression. A median of 97,639 cellular events (range 14,279 to 262,508) were collected per analysis. Flow cytometric enumeration of plasma cells was compared to 500-cell differential counts of Wright-Giemsa-stained first-pull aspirate smears from the same cases. The median plasma cell count as determined by flow cytometry was 0.5% (range 0–7.9%). The median plasma cell count estimated by morphologic review was 8.0% (range 0–84.4%). Flow cytometry underestimated the plasma cell content in all but one case. Clonal plasma cells expressed CD38 and CD138 in all cases; 87.5% (21/24) coexpressed CD56, 25% (6/24) coexpressed CD45, and 4.2% (1/24) coexpressed CD19. None was positive for CD20. Although detection of minimal residual disease after therapy for acute leukemia is routinely achieved by flow cytometric analysis, successful quantitation of minimal residual disease in treated myeloma patients using flow cytometry remains limited as it usually underestimates the plasma cell content of bone marrow samples compared to routine morphology of first-pull aspirates. We have observed that this holds true for both pre-treatment and post-treatment specimens. Causes for the discrepancy may include hemodilution of second-pull aspirates used for flow cytometry, fragility and loss of plasma cells during preparation for flow cytometry, and incomplete disaggregation of plasma cells from bone marrow spicules. With improved outcome of treatments, better and more reliable methods of detection of minimal residual disease are needed for optimal prognostic stratification. We are currently validating alternative methods, which may offer more sensitivity while at the same time allow more objectivity, for assessing the amount of minimal residual disease in myeloma patients.

scholarly journals Participation in the College of American Pathologists Laboratory Accreditation Program Decreases Variability in B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Plasma Cell Myeloma Flow Cytometric Minimal Residual Disease Testing: A Follow-up Survey

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan M. Hupp ◽  
Christine Bashleben ◽  
Jolene L. Cardinali ◽  
David M. Dorfman ◽  
William Karlon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Proficiency Testing ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Laboratory Accreditation ◽  
Plasma Cell Myeloma ◽  
Accreditation Program ◽  
Minimal Residual

Context.— Minimal residual disease (MRD) testing by flow cytometry is ubiquitous in hematolymphoid neoplasm monitoring, especially B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), for which it provides predictive information and guides management. Major heterogeneity was identified in 2014. Subsequently, new Flow Cytometry Checklist items required documentation of the sensitivity determination method and required lower level of detection (LLOD) inclusion in final reports. This study assesses Laboratory Accreditation Program (LAP) participation and new Checklist items' impact on flow cytometry MRD testing. Objectives.— To survey flow cytometry laboratories about MRD testing for B-ALL and plasma cell myeloma. In particular, enumerate the laboratories performing MRD testing, the proportion performing assays with very low LLODs, and implementation of new Checklist items. Design.— Supplemental questions were distributed in the 2017-A mailing to 548 flow cytometry laboratories subscribed to the College of American Pathologists FL3 Proficiency Testing Survey (Flow Cytometry–Immunophenotypic Characterization of Leukemia/Lymphoma). Results.— The percentage of laboratories performing MRD studies has significantly decreased since 2014. Wide ranges of LLOD and collection event numbers were reported for B-ALL and plasma cell myeloma. Most laboratories determine LLOD by using dilutional studies and include it in final reports; a higher proportion of LAP participants used these practices than nonparticipants. Conclusions.— Several MRD testing aspects vary among laboratories receiving FL3 Proficiency Testing materials. After the survey in 2014, new Checklist items were implemented. As compared to 2014, fewer laboratories are performing MRD studies. While LLOD remains heterogeneous, a high proportion of LAP subscribers follow the new Checklist requirements and, overall, target LLOD recommendations from disease-specific working groups are met.

scholarly journals Standardized assay for assessment of minimal residual disease in blood, bone marrow and apheresis from patients with plasma cell myeloma

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Blum ◽  
Katy Haussmann ◽  
Mathias Streitz ◽  
Stephan Schlickeiser ◽  
Carola Tietze-Buerger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Plasma Cell Myeloma ◽  
Minimal Residual

Depth of response and minimal residual disease status in ultra high-risk multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukemia treated with daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (Dara-CVRd): Results of the UK optimum/MUKnine trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8001-8001
Author(s):  
Martin F. Kaiser ◽  
Andrew Hall ◽  
Katrina Walker ◽  
Ruth De Tute ◽  
Sadie Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Ultra High Risk ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Minimal Residual

8001 Background: Patients with ultra high-risk (UHiR) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) and patients with plasma cell leukemia (PCL) continue to have dismal outcomes and are underrepresented in clinical trials. Recently, improved responses with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody combination therapy have been reported for NDMM patients. We report here outcomes for NDMM UHiR and PCL patients treated in the OPTIMUM/MUKnine (NCT03188172) trial with daratumumab, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (Dara-CVRd) induction, augmented high-dose melphalan (HDMEL) and ASCT. With final analysis follow-up surpassed in Feb 2021, we report here early protocol defined endpoints from induction to day 100 post ASCT. Methods: Between Sep 2017 and Jul 2019, 107 patients with UHiR NDMM by central trial genetic (≥2 high risk lesions: t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain(1q), del(1p), del(17p)) or gene expression SKY92 (SkylineDx) profiling, or with PCL (circulating plasmablasts > 20%) were included in OPTIMUM across 39 UK hospitals. Patients received up to 6 cycles of Dara-CVRd induction, HDMEL and ASCT augmented with bortezomib, followed by Dara-VR(d) consolidation for 18 cycles and Dara-R maintenance. Primary trial endpoints are minimal residual disease (MRD) status post ASCT and progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include response, safety and quality of life. Data is complete but subject to further data cleaning prior to conference. Results: Median follow-up for the 107 patients in the safety population was 22.2 months (95% CI: 20.6 – 23.9). Two patients died during induction due to infection. Bone marrow aspirates suitable for MRD assessment by flow cytometry (10-5 sensitivity) were available for 81% of patients at end of induction and 78% at D100 post ASCT. Responses in the intention to treat population at end of induction were 94% ORR with 22% CR, 58% VGPR, 15% PR, 1% PD, 5% timepoint not reached (TNR; withdrew, became ineligible or died) and at D100 post ASCT 83% ORR with 47% CR, 32% VGPR, 5% PR, 7% PD, 10% TNR. MRD status was 41% MRDneg, 40% MRDpos and 19% not evaluable post induction and 64% MRDneg, 14% MRDpos and 22% not evaluable at D100 post ASCT. Responses at D100 post ASCT were lower in PCL with 22% CR, 22% VGPR, 22% PR, 22% PD, 12% TNR. Most frequent grade 3/4 AEs during induction were neutropenia (21%), thrombocytopenia (12%) and infection (12%). Grade 3 neuropathy rate was 3.7%. Conclusions: This is to our knowledge the first report on a trial for UHiR NDMM and PCL investigating Dara-CVRd induction and augmented ASCT. Response rates were high in this difficult-to-treat patient population, with toxicity comparable to other induction regimens. However, some early progressions highlight the need for innovative approaches to UHiR NDMM. Clinical trial information: NCT03188172.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document