scholarly journals Comparison of the effect of QMix and conventional root canal irrigants on push‐out bond strength of fiber post to root dentin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farzaneh Afkhami ◽  
Mona Sadegh ◽  
Aidin Sooratgar ◽  
Maryam Amirmoezi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Root Canal Irrigants ◽  
Root Dentin ◽  
Push Out

Effect of root canal irrigants on push-out bond strength of endodontic sealers: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Lara Dotto ◽  
Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira ◽  
Alvin Tomm ◽  
Ataís Bacchi ◽  
Rafael Sarkis-Onofre
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Root Canal Irrigants ◽  
Endodontic Sealers ◽  
Push Out

Effect of photodynamic therapy and ErCrYSGG laser irradiation on the push-out bond strength between fiber post and root dentin

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 415-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faisal Abdullah Alonaizan ◽  
Yasser F. AlFawaz ◽  
Abdulaziz Alsahhaf ◽  
Raneem S. Alofi ◽  
Khulud Abdulrahman Al-Aali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Root Dentin ◽  
Push Out

scholarly journals Effect of Glass Fiber Post Adaptation on Push-Out Bond Strength to Root Dentin

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 350-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thiago Lopes de Freitas ◽  
Rafael Pino Vitti ◽  
Milton Edson Miranda ◽  
William Cunha Brandt
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Adhesive Failure ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Glass Fiber Post ◽  
Push Out

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different glass fiber posts (GFPs) diameters on the push-out bond strength to dentin. Forty unirradicular human teeth were endodontically treated and used for cementation of GFPs (White Post DC, FGM) with different diameters (n=10): P1 - ø 1.6 mm coronal x 0.85 mm apical; P2 - ø 1.8 mm coronal x 1.05 mm apical; P5 - ø 1.4 mm coronal x 0.65 mm apical; and PC - customized post number 0.5 with composite resin (Tetric Ceram A2, Ivoclair Vivadent). All GFPs were cemented into the root canal using a dual-curing luting composite (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent). One slice (1.7 mm) of each root third of cemented GFP (cervical, middle, and apical) was submitted to push-out testing. Failure modes of all specimens were classified as: adhesive failure between resin cement and post; adhesive failure between dentin and resin cement; cohesive failure within resin cement, post or dentin; and mixed failure. The data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (a=0.05). The highest bond strength values were presented for the P2 and PC groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the GFP thirds in each group. The groups P2, P5, and PC showed predominantly adhesive failure. For P1, the most prevalent type of failure was adhesive between resin cement and post. It may be concluded that a glass fiber post that is well adapted to the root canal presents higher bond strength values, regardless of GFP third.

Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment Prior to Fiber Post Cementation on Long-Term Resin Cement Bond Strength

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. E72-E80 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Durski ◽  
M Metz ◽  
G Crim ◽  
S Hass ◽  
R Mazur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Single Root ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Push Out

SUMMARY The purpose of this study was to evaluate the push-out bond strength of two different adhesive cements (total etch and self-adhesive) for glass fiber post (GFP) cementation in simulated, long-term service (thermocycling) when the root canal is treated with chlorhexidine before cementation. One hundred twenty premolar specimens with a single root canal were selected, endodontically treated, and shaped for GFP cementation (n=120). The specimens were randomly placed into one of 12 groups (10 specimens each) according to cement (T = total-etch RelyX ARC or S = self-adhesive RelyX Unicem), treatment with chlorhexidine (N or Y: without or with), and number of thermal cycles (00, 20, or 40: 0, or 20,000 or 40,000 cycles): 1. TN00, 2. TN20, 3. TN40, 4. TY00, 5. TY20, 6. TY40, 7. SN00, 8. SN20, 9. SN40, 10. SY00, 11. SY20, 12. SY40. The root of each specimen was cut perpendicular to the vertical axis, yielding six 1.0 mm-thick sections. A push-out bond strength test was performed followed by statistical analysis using a factorial analysis of variance. Pairwise comparisons of significant factor interactions were adjusted using the Tukey test. Significant differences of push-out bond strengths were found in the four main effects (resin cement [p<0.0001], treatment with chlorhexidine [p<0.0001], number of cycles [p<0.0001], and root third [p<0.0001]) and all interactions (p<0.05 for all). Both resin cements produced higher bond strength in the cervical third followed by the middle third, and lower values were detected in the apical third. Additionally, the results suggest that the use of an additional disinfection treatment with chlorhexidine before the cement application produced the highest push-out bond strength regardless of root third. Further, the thermocycling simulation decreased the bond strength for both resin cements long-term when the chlorhexidine was not applied before cementation. However, when the root canal was treated with chlorhexidine and the fiber post was cemented with self-adhesive cement, the bond strength increased after 0, 20,000 and 40,000 cycles.

Effect of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin

2009 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. e74-e80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebru Özsezer Demiryürek ◽  
Şafak Külünk ◽  
Duygu Saraç ◽  
Gözde Yüksel ◽  
Bilinç Bulucu
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Root Canal Dentin ◽  
Push Out

Influence of laser irradiation on the push-out bond strength between a glass fiber post and root dentin

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karla G.F. Gomes ◽  
Natália S. Faria ◽  
Walter R. Neto ◽  
Vivian Colucci ◽  
Erica A. Gomes
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Glass Fiber Post ◽  
Root Dentin ◽  
Push Out

scholarly journals Adhesive Durability Inside the Root Canal Using Self-adhesive Resin Cements for Luting Fiber Posts

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. E167-E176 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Bitter ◽  
A Maletic ◽  
K Neumann ◽  
L Breschi ◽  
G Sterzenbach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Silver Deposits ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
One Year ◽  
Push Out

SUMMARY Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of various self-adhesive resin cements on the push-out bond strengths and nanoleakage expression at the luting interfaces of fiber posts immediately and after one year of aging. Methods and Materials: One hundred forty-four extracted human anterior teeth were endodontically treated. After post space preparation, fiber posts were luted using five commercially available self-adhesive resin (SAR) cements and a core build-up material applied with a self-etch adhesive (BF: Bifix SE/Rebilda Post, VOCO; CSA: Clearfil SA Cement/Rely X Fiber Post, 3M ESPE; RX: RelyX Unicem 2/Rely X Fiber Post, 3M ESPE; SPC: Speed Cem/FRC Postec, Ivoclar Vivadent; SMC: Smart Cem/X Post, Dentsply; RB: Rebilda DC-Futurabond/Rebilda Post; n=22). For each group, half of the specimens were subjected to thermocycling (TC) (5°C-55°C, 10,000 cycles) and stored humid for one year at 37°C. Push-out bond strength data of six slices (thickness 1 mm) per root and nanoleakage expression of representative specimens were evaluated after 24 hours (baseline) and after TC and storage for one year (aging), respectively. Results: Bond strength differed significantly among resin cements (p<0.0005) and the location inside the root canal (p<0.0005), but not by aging (p=0.390; repeated-measures analysis of variance). SMC (14.6±5.8 MPa) and RX (14.1±6.8 MPa) revealed significantly higher bond strength compared to BF (10.6±5.4 MPa) and RB (10.0±4.6 MPa) but differed not significantly from SPC (12.8±4.8) MPa; CSA (6.1±4.6 MPa) revealed significantly lower bond strength compared to all other investigated materials (p<0.05; Tukey Honestly Significantly Different). Qualitative nanoleakage analysis revealed more silver deposits at the interface in all groups after aging. For CSA, a large amount of silver deposits inside the cement was also observed at baseline and after aging. Conclusions: Fiber post luting using SAR cements demonstrated reliable bond strengths. Product-specific differences and initial degradation effects could be demonstrated.

scholarly journals Adhesion of real seal to human root dentin treated with different solutions

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 521-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Baldissera ◽  
Ricardo Abreu da Rosa ◽  
Márcia Helena Wagner ◽  
Milton Carlos Kuga ◽  
Fabiana Soares Grecca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
The Other ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Root Dentin ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Push Out

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different irrigants on sealer-dentin bond strength when using Real Seal. Thirty single-rooted teeth were divided into 3 groups. In one group, the teeth were irrigated with 3 mL of 2.5% NaOCl after each file change, flushed with 17% EDTA for 3 min and finally rinsed with 3 mL of 2.5% NaOCl. In the other two groups, rinse with NaOCl was replaced with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) and 0.9% saline, respectively. Each root was sectioned transversally into apical, middle and coronal thirds to obtain 2-mm-thick slices. Each slice was filled with Real Seal and Resilon. Push-out test was used to analyze bond strength and failure modes were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed, according to SEM observations. The push-out test did not reveal any statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between the irrigants. However, the groups exhibited significantly different (p<0.05) bond strengths in terms of the root canal third. Higher bond strength was observed at the apical third when compared with coronal third, while middle third presented intermediary values. Fifteen specimens were analyzed by SEM (5 per group). Eleven specimens exhibited adhesive failures (5 in saline, 4 in NaOCl and 2 in CHX group); 2 cohesive failures were observed in the CHX group, and 1 mixed failure each was observed in the CHX and NaOCl groups. The tested irrigants did not influence the bond strength of Resilon and Real Seal to dentin. The apical third exhibited higher mean bond strengths and adhesive failures were predominant.

scholarly journals Effect of Calcium Hypochlorite and Sodium Hypochlorite as Root Canal Irrigants on Push-Out Bond Strength of Fiber Post Cemented with Etch-and-Rinse Resin Cement: An In Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdiyeh Sheikh Ghahderijani ◽  
Maryam Khoroushi ◽  
Atiyeh Feiz
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Calcium Hypochlorite ◽  
Root Canal Irrigants ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Push Out ◽  
Group 1

Objectives: Calcium hypochlorite (CH) has been recently used as a root canal irrigant. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of CH and sodium hypochlorite (SH), as root canal irrigants, on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts cemented with an etch-and-rinse resin cement.  Materials and Methods: In this experimental in-vitro study, 40 human anterior teeth with similar root lengths were randomly divided into five groups (N=8) according to the protocol of root canal irrigation as follows: group 1: saline (control); group 2: 2.5% SH; group 3: 5.25% SH; group 4: 2.5% CH; group 5: 5% CH. Before post placement, the post space was irrigated using the same irrigation protocol, and after that, they were irrigated by distilled water. Fiber posts were cemented with All-Bond 3 bonding and Dou-Link Universal cement. After thermocycling (1000 cycles, 5- 55°C), a push-out test was performed, and data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc test with SPSS version 23 (α=0.05). Results: The highest and lowest mean bond strengths were detected in groups 2 and 5, respectively. There was no significant difference between group 1 and the SH groups (P>0.05), but the difference between group 1 and the CH groups was significant (P<0.001). There was a significant difference between SH groups and CH groups (P<0.001). Conclusion: Compared to SH, as a root canal irrigant, CH decreased the push-out bond strength of fiber posts cemented with an etch-and-rinse resin cement.  

Effect of exposure to root canal irrigants on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate–based cements

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Rebolloso de Barrio ◽  
Lucía Gancedo-Caravia ◽  
Ernesto García-Barbero ◽  
Juan José Pérez-Higueras
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Root Canal Irrigants ◽  
Push Out
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document