scholarly journals Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 566-579
Author(s):  
Mohammed A. AlSarhan ◽  
Reham Al Jasser ◽  
Mohammad Abdullah Tarish ◽  
Anas I. AlHuzaimi ◽  
Hamad Alzoman
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Collagen Matrix ◽  
Matrix Versus ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Tissue Graft

scholarly journals The effect of partially exposed connective tissue graft on root-coverage outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin Dodge ◽  
Jeffrey Garcia ◽  
Paul Luepke ◽  
Yu-Lin Lai ◽  
Moawia Kassab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Tissue Graft

scholarly journals Collagen Matrix vs. Autogenous Connective Tissue Graft for Soft Tissue Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 1810
Author(s):  
Cristina Vallecillo ◽  
Manuel Toledano-Osorio ◽  
Marta Vallecillo-Rivas ◽  
Manuel Toledano ◽  
Alberto Rodriguez-Archilla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Soft Tissue Augmentation ◽  
Total Width ◽  
Collagen Matrices ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Tissue Graft

Soft tissues have been shown to be critical for the maintenance of both teeth and implants. Currently, regenerative soft tissue techniques propose the use of collagen matrices, which can avoid the drawbacks derived from the obtainment of autogenous tissue graft. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to ascertain the efficacy of collagen matrices (CM) compared to autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG) to improve soft tissue dimensions. An electronic and manual literature searches were performed to identify randomized clinical trials (RCT) or controlled clinical trials (CCT) that compared CTG and CM. Pooled data of width of keratinized tissue (KT) and mucosal thickness (MT) were collected and weighted means were calculated. Heterogeneity was determined using Higgins (I2). If I2 > 50% a random-effects model was applied. Nineteen studies were included based on the eligibility criteria. When using CTG a higher MT gain (0.32 mm, ranging from 0.49 to 0.16 mm) was obtained than when employing CM. Similar result was obtained for the width of KT gain, that was 0.46 mm higher (ranging from 0.89 to 0.02 mm) when employing CTG. However, it can be stated that, although autogenous CTG achieves higher values, CM are an effective alternative in terms of total width of KT and MT gain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document