scholarly journals Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) versus patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)-Is there a difference?

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 61-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asbjørn Jokstad
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Development and Validation of a Novel Knee-Specific Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
James L. Farnsworth ◽  
Todd Evans ◽  
Helen Binkley ◽  
Minsoo Kang
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Partial Credit Model ◽  
Partial Credit ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Full Study

Context: Previous research suggests that several knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures have poor measurement properties. The patient-reported outcomes knee assessment tool (PROKAT) was created to improve assessment of knee-specific function. Examination of the measurement properties of this new measure is critical to determine its clinical value. Objective: Examine the measurement properties of the PROKAT. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Clinical athletic training setting. Patients or Other Participants: The pilot study included 32 student-athletes (mean age = 20.78 [1.01], males = 56.30%). The full study included 203 student-athletes (mean age = 21.46 [4.64], males = 54.70%) from 3 separate institutions. The participants were recruited for both the pilot and full study using face-to-face and electronic (eg, email and social media sites) communications. Intervention(s): Evaluation of the measurement properties of the PROKAT occurred using the Rasch partial-credit model. Main Outcome Measures: Infit and outfit statistics, item step difficulties, person ability parameters, category function, item and test information functions, and Cronbach alpha. An independent samples t test was used to evaluate the differences in injured and noninjured athletes’ scores. Results: The Rasch partial-credit model analysis of pilot test items and qualitative participant feedback were used to modify the initial PROKAT. Evaluation of the revised PROKAT (32 items) indicated 27 items had acceptable model–data fit. The injured athletes scored significantly worse than the noninjured athletes (t188 = 12.89; P < .01). The ceiling effects for the PROKAT were minimal (3.9%). Conclusions: A major advantage of this study was the use of the Rasch measurement and the targeted population. Compared with alternative knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures (eg, Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form), the PROKAT has low ceiling effects in athletic populations. In addition, evidence suggests the measure may be capable of distinguishing between injured and noninjured athletes.

scholarly journals Outcome evaluation by patient reported outcome measures in stroke clinical practice (EPOS) protocol for a prospective observation and implementation study

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Leander Rimmele ◽  
Lisa Lebherz ◽  
Marc Frese ◽  
Hannes Appelbohm ◽  
Hans-Jürgen Bartz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Everyday Life ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Outcome Evaluation ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Stroke Center

Abstract Introduction The impact of stroke-related impairment on activities of daily living may vary between patients, and can only be estimated by applying patient-reported outcome measures. The International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement has developed a standard set of instruments that combine clinical and longitudinal patient-reported outcome measures for stroke. The present study was designed (1) to implement and evaluate the feasibility of the use of it as a consistent outcome measure in clinical routine at the stroke center of a German university hospital, (2) to characterize impairment in everyday life caused by stroke, and (3) to identify predictive factors associated with patient-relevant outcomes. Methods We plan to enroll 1040 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or intracerebral hemorrhage in a prospective observational study. Demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and living situation are assessed at inpatient surveillance. At 90 days and 12 months after inclusion, follow-up assessments take place including the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10-Question Short Form (PROMIS-10), the Patient- Health Questionnaire-4, and the simplified modified Ranking Scale questionnaire. The acceptance and feasibility (1) will be assessed by a process evaluation through qualitative semi-structured interviews with clinical staff and patients and quantitative analyses of the data quality evaluating practicability, acceptance, adoption, and fidelity to protocol. The primary outcome of objective 2 and 3 is health-related quality of life measured with the PROMIS-10. Additional outcomes are depressive and anxiety symptoms and patient participation in their social roles. Patient-reported outcomes will be assessed in their longitudinal course using (generalized) mixed regressions. Exploratory descriptive and inference statistical analyses will be used to find patterns of patient characteristics and predictive factors of the outcome domains. Perspective The results will describe and further establish the evaluation of stroke patients of a stroke center by standardized PROMs in everyday life. Trial registration The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03795948). Approval of the local ethics committee (Ethik-Kommission der Ärztekammer Hamburg) has been obtained.

scholarly journals What are patient-reported outcomes and why they are important: improving studies of preschool wheeze

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi Makrinioti ◽  
Andrew Bush ◽  
Chris Griffiths
Keyword(s):  
Child Health ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Common Condition ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
User Friendly

There are no outcomes-based commissioning structures in child health. This needs to change. Preschool wheeze is a very common condition. Many families present at emergency departments with their wheezy children and stay briefly. This highlights that this group of children may be lacking a more personalised approach. There are no user-friendly patient-reported outcome measures in preschool wheeze. This needs to change. Research in this area is therefore highly anticipated.

Impact of Postoperative Opioid Use on 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes in Knee Surgery Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuyang Song ◽  
Patrick M.J. Sajak ◽  
Ali Aneizi ◽  
Aymen Alqazzaz ◽  
Cameran I. Burt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Knee Surgery ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Medical Comorbidities ◽  
Patient Reported

AbstractThe purposes of this study were to identify the patient characteristics associated with refilling a postoperative opioid prescription after knee surgery and to determine whether refilling opioids is associated with 2-year patient-reported outcomes. We hypothesized that postoperative refill of opioids would be associated with worse 2-year patient-reported outcomes. We studied 192 patients undergoing knee surgery at a single urban academic institution. Patients completed multiple patient-reported outcome measures preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively, including six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, numeric pain scale scores for the operative knee and the rest of the body, Marx Activity Rating Scale, as well as measures of met expectations, improvement, and satisfaction. Total morphine equivalents (TMEs) were calculated from a regional prescription monitoring program. Patients who refilled a postoperative opioid prescription were compared with those who did not, and TMEs were calculated for those who refilled (Refill TMEs). One hundred twenty-nine patients (67%) refilled at least one postoperative opioid prescription. Black race, older age, higher average body mass index (BMI), smoking, greater medical comorbidities, preoperative opioid use, lower income, government insurance, and knee arthroplasty were associated with refilling opioids. Greater Refill TMEs was associated with black or white race, older age, higher average BMI, smoking, greater medical comorbidities, preoperative opioid use, government insurance, and unemployment. Refilling opioids and greater Refill TMEs were associated with worse postoperative scores on most patient-reported outcome measures 2 years after knee surgery. However, refilling opioids and greater Refill TMEs did not have a significant association with improvement after surgery. Multivariable analysis controlling for potential confounding variables confirmed that greater postoperative Refill TMEs independently predicted worse 2-year PROMIS Physical Function, 2-year PROMIS Pain Interference, and 2-year IKDC knee function scores. Postoperative refill of opioids was associated with worse 2-year patient-reported outcomes in a dose-dependent fashion. These findings reinforce the importance of counseling patients regarding opioid use and optimizing opioid-sparing pain management postoperatively.

scholarly journals Article Commentary: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. HSI.S11093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Weldring ◽  
Sheree M.S. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Health Care Service ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported

In recent years, there has been an increased focus on placing patients at the center of health care research and evaluating clinical care in order to improve their experience and ensure that research is both robust and of maximum value for the use of medicinal products, therapy, or health services. This paper provides an overview of patients’ involvement in clinical research and service evaluation along with its benefits and limitations. We describe and discuss patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the trends in current research. Both the patient-reported experiences measures (PREMs) and patient and public involvement (PPI) initiative for including patients in the research processes are also outlined. PROs provide reports from patients about their own health, quality of life, or functional status associated with the health care or treatment they have received. PROMs are tools and/or instruments used to report PROs. Patient report experiences through the use of PREMs, such as satisfaction scales, providing insight into the patients’ experience with their care or a health service. There is increasing international attention regarding the use of PREMS as a quality indicator of patient care and safety. This reflects the ongoing health service commitment of involving patients and the public within the wider context of the development and evaluation of health care service delivery and quality improvement.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Resource for Recreational Therapists

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan McCormick ◽  
David Austin
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Recreational Therapy ◽  
Client Care ◽  
Patient Reported

To our knowledge, information on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has not appeared in the literature of recreational therapy. This article provides an introduction to PROs and PROMs so recreational therapists may understand them and see their possible applications within recreational therapy. In this article, PROs and PROMs are described. Specific examples of PROMs, and resources for accessing them are provided. Discussion on the value of PROs in the enhancement of client care, challenges to the use of PROMs, and the relevance of PROMS to recreational therapy practice and research follows. It is concluded that the use of PROMs is an emerging approach that recreational therapists need to explore.

scholarly journals Characteristics and Patient-reported Outcomes Associated to Dropout in Severely Affected Oncological Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pimrapat Gebert ◽  
Daniel Schindel ◽  
Johann Frick ◽  
Liane Schenk ◽  
Ulrike Grittner
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Social Support ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract BackgroundPatient-reported outcome measures are commonly used and are surrogates for clinical outcomes in cancer research. In the research setting of very severe diseases such as cancer, it is difficult to avoid the problem of incomplete questionnaires from drop-out or missing data due to patients who deceased during observation period. We aimed to explore patient characteristics and patient-reported outcomes associated with the time-to-dropout. MethodsIn the Oncological Social Care Project (OSCAR) study the condition of participants was assessed four times within 12 months (t0: baseline, t1: 3 months, t2: 6 months, t3:12 months) by validated patient-reported outcome measures. We performed competing-risks regression based on Fine and Gray’s proportional sub-distribution hazards model for exploring factors associated with time-to-dropout. Death was considered a competing risk. ResultsThree hundred sixty-two participants were analyzed in the study. 193 (53.3%) completed follow-up at 12 months, 67 (18.5%) patients dropped out, and 102 patients (28.2%) died during the study period. Poor subjective social support was related to higher risk for drop-out (SHR=2.10; 95%CI: 1.01 – 4.35). Lower values in quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) were related to drop-out and death. The subscales global health status/QoL, role functioning, physical functioning, and fatigue symptom were key characteristics associated with drop-out.ConclusionSeverely affected cancer patients with poor social support and poor quality of life seem more likely to drop out of studies compared to patients with higher levels of social support and quality of life. This should be considered when planning studies assessing cancer patients. Methods to monitor drop-outs timely and handle missing outcomes might be used. Results of such studies have to be interpreted with caution in light of the particular drop-out mechanisms.

Relationship between preoperative patient-reported outcomes and hospital length of stay: a prospective cohort study of general surgery patients in Vancouver, Canada

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Sutherland ◽  
Guiping Liu ◽  
Trafford Crump ◽  
Matthew Bair ◽  
Ahmer Karimuddin
Keyword(s):  
Health Status ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Preoperative Patient

Objectives As an aging population drives more demand for elective inpatient surgery, one approach to reducing length of stay is enhanced evaluation of patients’ preoperative health status. The objective of this research was to determine whether patient-reported outcome measures collected preoperatively can identify patients at risk for longer lengths of stay. Methods This study was based on a prospectively recruited cohort of patients who were scheduled for elective inpatient general surgery in Vancouver, Canada. All participants completed a number of patient-reported outcome measures preoperatively, including the EQ-5D for general health status, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for depression, and the pain intensity (P), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and interference with general activity (G), known as the PEG, for pain. Patient-reported outcome data were linked to hospital discharge summaries. Multivariate regression was performed to estimate risk of longer lengths of stay, adjusting for patient and clinical characteristics. The primary outcome was length of stay and its associated cost. Data collection took place between October 2012 and November 2016. Results Participation among the population of 2307 eligible patients was 50.5%, providing 1165 participants. Preoperative patient-reported outcomes were not concordant with hospital reported diagnoses of depression or pain. Patients’ preoperative depression and pain scores were independently positively associated with longer length of stay after adjusting for patient-level characteristics. Patients whose PHQ-9 score was 10, representing clinically significant depression, were estimated to have a 1.53 day longer hospitalization, which was associated with an estimated incremental hospital cost of $1667. Conclusions Preoperative self-reported assessment of depression and pain can assist with identifying patients at higher risk of longer lengths of stay. Patient’s self-reported preoperative measures of depression and pain should be incorporated into patient pathways. They provide opportunities for improving management of general surgery patients and possibly play a role in aligning hospital funding with patients’ needs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document