Outcome assessment for children and adolescents: psychometric validation of the Youth Outcome Questionnaire 30.1 (Y-OQ®-30.1)

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 388-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd W. Dunn ◽  
Gary M. Burlingame ◽  
Michael Walbridge ◽  
Jared Smith ◽  
Molly J. Crum
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Outcome Assessment ◽  
Psychometric Validation ◽  
Outcome Questionnaire ◽  
Youth Outcome Questionnaire

Tracking the influence of mental health treatment: the development of the Youth Outcome Questionnaire

2001 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 361-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary M. Burlingame ◽  
Julie I. Mosier ◽  
M. Gawain Wells ◽  
Quincey G. Atkin ◽  
Michael J. Lambert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Treatment ◽  
Outcome Questionnaire ◽  
Youth Outcome Questionnaire ◽  
Health Treatment

Patient-Rated Outcome Assessment With the German Version of the Outcome Questionnaire 45 in People With Severe Mental Illness

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Puschner ◽  
Suzanne Cosh ◽  
Thomas Becker
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Severe Mental Illness ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Outcome Assessment ◽  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Outcome Questionnaire ◽  
German Version ◽  
Sensitivity To Change ◽  
Wide Range

Abstract. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and psychometric properties of the German version of the Outcome Questionnaire (Ergebnisfragebogen; EB-45) in people with severe mental illness (N = 294). Reliability and sensitivity to change were assessed. Convergent validity was examined through correlations with the measures Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS-D) and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), and predictive validity through correlation with length of inpatient stay. The EB-45 showed good reliability and sensitivity to change, as well as good internal consistency for the total score and the subscale “symptom distress.” The EB-45 was found to be acceptable and feasible for use within inpatient psychiatric settings. Also predictive validity was good. However, psychometric properties of the subscales “interpersonal relations” and “social role” were equivocal. Thus, interpreting subscale scores only is not advisable. Also low convergent validity is a concern. Taken together, the EB-45 can be recommended for outcome assessment in a wide range of mental health service settings including inpatient psychiatric services. However, treatment planning and evaluation of effectiveness of services for people with severe mental illness should not be based on EB-45 data alone.

scholarly journals Assessing fatigue in children and adolescents: Psychometric validation of the German version of the PROMIS® Pediatric Short Form v2.0 - Fatigue 10a in school children and pediatric chronic pain patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariane Sommer ◽  
Susanne Grothus ◽  
Kamila Grochowska ◽  
Benedikt B. Claus ◽  
Lorin Stahlschmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
School Children ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Psychometric Validation ◽  
German Version ◽  
Pediatric Chronic Pain ◽  
Chronic Pain Patients ◽  
Pain Patients

Abstract Purpose Fatigue is a common symptom in children and adolescents. Its negative impact on health outcomes is even more pronounced in those with chronic pain. There is currently no fatigue measurement tool in German that is validated for both children and adolescents with and without chronic pain. Therefore, this study aimed to gather quantitative validity evidence to support the use of the German version of the PROMIS® Pediatric Short Form v2.0 - Fatigue 10a (PROMIS® F-SF) in the German pediatric general population as well as in German pediatric chronic pain patients. Methods The 10-item self-assessment questionnaire was validated in a sample of N = 1348 school children (9–18 years; 52.4% female) and N = 114 pediatric chronic pain patients (8–17 years; 63.3% female). Construct and convergent validity, reliability, and item and scale characteristics were examined. Results Confirmatory factor analyses showed sufficient model fit for the 1-factor model of the questionnaire (school sample: CFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.10, SRMR = 0.04; patient sample: CFI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.14, SRMR = 0.05). Convergent validity was supported by weak-to-large significant correlations with sleep quality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and pain characteristics. The questionnaire had excellent internal consistency in both samples (α = 0.92 and α = 0.93). Sex differences and age distributions of the PROMIS® F-SF showed that girls reported significantly higher fatigue than boys and that fatigue increased with age. Conclusion The PROMIS® F-SF is a reliable instrument with good psychometric properties. Preliminary evidence is provided that the questionnaire validly measures fatigue in children and adolescents with and without chronic pain.

Youth Outcome Questionnaire--12

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony C. Tzoumas ◽  
Jennifer L. Tzoumas ◽  
Gary M. Burlingame ◽  
Philip L. Nelson ◽  
M. Gawain Wells ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Questionnaire ◽  
Youth Outcome Questionnaire

Reliability and validity of the youth outcome questionnaire self-report

2009 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. 1115-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathanael W. Ridge ◽  
Jared S. Warren ◽  
Gary M. Burlingame ◽  
M. Gawain Wells ◽  
Katherine M. Tumblin
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Outcome Questionnaire ◽  
Youth Outcome Questionnaire

Psychometric validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome questionnaire in patients with Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency

Pancreatology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. S19-S20
Author(s):  
Colin Johnson ◽  
Nicola Williamson ◽  
Gwendolyn Janssen-van Solingen ◽  
Rob Arbuckle ◽  
Chloe Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Psychometric Validation ◽  
Outcome Questionnaire ◽  
Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency ◽  
Exocrine Insufficiency ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Pancreatic Exocrine

Psychometric Validation of the Preschool Outcome Questionnaire: A Preschool Treatment Outcome Instrument

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 504-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Barker ◽  
Thad Q. Lloyd ◽  
Peter K. Stewart ◽  
M. Gawain Wells
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Psychometric Validation ◽  
Outcome Questionnaire ◽  
Outcome Instrument
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document