scholarly journals Why are some cases not on track? An item analysis of the Assessment for Signal Cases during inpatient psychotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-566
Author(s):  
Thomas Probst ◽  
Maria Kleinstäuber ◽  
Michael J. Lambert ◽  
Karin Tritt ◽  
Christoph Pieh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Item Analysis ◽  
Inpatient Psychotherapy

A flexible test grading and item analysis system

1974 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 691-696
Author(s):  
GL Olde ◽  
CP Cole ◽  
JW Wittrock
Keyword(s):  
Item Analysis ◽  
Analysis System

Item analysis of the ‘My Use of Interpersonal Skills Inventory’

1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Sirin ◽  
Eric Hall ◽  
Carol Hall ◽  
Jane Restorick
Keyword(s):  
Interpersonal Skills ◽  
Item Analysis

Assessing Stressors Related to Migration in Patients With Psychiatric Disorders

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 262-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Johannes Müller ◽  
Suzan Kamcili-Kubach ◽  
Songül Strassheim ◽  
Eckhardt Koch
Keyword(s):  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Item Analysis ◽  
Global Assessment Of Functioning ◽  
Family Conflicts ◽  
Response Options ◽  
Reliability Indices ◽  
Dsm Iv ◽  
Functional Relevance ◽  
Sum Scores ◽  
Gaf Scores

A 10-item instrument for the assessment of probable migration-related stressors was developed based on previous work (MIGSTR10) and interrater reliability was tested in a chart review study. The MIGSTR10 and nine nonspecific stressors of the DSM-IV Axis IV (DSMSTR9) were put into a questionnaire format with categorical and dimensional response options. Charts of 100 inpatients (50 Turkish migrants [MIG], 50 native German patients [CON]) with affective or anxiety disorder were reviewed by three independent raters and MIGSTR10, DSMSTR9, and Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF) scores were obtained. Interrater reliability indices (ICC) of items and sum scores were calculated. The prevalence of single migration-related stressors in MIG ranged from 15% to 100% (CON 0–92%). All items of the MIGSTR10 (ICC 0.58–0.92) and the DSMSTR9 (ICC 0.56–0.96) reached high to very high interrater agreement (p < .0005). The item analysis of the MIGSTR10 revealed sufficient internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.68/0.69) and only one item (“family conflicts”) without substantial correlation with the remaining scale. Correlation analyses showed a significant overlap of dimensional MIGSTR10 scores (r² = 0.25; p < .01) and DSMSTR9 scores (r² = 9%; p < .05) with GAF scores in MIG indicating functional relevance. MIGSTR10 is considered a feasible, economic, and reliable instrument for the assessment of stressors potentially related to migration.

Three Conceptual Impediments to Developing Scale Theory for Formative Scales

Methodology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 156-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith A. Markus
Keyword(s):  
Scale Development ◽  
Item Analysis ◽  
Model Fitting ◽  
Item Bias ◽  
Validity Evidence ◽  
Scale Theory ◽  
Underlying Theory ◽  
Standard Scale ◽  
Item Scores

Abstract. Bollen and colleagues have advocated the use of formative scales despite the fact that formative scales lack an adequate underlying theory to guide development or validation such as that which underlies reflective scales. Three conceptual impediments impede the development of such theory: the redefinition of measurement restricted to the context of model fitting, the inscrutable notion of conceptual unity, and a systematic conflation of item scores with attributes. Setting aside these impediments opens the door to progress in developing the needed theory to support formative scale use. A broader perspective facilitates consideration of standard scale development concerns as applied to formative scales including scale development, item analysis, reliability, and item bias. While formative scales require a different pattern of emphasis, all five of the traditional sources of validity evidence apply to formative scales. Responsible use of formative scales requires greater attention to developing the requisite underlying theory.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document