scholarly journals Use of the 22C3 anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody to determine programmed death-ligand 1 expression in cytology samples obtained from non-small cell lung cancer patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marius Ilie ◽  
Jonathan Juco ◽  
Lingkang Huang ◽  
Veronique Hofman ◽  
Shirin Khambata-Ford ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 13299-13305
Author(s):  
Jean-Bernard Auliac ◽  
Florian Guisier ◽  
Acya Bizieux ◽  
Pascal Assouline ◽  
Marie Bernardini ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. e20200584
Author(s):  
Juliana Guarize1 ◽  
Elena Guerini Rocco2 ◽  
Filippo de Marinis3 ◽  
Giulia Sedda4 ◽  
Luca Bertolaccini4 ◽  
...  

Objective: EBUS-TBNA cytological sampling is routinely performed for pathological diagnosis, mediastinal staging, and molecular testing in lung cancer patients. EBUS-TBNA samples are not formally accepted for testing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. The objective of the study was to compare the feasibility, reproducibility, and accuracy of PD-L1 expression assessment in cytological specimens and histological samples. Methods: We prospectively collected histological (transbronchial forceps biopsy) and cytological (EBUS-TBNA) samples from peribronchial neoplastic lesions during an endoscopic procedure at the same target lesion for the pathological diagnosis and molecular assessment of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results: Fifteen patients underwent the procedure. Adequate cytological samples (at least 100 neoplastic cells) were obtained in 12 cases (92.3%). Assessment of PD-L1 expression was similar between histological and cytological samples (agreement rate = 92%). Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA cytological specimens were 88.9% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: The evaluation of PD-L1 expression in EBUS-TBNA cytological specimens is feasible and presents good reproducibility when compared with routine histological samples. EBUS-TBNA cytological samples could be used for the assessment of PD-L1 expression in patients with NSCLC as a minimally invasive approach in stage IV NSCLC cancer patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (03) ◽  
pp. 400-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joy Huang ◽  
Karen L. Reckamp

AbstractTraditionally, lung cancer has been treated as an immune-resistant disease with platinum-based chemotherapy serving as the first-line treatment for metastatic disease. The efficacy of immunotherapy has been established for patients with advanced lung cancer in clinical trials, and it has since become the standard of care for patients without targetable mutations, with or without chemotherapy. Previously, lung cancer patients experienced limited responses to immune-based therapy. As clinical trials continued to explore immunotherapy options with checkpoint inhibitors, results showed that immune therapies can create durable responses with manageable toxicities. Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can experience improved survival when administered immunotherapy over chemotherapy. The first successful immunotherapy treatments developed exploit programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), immune checkpoint pathways. Combination therapies of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy or PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 checkpoint pathway inhibitors have also demonstrated improved outcomes for patients with NSCLC. Combination therapy with PD-1 or PD-L1 therapy and chemotherapy has shown benefit for small cell lung cancer patients as well. As immunotherapy changes the treatment paradigm of lung cancer, researchers continue to investigate different combinations, timing, duration, and biomarkers to better understand and improve the efficacy of immune-based therapy for patients with lung cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document