scholarly journals The role of liquid-based cytology and ancillary techniques in pleural and pericardic effusions: An institutional experience

2015 ◽  
Vol 123 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Diana Rossi ◽  
Tommaso Bizzarro ◽  
Fernando Schmitt ◽  
Adhemar Longatto-Filho
PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e0168625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Rossi ◽  
Tommaso Bizzarro ◽  
Maurizio Martini ◽  
Adhemar Longatto-Filho ◽  
Fernando Schmitt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Satoshi Morito ◽  
Takao Nitanda ◽  
Ryuko Tsukamoto ◽  
Shingo Kamoshida ◽  
Hiroshi Yasui ◽  
...  

Immunocytochemistry (ICC) is an important ancillary technique in clinical cytology for not only identifying and characterizing tumor cells but also gaining prognostic or therapeutic information. Although cell blocks are often prepared for immunocytochemical evaluation of body cavity fluid and fine-needle aspiration specimens, they are not suitable for hypocellular samples. Liquid-based cytology can help prepare additional smears from residual cytological specimens. However, since conventional methods are used for nongynecological specimens in most laboratories, ICC is often limited by the number of cytological smears. Cell transfer methods permit to evaluate several immunocytochemical markers in a single cytological smear. Yet, these methods have some limitations; for example, they are time-consuming (about 3–40 h) and medium membranes with their attached cells are occasionally stretched or torn when peeled off the slides. Therefore, in an attempt to solve these problems, we developed a rapid and reliable cell transfer method using a nylon mesh. Our method requires no special equipment or reagent and can significantly reduce the turnaround time, as compared to previous methods.


2021 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. S268
Author(s):  
Ranjani Padmanabhan ◽  
Tugce Kutuk ◽  
Kamran Ahmed ◽  
Daniel Fernandez ◽  
Michael Montejo

Cytopathology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Papaefthimiou ◽  
H. Symiakaki ◽  
P. Mentzelopoulou ◽  
A. E. Giahnaki ◽  
Z. Voulgaris ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 129 (12) ◽  
pp. 1459-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Jia Wen ◽  
Pi-Li Xu ◽  
Rui Chen ◽  
Xi Yang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 325-330
Author(s):  
Banushree Chandrasekhar Srinivasamurthy ◽  
Sabita Pulavarthi ◽  
Ramachandra.V. Bhat ◽  
Dharanya Mathiyazhagan

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiaki Norimatsu ◽  
Kenji Yanoh ◽  
Yasuo Hirai ◽  
Tetsuji Kurokawa ◽  
Tadao K. Kobayashi ◽  
...  

The adoption of endometrial cytology as a diagnostic procedure has been hampered in the past by difficulties arising in interpreting the cellular findings due to a number of factors (such as excess blood, cellular overlapping, and the complex physiology of endometrium). Recently, the use of liquid-based cytology (LBC), with its ability to remove blood and mucus and to distribute cells uniformly in a thin layer on the slide, has provided an opportunity to reevaluate the role of endometrial cytology. LBC samples are easier to screen compared to conventional ones, due to a smaller screening area and an excellent quality of cell preparations. LBC by using peculiar cytoarchitectural features is a useful tool in the cellular diagnosis and follow-up of abnormalities, which, however, remains complementary to histopathology and to the emerging molecular diagnostic cytopathology. This review discusses these various entities and takes into consideration the ancillary techniques that may be useful in the diagnostic procedure. Herein, we also summarize the process and rationale by which updates were made to the standardized terminology in 2018 and outline the contents of the new Bethesda-style classification (the Yokohama system) for the endometrial cytology.


2020 ◽  
pp. 030089162096021
Author(s):  
Chao Cao ◽  
Xuechan Yu ◽  
Tingting Zhu ◽  
Qingwen Jiang ◽  
Yiting Li ◽  
...  

Background: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) tests, including the liquid-based thin layer method, have demonstrated the highest potential for reducing false-negatives and improving sample quality. Method: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic role of LBC of bronchial brushing specimens in lung cancer. A total of 249 patients were analyzed in our study, involving 155 patients with combined bronchial brushing and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and 94 patients with BAL alone. Results: The sensitivity in the combined bronchial brushing and BAL group was 61.4% in the diagnosis of lung cancer, which is much higher than with BAL alone. Rates of positive predictive values and negative predictive values in the combined group compared with the BALF alone group were 98.6% vs 100% and 47.6% vs 37.4%, respectively. Sensitivity in the BALF alone group was 12.5% in bronchoscopically invisible pulmonary lesions and as high as 52.1% in the combined group. Conclusion: The results from our study demonstrated that LBC of brushing samples could be used as an important complement of bronchoscopy and could have the potential to be widely applied.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document