scholarly journals Evaluating cancer patient–reported outcome measures: Readability and implications for clinical use

Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 125 (8) ◽  
pp. 1350-1356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet K. Papadakos ◽  
Rebecca C. Charow ◽  
Christine J. Papadakos ◽  
Lesley J. Moody ◽  
Meredith E. Giuliani
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patient ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Systematic review and standardised assessment of Chinese cross-cultural adapted hip Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0257081
Author(s):  
James Reeves Mbori Ngwayi ◽  
Jie Tan ◽  
Ning Liang ◽  
Emmanuel Gildas Eric Sita ◽  
Kenedy Uzoma Obie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Outcome Score ◽  
Culturally Adapted ◽  
Patient Reported

Purpose To perform a systemic literature search to identify Chinese cross culturally adapted and new designed Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) used for hip assessment, then a standardized evaluation of available instruments in order to provide evidence of high-quality PROMs for clinical use and adoption in future hip registries. Methods A Systematic Review of the following databases: PUBMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, CNKI was performed to identify relevant PROMs. Instruments underwent standardized assessment and scoring using the EMPRO tool by two independent reviewers. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Results 2188 articles were retrieved, with seven articles fitting the inclusion criteria consisting of six hip PROMs. Five PROMs were cross culturally adapted and one was originally designed in Mandarin Chinese. Total scores (/100) after EMPRO evaluation: Osteoarthritis of Knee and Hip Quality of Life (OAKHQOL): 55; Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): 52; International Hip Outcome Tool (SC-iHOT-33): 45; Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS): 37; Questionnaire on the Perceptions and Functions of Patients about Total Hip Arthroplasty (QPFPTHA): 36; Oxford Hip Score (OHS): 35. ICC values were 0.73 for the SC-iHOT-33 and ranged between 0.83–0.93 for the other PROMs indicating good to excellent inter-rater agreement. Conclusion Among the commonly used hip-specific PROMs found in arthroplasty registries, none of the Chinese adapted versions evaluated by EMPRO is currently rated acceptable for clinical use. Only OAKHQOL and HAGOS reached acceptability threshold. Further research on the attributes of cross-cultural adaptation, interpretability and burden assessment would be helpful.

Impact of Depression on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Lumbar Spine Decompression

Spine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 434-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert K. Merrill ◽  
Lukas P. Zebala ◽  
Colleen Peters ◽  
Sheeraz A. Qureshi ◽  
Steven J. McAnany
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document