scholarly journals Reply to pretreatment depression as a prognostic indicator of survival and nutritional status in patients with head and neck cancer

Cancer ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 972-973
Author(s):  
Jong-Lyel Roh ◽  
Shin-Ae Kim
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Indicator

Nutritional Status-a Prognostic Indicator in Head and Neck Cancer

1985 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald B. Brookes
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Nutritional Deficit ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Table Analysis ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Index Estimation

A prospective study into the nutritional status of 114 patients with untreated primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was undertaken to assess its possible prognostic value for survival. Nutritional status was evaluated by anthropometry, creatinine height index estimation, serum albumin and transferrin assays, and nitrogen balance studies. Weight change and other anthropometric indices found to be the most reliable nutritional parameters were averaged to derive a clinically useful, general nutritional status score. A nutritional deficit was found in 43 of the 114 patients (37.7%) and was associated with neoplasms of the upper gastrointestinal tract in more than 80% of the patients. Life table analysis showed a statistically very highly significant difference between the survival of the adequately nourished patients (57.5% at 2 years) and the survival of the undernourished patients (7.5% at 2 years) (χ2 = 36.08; P = .0). These results indicate that nutritional deficiency is an important adverse prognostic factor in head and neck cancer. Undernutrition probably exerts its effect, at least in part, by causing secondary immunologic dysfunction.

scholarly journals Pretreatment depression as a prognostic indicator of survival and nutritional status in patients with head and neck cancer

Cancer ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin-Ae Kim ◽  
Jong-Lyel Roh ◽  
Sang-Ah Lee ◽  
Sang-wook Lee ◽  
Sung-Bae Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Indicator

scholarly journals Pretreatment depression as a prognostic indicator of survival and nutritional status in patients with head and neck cancer

Cancer ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 971-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw ◽  
Pim Cuijpers ◽  
C. Rene Leemans
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Indicator

Nutritional status as a prognostic factor in advanced head and neck cancer

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 376-376
Author(s):  
Quak ◽  
Van Bokhorst ◽  
Klop ◽  
Van Leeuwen ◽  
Snow
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Advanced Head

Prognosis in Head and Neck Cancer: Importance of Nutritional and Biological Inflammatory Status

2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982110045
Author(s):  
Nicolas Saroul ◽  
Mathilde Puechmaille ◽  
Céline Lambert ◽  
Achraf Sayed Hassan ◽  
Julian Biau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Inflammatory Response ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Inflammatory Status ◽  
Nutritional Risk Index

Objectives To determine the importance of nutritional status, social status, and inflammatory status in the prognosis of head and neck cancer. Study Design Single-center retrospective study of prospectively collected data. Setting Tertiary referral center. Methods Ninety-two consecutive patients newly diagnosed for cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract without metastases were assessed at time of diagnosis for several prognostic factors. Nutritional status was assessed by the nutritional risk index, social status by the EPICES score, and inflammatory status by the systemic inflammatory response index. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results In multivariable analysis, the main prognostic factors were the TNM classification (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.34, P = .002, for stage T3-4), malnutrition as assessed by the nutritional risk index (HR = 3.64, P = .008, for severe malnutrition), and a systemic inflammatory response index score ≥1.6 (HR = 3.32, P = .02). Social deprivation was not a prognostic factor. Conclusion Prognosis in head and neck cancer is multifactorial; however, malnutrition and inflammation are important factors that are potentially reversible by early intervention.

scholarly journals Nutritional status and dietary quality index of head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemo radiotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Author(s):  
Shirin Fattahi ◽  
Farshad Seyyednejad ◽  
Sarvin Sanaie ◽  
Tahereh Parhizkar ◽  
Elnaz Faramarzi
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Quality Index ◽  
Dietary Diversity ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Dietary Quality ◽  
Quality Indices

Introduction: Considering the important role of early detection of malnutrition in patients with cancer and its negative effects on the outcome, as well as the lack of any published article (to the best of our knowledge) about the dietary quality index in head and neck cancer patients treated with chemoradio therapy, we decided to evaluate the nutritional status and dietary quality index in these patients. Methods: In this study, thirty-seven volunteer patients with head and neck cancer were recruited. Nutritional status of the patients was evaluated by Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) questionnaire. Dietary diversity score, dietary variety score, and diet quality index–international were calculated to assess the dietary quality of the patients. Results: Our findings indicated that about half of the patients were well nourished and 48.6%were at the risk of malnutrition. We did not find any significant differences between variousdietary quality indices and nutritional status of the patients. However, a significant reverse correlation was observed between dietary quality indices and nutritional status of the patients. Conclusion: According to our findings, the evaluation of nutritional status and the prediction of the patients at higher risks of chemoradio therapy-induced adverse events, may have a major role in the prevention of treatment gaps.

scholarly journals Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator in head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Head & Neck ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 2546-2557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tristan Tham ◽  
Yonatan Bardash ◽  
Saori Wendy Herman ◽  
Peter David Costantino
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio

Elective gastrostomy, nutritional status and quality of life in advanced head and neck cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (10) ◽  
pp. 713-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall P. Morton ◽  
Victoria L. Crowder ◽  
Robert Mawdsley ◽  
Esther Ong ◽  
Mark Izzard
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Advanced Head
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document