scholarly journals Limited-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with abbreviated systemic therapy and consolidation radiotherapy

Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 118 (17) ◽  
pp. 4156-4165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belinda A. Campbell ◽  
Joseph M. Connors ◽  
Randy D. Gascoyne ◽  
W. James Morris ◽  
Tom Pickles ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Bruno Ventre ◽  
Andrés J.M. Ferreri ◽  
Mary Gospodarowicz ◽  
Silvia Govi ◽  
Carlo Messina ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jungmin Jo ◽  
Dok Hyun Yoon ◽  
Sang Wook Lee ◽  
Chan-Sik Park ◽  
Jooryung Huh ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Lamy ◽  
Gandhi Damaj ◽  
Pierre Soubeyran ◽  
Emmanuel Gyan ◽  
Guillaume Cartron ◽  
...  

Key Points For early-stage DLBCL, R-CHOP alone is not inferior to R-CHOP followed by RT.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2817-2817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry J. Savage ◽  
Mukesh Chhanabhai ◽  
Nicholas Voss ◽  
Shenkier Tamara ◽  
Randy D. Gascoyne ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) represent a heterogeneous group of diseases with an overall poor prognosis. Little information is available regarding the outcome of PTCL patients who present with limited stage disease. We sought to determine the outcome of PTCL patients presenting with limited disease in comparison with a cohort of patients with limited stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Methods: In a retrospective analysis we identified all patients with limited stage (non-bulky (<10cm) stage I/II disease no symptoms) PTCL diagnosed at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) between 1983 and 2004. Patients were excluded if they had cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (CutALCL) (n=13), NK/T-cell lymphoma nasal type (n=9) or primary CNS/ocular involvement (n=6). Results: Thirty-seven patients with PTCL were identified according to the World Health Organization Classification: ALK-neg ALCL 8 (22%); PTCL-unspecified (PTCLUS) 28 (78%); enteropathy associated TCL (EATL) 1 (3 %). The majority received CHOP-type chemotherapy (n=31, 86%), most with brief chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation (n=19, 61%). The 5 y OS and PFS was similar between PTCLUS and ALK-neg ALCL. There was no difference in survival between extranodal and nodal cases. The outcome of PTCL patients (including ALK-neg ALCL and PTCLUS) was compared to a cohort of limited stage DLBCL patients (excluding CNS/ocular lymphoma) (n=305) diagnosed over the same time period and treated similarly. There was no difference in 5 y OS or PFS (Figure 1,2). Interestingly, there were no late relapses observed in PTCLUS, in marked contrast to DLBCL. Conclusions: Limited stage PTCL is rare, however outcomes appear to be comparable to early stage DLBCL, supporting that they should be treated in a similar manner. Unlike limited stage DLBCL where late relapses occur, a plateau in the progression-free survival curve is observed, highlighting a distinct natural history for limited stage PTCL. Overall Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.18 Overall Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.18 Progression-Free Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.07 Progression-Free Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.07


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3030-3030
Author(s):  
Anita Kumar ◽  
Jocelyn C Maragulia ◽  
Matthew A Lunning ◽  
Craig H. Moskowitz ◽  
Andrew D. Zelenetz

Abstract Background Therapeutic options for limited-stage diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) include short-course R-CHOP +/- IFRT and full-course R-CHOP +/- IFRT. In the rituximab-era, few randomized prospective studies exist to compare these treatment approaches in limited-stage DLBCL. In this retrospective analysis of limited-stage DLBCL, we report 1) prognostic factors associated with outcome and treatment and 2) outcomes associated with different treatment programs including 3-4 cycles of R-CHOP +/- IFRT and 6 cycles of R-CHOP +/- IFRT. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed limited-stage DLBCL treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy with or without involved-field radiotherapy from 1999 – 2012 were included. Limited-stage DLBCL was defined as Ann Arbor stage I or stage II, non-bulky (any mass < 10 cm). Patients with primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma were excluded. Treatment programs included: A) R-CHOP x3-4 cycles, B) R-CHOP x3-4 cycles + IFRT, C) R-CHOP x6 cycles, and D) R-CHOP x6 cycles +IFRT. Results 262 pts were identified with median age 58 years (range 18-85), 55% female (N=145), and 30% stage I (N=82), 37% Stage IE (N=96), <1% stage IXEE (N=1), 18% stage II (N=46), and 14% Stage IIE (N=37). The factors associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) were age > 60 (p=0.039), elevated LDH (p=0.014), and stage II disease (p=0.015). In contrast, female sex (p=0.54), B-symptoms (0.74), presence of extranodal “E” lesion (p=0.12), and poor performance status (0.35) were not significantly associated with PFS. The stage-modified IPI (SM-IPI, including the factors: stage II (vs. I), age>60, elevated LDH, and ECOG performance status ≥2) stratified patients into prognostically relevant groups, see Figure 1. In the rituximab era, the poorest outcomes were observed in patients with SM-IPI=3 (n=21). Interim PET imaging after 3-4 cycles (interpreted with International Harmonization Project criteria) was available in 198 patients. The majority of patients achieved a negative interim PET scan, see Table 1. Positive interim PET imaging was not associated with inferior PFS, p=0.45. Among the 4 treatment programs, 17 patients received R-CHOP x3-4 cycles (A), 147 received R-CHOP x3-4 cycles + IFRT (B), 48 received R-CHOP x6 cycles (C), and 50 received R-CHOP x6 cycles +IFRT (D). Physician treatment choice appeared to be associated with clinical characteristics at presentation. To assess the clinical and demographic features associated with receipt of arm B versus C (analogous to the treatment arms in the historical study of chemotherapy versus combined modality therapy in the pre-rituximab era, SWOG 8736 (Miller, NEJM, 1998)), Chi-Square or Fisher exact tests were performed. Patients with stage II vs. I (p<0.001), B-symptoms (p<0.001), elevated LDH (p=0.03), and poor performance status (p=0.013) were significantly more likely to receive R-CHOP x6cycles versus R-CHOP x3-4cycles + IFRT. Therefore, patients with more advanced stage, systemic symptoms related to lymphoma, and elevated LDH were significantly more likely to receive full-course chemotherapy. At median follow up of 4.7 years, the outcomes were excellent with 89% PFS and 94% OS for the entire cohort. There were 30 patients who progressed or died. Of the total 19 deaths, 7 were attributable to progressive lymphoma. The outcomes were similar for the 4 treatment groups, see Table 1. Among elderly patients, either ≥ 70 years (n=65) or ≥ 60 years (n=125), there were no differences in outcomes between treatment arms. Conclusion In the rituximab-era, short-course immunochemotherapy followed by radiation appears to have equivalent efficacy when compared to long-course immunochemotherapy in this selected population of limited-stage DLBCL patients. Prospective randomized studies are needed to define the optimal treatment for limited-stage DLBCL in the rituximab era. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document