Intensive chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, high-dose methotrexate/ifosfamide, etoposide, and high-dose cytarabine (CODOX-M/IVAC) for human immunodeficiency virus-associated Burkitt lymphoma

Cancer ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 1196-1205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunice S. Wang ◽  
David J. Straus ◽  
Julie Teruya-Feldstein ◽  
Jing Qin ◽  
Carol Portlock ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3051-3051
Author(s):  
Beata Ostrowska ◽  
Michal Osowiecki ◽  
Katarzyna Domanska-Czyz ◽  
Joanna Romejko-Jarosinska ◽  
Ewa Paszkiewicz-Kozik ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Currently recommended treatment for the primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) involves high-dose methotrexate (HM) preferably in combination with high-dose cytarabine (HA). However, nearly half of the patients present with locally advanced disease and poor performance status (PS) prohibiting the use of this biologically challenging therapy. On the other hand, CHOP±Rituximab with or without HM is considered suboptimal due to generaly negative, if any, published results, and a strong belief in the existence of blood-brain barrier preventing bioavailability of doxorubicin to CNS tissue. In effect, patients with DLBCL of the CNS which is the most common type of PCNSL miss the benefits of the optimal treatment for DLBCL. We evaluated the outcome of patients treated at our institution with variety of regimens evolving over time including CHOP/CHOP-like + HM, HM ± HA, and CHOP-R (rituximab) + HM. Varying proportion of patients received whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) as well. Patients and Methods Between 2000 and 2011, 92 patients diagnosed with PCNSL were treated. Median age (range) was 59 (19 – 79) years, female: 55%, ECOG performance score (PS) 0-1: 30%, 2: 21%, 3-4: 49%. Most common symptoms at diagnosis were: memory loss (56%), focal symptoms (54%), confusion (36%), depression (20%), seizures (20%), agitation (13%). Diagnosis was established by stereotactic biopsy (50%), craniotomy (48%), and cerebro-spinal fluid flow cytometry in two cases. Total resection of tumor was done in 22%, tumor gross resection (debulking) in 27%, and biopsy only in 51% of patients. Cerebral / spinal parenchyma was involved in 52%, deep brain sites - in 48%. Mass effect and brain edema were present in 70% and 81%, respectively. Multiple brain lesions were present in 39% of patients. Patients were treated on 3 consecutive protocols: 2000-2006 (n=27): CHOP/CHOP-like+HM [median (range) HM total dose: 6.3 g (1.9-21)] with WBRT in 67%, 2006-2010 (n=13): HM±HA including „Bonn“ protocol [median (range) HM total dose 16.8 g (3-25.3) and median (range) HA total dose: 12 g(8-41)] with WBRT in 23%, 2009-2011 (n=19): CHOP-R + HM [median (range) HM total dose: 20 g (3-42)] with WBRT in 26% of patients. 33 patients (36%) received variety of treatments with a palliative intent. Results In all 92 patients, 1-, 2-, and 4-year overall survival (OS) was 50%, 41%, and 24% respectively. In patients treated with a radical approach including intended HM dose of 3 g/m2 per cycle (n=59): 1-, 2-, and 4-year OS was 63%, 59%, and 35%, respectively. In this group, event-free survival (EFS) was 58%, 49%, and 32%, respectively. In patients with PS 0-1, 2, and 3-4, 3-year OS was 67%, 26%, and 8%, respectively. 3-year EFS in these patients was 56%, 27%, and 8%, respectivly (p=0.00). Two-year OS in patients with total tumor resection, debulking, or biopsy only, was 78%, 62%, and 14%, respectively (p=0.00). Deep structure involvement vs cerebral parenchyma was not predictive of OS or EFS (p=0.33). In patients treated with CHOP/CHOP-like+HM with a median follow-up (FU) of 122 months, 1-, 2-, and 4-year OS was 59%, 55%, and 37%, and corresponding EFS was 52%, 48%, and 29%, respectively. 4 patients (15%) died of treatment-related toxicity (TRT). In patients treated with HM±HA, with a median FU of 39 months, 1-, 2-, and 4-year OS was 61%, 54%, and 18%, and corresponding EFS was 53%, 38%, and 20%, respectively. 2 patients (15%) died of TRT. In patients treated with CHOP-R+HM, with a median FU of 30 months, 1-, 2-, and 4-year OS was 68%, 68%, and 49%, and corresponding EFS was 68%, 57%, and 57%, respectively. 12 of 19 patients in this group are alive with no evidence of disease.7 patients died, 3 from disease progression, and 3 (16%) from TRT. Conclusion Outcome of PCNSL patients was highly dependent on the baseline performance score with only few patients with PS 3-4 surviving 3 years. Extent of primary surgery was also predictive of survival. In our series of 92 patients treated on consecutive clincal protocols over a period of 10 years, no benefit to methotreaxte dose escalation or addition of high-dose cytarabine could be demonstrated. The most favorable outcome was achieved with CHOP-R combined with HM at a dose of 3 g/m² per cycle. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2012 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dino Dujmovic ◽  
Igor Aurer ◽  
Ivo Radman ◽  
Ranka Serventi-Seiwerth ◽  
Snjezana Dotlic ◽  
...  

The Lancet ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 374 (9700) ◽  
pp. 1512-1520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrés JM Ferreri ◽  
Michele Reni ◽  
Marco Foppoli ◽  
Maurizio Martelli ◽  
Gerasimus A Pangalis ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2723-2723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Pineda ◽  
Juan-Manuel Sancho ◽  
Olga Garcia ◽  
Jordi Esteve ◽  
Mar Tormo ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Relapses after front-line therapy for Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia (BL) are unfrequent, and there is scarce information about the best rescue strategy for these patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of relapse, salvage treatment and prognosis after relapse in patients with BL treated with two consecutive Spanish protocols. Patients and methods: Retrospective study of patients diagnosed with BL in 40 Spanish hospitals betwen January 1997 and October 2014 treated with first line chemotherapy according to protocols PETHEMA LAL-3/97 (specific chemotherapy without rituximab) and BURKIMAB (rituximab plus specific chemotherapy). The demographic, clinical and biological characteristics were collected at the time of diagnosis and at relapse, as well as the salvage treatment and outcomes. Results: 233 patients were diagnosed with Burkitt lymphoma (n=150) or leukemia (n=83) and received first-line therapy according to PETHEMA LAL-3/97 (n=53) and BURKIMAB (n=180) protocols. Baseline characteristics at diagnosis are described in Table 1. A total of 26 patients relapsed, 11 (28%) treated with PETHEMA LAL-3/97 protocol and 15 (10%) with BURKIMAB protocol (p=0.009). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 10 years was 27% (95% CI, 12%-42%) in PETHEMA LAL-3/97 protocol vs.16% (95% CI, 4%-28%) in BURKIMAB protocol (p= 0.013) (Figure 1). Time to relapse was shorter in PETHEMA LAL-3/97 protocol (median of 3.7 months) vs. BURKIMAB protocol (6.3 months), but it was not significant (p=0.506). No differences were observed in relapse incidence between Burkitt leukemia and Burkitt lymphoma in PETHEMA LAL-3/97 protocol (6/31 vs. 5/22, p=1) and BURKIMAB protocol (7/41 vs. 8/107, p=0.124). Out of 15 patients in whom rescue treatment strategy was evaluable, 12 received chemotherapy with high-dose methotrexate and/or cytarabine (4 of the them followed response, CR in 2, followed by SCT in the 2 patients achieving PR [autologous in one and allogeneic SCT in the other]), and the remaining 3 patients received DA-EPOCH-R (n=1, achieving CR), R-ICE (n=1, no response) and paliative care (n=1). At the time of the analysis, only 3 patients are alive. Median overall survival after relapse was 3 months (95% CI, 0.9-5.1) for PETHEMA LAL-3/97 relapsed group and 3.6 months (95% CI, 0.1-7.1) for BURKIMAB relapsed patients group. Conclusions: Patients with Burkitt leukemia/lymphoma treated with specific immunochemotherapy have lower probability of relapse compared with those treated with specific chemotherapy without rituximab. In our series, the most frequent regimens administered for the treatment of relapsed patients were based in high-dose methotrexate and/or cytarabine. The prognosis of relapsed Burkitt leukemia/lymphoma is poor, independently of the type of rescue therapy. Supported by grants RD12/0036/0029 (RTICC, FEDER), Instituto Carlos III, Spain. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document