scholarly journals Childhood cancer survival in Europe and the United States

Cancer ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 95 (8) ◽  
pp. 1767-1772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gemma Gatta ◽  
Riccardo Capocaccia ◽  
Michel P. Coleman ◽  
Lynn A. Gloeckler Ries ◽  
Franco Berrino
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Childhood Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Childhood Cancer Survival

Racial/ethnic disparities in childhood cancer survival in the United States: Mediation effects of health insurance coverage and area-level social deprivation.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 143-143
Author(s):  
Jingxuan Zhao ◽  
Xuesong Han ◽  
Zhiyuan Zheng ◽  
Leticia Maciel Nogueira ◽  
Paul C. Nathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Childhood Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Social Deprivation ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Ethnic Disparities ◽  
The United States ◽  
Childhood Cancer Survival ◽  
Racial Ethnic

143 Background: Childhood cancer survival varies by race/ethnicity in the United States. This study evaluated the impact of potentially modifiable characteristics - health insurance and area-level social deprivation - on racial/ethnic disparities in childhood cancer survival nationwide. Methods: We identified 65,113 childhood cancer patients aged < 18 years newly diagnosed with any of 10 common cancer types (e.g. central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), Hodgkin lymphoma) from the 2004-2014 National Cancer Database. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare survival probabilities by race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic white (NHW) vs non-Hispanic black (NHB), Hispanic, and non-Hispanic other (NH other)) for each cancer type. We conducted mediation analyses by the mma R package to evaluate the racial/ethnic survival disparities mediated by health insurance (private, Medicaid, and uninsured) and social deprivation index (SDI) quartile. SDI is a composite measure of deprivation based on seven characteristics (e.g. income, education, employment). Results: Compared to NHW, worse survival were observed for NHB (HR (hazard ratio): 1.4, 95% CI: 1.3-1.5), Hispanic (HR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.2), and NH other (HR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.3) for all cancer sites combined after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics other than health insurance and SDI. Health insurance explained 20% of the survival disparities and SDI explained 19% of the disparity between NHB vs NHW; health insurance explained 48% of the survival disparities and SDI explained 45% of the disparity between Hispanic vs NHW. For ALL, health insurance significantly explained 15% and 18% of the survival disparities between NHB and Hispanic vs NHW, respectively. SDI significantly explained 19% and 31% of the disparities, respectively. Conclusions: Health insurance and SDI mediated racial/ethnic survival disparities for several childhood cancers. Expanding insurance coverage and improving healthcare access in disadvantaged areas may effectively reduce disparities for these cancer sites.

scholarly journals Outcomes for Children and Adolescents With Cancer: Challenges for the Twenty-First Century

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15) ◽  
pp. 2625-2634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm A. Smith ◽  
Nita L. Seibel ◽  
Sean F. Altekruse ◽  
Lynn A.G. Ries ◽  
Danielle L. Melbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Childhood Cancer ◽  
Cancer Mortality ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
The United States ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Childhood Cancers ◽  
Essential Information ◽  
The Impact

Purpose This report provides an overview of current childhood cancer statistics to facilitate analysis of the impact of past research discoveries on outcome and provide essential information for prioritizing future research directions. Methods Incidence and survival data for childhood cancers came from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 9 (SEER 9) registries, and mortality data were based on deaths in the United States that were reported by states to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention by underlying cause. Results Childhood cancer incidence rates increased significantly from 1975 through 2006, with increasing rates for acute lymphoblastic leukemia being most notable. Childhood cancer mortality rates declined by more than 50% between 1975 and 2006. For leukemias and lymphomas, significantly decreasing mortality rates were observed throughout the 32-year period, though the rate of decline slowed somewhat after 1998. For remaining childhood cancers, significantly decreasing mortality rates were observed from 1975 to 1996, with stable rates from 1996 through 2006. Increased survival rates were observed for all categories of childhood cancers studied, with the extent and temporal pace of the increases varying by diagnosis. Conclusion When 1975 age-specific death rates for children are used as a baseline, approximately 38,000 childhood malignant cancer deaths were averted in the United States from 1975 through 2006 as a result of more effective treatments identified and applied during this period. Continued success in reducing childhood cancer mortality will require new treatment paradigms building on an increased understanding of the molecular processes that promote growth and survival of specific childhood cancers.

Breast cancer survival rates among Chinese women born in East Asia and the United States

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 634-634
Author(s):  
S CHUANG ◽  
W CHEN ◽  
M HASHIBE ◽  
G LI ◽  
P GANZ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
United States ◽  
East Asia ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Chinese Women ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
The United States ◽  
Breast Cancer Survival

Childhood cancer survival in Europe

2001 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 810-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Terracini ◽  
J.-W. Coebergh ◽  
G. Gatta ◽  
C. Magnani ◽  
C. Stiller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Childhood Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Childhood Cancer Survival

scholarly journals Improvement in childhood cancer survival in Lithuania over three decades

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jelena Rascon ◽  
Giedrė Smailytė
Keyword(s):  
Childhood Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Early Years ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Background Population ◽  
Childhood Cancer Survival

Background. Population-based EUROCARE-5 studies demonstrated that childhood cancer survival rates in Lithuania were 10–20% lower than the European mean. We aimed to analyse the change in the outcome of treatment of paediatric malignancies in Lithuania over 30 years. Methods. A single-centre retrospective analysis of children below 18 years of age treated for cancer at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos between 1982 and 2011 was carried out. The minimal requirement of 5-year follow-up after diagnosis was specified for survival estimation. The vital status was assessed using data from the population-based Lithuanian Cancer Registry. To evaluate changes over time, the entire cohort was split into three groups according to the time of diagnosis: 1982–1991, 1992–2001, and 2002–2011. Results. A total of 1268 children met the inclusion criteria. The shortest median follow-up was 8.9 (IQR 6.4–11.5) years for patients treated in the third decade. The 5-year overall survival of the entire cohort increased from 37.3% (95% CI 30.2–44.3) in 1982–1991 to 70.7% (95% CI 66.4–74.1) in 2002–2011 (p < 0.0001). The same trend was evident when calculated separately for leukaemia (p < 0.0001), lymphoma (p < 0.0005), and solid tumours (p < 0.004). The percentage of cure rose from zero in the early years of the period analysed to 80% in 2010 and 2011. The improvement in the treatment outcome was attributable to the reduction of treatment-related mortality from 45.8% in 1982–1991 to 12.4% in 2002–2011 and disease recurrence from 30.4% to 19.6% for the same periods, respectively. Conclusions. Significant progress in the cure rate of children treated for cancer at our institution was observed over 30 years. Collaborative national and international clinical and research efforts are crucial to ensure further advances in care and cure.

Poor Survival for US Pacific Islander Cancer Patients: Evidence From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database: 1991 to 2004

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (36) ◽  
pp. 5738-5741 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Goggins ◽  
Grace K.C. Wong
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
African Americans ◽  
Native Americans ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Native Hawaiians ◽  
Targeted Interventions ◽  
Female Breast ◽  
Cause Specific Survival ◽  
End Results

Purpose Although racial and ethnic differences in cancer survival in the United States have been studied extensively, little is known about cancer survival in US Pacific Islanders (PIs), a fast-growing and economically disadvantaged minority group. Methods Using data from the US National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries, we compared cause-specific and all-cause survival for female breast, prostate, lung, colorectal, stomach and liver cancer for Native Hawaiians, Samoans, other PIs (including Tongans, Guamanians, and others), African Americans, and Native Americans with non-Hispanic whites using Cox proportional hazards models. Separate models were fitted adjusting for demographic factors only and demographic and disease severity variables. Results Among all groups, Samoans were the most likely to present with advanced disease and had the worst cause-specific survival for all sites considered. Samoans had particularly poor results (adjusted for demographic variables only) for female breast (relative risk [RR] = 3.05; 95% CI, 2.31 to 4.02), colorectal (RR = 1.82; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.41) and prostate (RR = 4.82; 95% CI, 3.38 to 6.88) cancers. Native Hawaiians and other PIs also had significantly worse cause-specific survival than did non-Hispanic whites for most sites, but generally had better survival than African Americans or Native Americans. Conclusion Much of the survival disadvantage for PI groups appears to be a result of late diagnosis, and thus targeted interventions have much potential to reduce cancer mortality in this group. More research is needed to find explanations for the particularly poor cancer survival for Samoans in the United States.

Cancer Survival Is (Mostly) Improving

Pained ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 245-246
Author(s):  
Michael D. Stein ◽  
Sandro Galea
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
United States ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cervical Cancers

This chapter discusses how the 5-year survival rates for the most common cancers in the United States improved by nearly 20% since the 1970s. While promising overall, low survival rates persist for pancreatic, liver, lung, esophageal, brain, and many other cancers. Meanwhile, 5-year survival for uterine and cervical cancers worsened. Pancreatic cancer has the lowest 5-year survival rate at 8.2%. In contrast, prostate cancer had the greatest 5-year survival increase from 67.8% to 98.6%, most likely reflecting a substantial uptick in prostate cancer screening and early detection. Five-year survival with leukemia also improved significantly, from 34.2% to 60.6%, likely resulting from improved treatments. As such, in both detection and treatment, the United States is making progress. For the millions of Americans who face a cancer diagnosis, this is cause for hope.

Secondary Prevention 1: Cancers and Principles of Screening

2010 ◽  
pp. 141-157
Author(s):  
Martha P. Millman ◽  
Paul J. Limburg
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Task Force ◽  
The United States ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Level Of Education ◽  
Screening Strategies ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines

Screening tests are used to differentiate between persons with and without the condition of interest in a defined population. Screening strategies, or mass screening, is applied relatively indiscriminately to a population. Cancer is the second-leading overall cause of death in the United States; however, it is the leading cause of death for those under 85. Cancer risk is associated with environmental risk factors. Racial disparities in cancer incidence and death persist in the United States; level of education also appears to affect cancer survival. The United States Preventive Services Task Force has established evidence-based guidelines for screening, counseling, and chemoprevention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document