scholarly journals Risk indicators for death and prognosis among patients in whom acute myocardial infarction was not confirmed in relation to prescription of beta blockers at discharge

1995 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Herlitz ◽  
B. W. Karlson ◽  
ÅA. Hjalmarson
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Risk Indicators

Abstract 3522: Transfer Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Do Not Impact Hospital Quality Measurements, Despite Being Sicker Than Directly Admitted Patients

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Creighton Don ◽  
Douglas Stewart ◽  
Susan Heckbert ◽  
Charles Maynard ◽  
Richard Goss
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Hospital Quality ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Hospital Level ◽  
Risk Of Death

BACKGROUND Studies of hospital quality and national performance measures for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) frequently exclude transfer patients. Little is known about the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with AMI transferred for revascularization. HYPOTHESIS Transfer patients have greater clinical comorbidity and worse hospital survival than non-transfer patients, and negatively impact hospital quality measures. METHODS A retrospective-cohort study was performed using all patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction who underwent coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in Washington State from 2002 – 2005. Data on clinical and procedural characteristics, medications, and complications were obtained from the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program. Hospitals were compared by rates of death and discharge with aspirin, beta-blockers, lipid lowering agents, and ACE inhibitors. Logistic regression was used for adjusted analysis. RESULTS Of patients undergoing revascularization for AMI, 7080 were directly admitted and 2910 were transferred. Diabetes (23.4 v. 19.7%, p<0.01), hypertension (61.3 v. 55.7%, p<0.01), and thrombolysis (32.3 v. 3.4%, p <0.01) were greater among transfers. Transfers presented with a higher rate of left main and three-vessel disease, intra-aortic balloon pump use (6.4 v. 3.6%, p<0.01) and underwent CABG more frequently (15.4 v. 5.5%, p <0.01). Transfer patients had a lower risk of death (3.9 v. 4.9%, p=0.03), but no difference in discharge medication prescription. Adjusting for major risk factors, procedure, and hospital type, transfers had a similar risk for in-hospital death compared to non-transfers (OR 0.9, CI 0.5 – 1.6). Hospitals with a high percentage of transfers treated higher-risk patients, but had similar outcomes to those with few transfers. Excluding transfers from the hospital-level analysis did not appreciably change these results. CONCLUSION Transfers were higher-risk, but had similar in-hospital mortality and were equally likely to receive appropriate medication at discharge compared to directly admitted patients. Inclusion of transfers did not affect hospital-level inpatient mortality or measurements of adherence to quality guidelines.

Abstract 12691: Long-term Optimal Medical Therapy for Patients With Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
YeeKyoung KO ◽  
Seungjae JOO ◽  
Jong Wook Beom ◽  
Jae-Geun Lee ◽  
Joon-Hyouk CHOI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Medical Therapy ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ras Inhibitors

Introduction: In the era of the initial optimal interventional and medical therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), a number of patients with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (40% <EF<50%) becomes increasing. However, the long-term optimal medical therapy for these patients has been rarely studied. Aims: This observational study aimed to investigate the association between the medical therapy with beta-blockers or inhibitors of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and clinical outcomes in patients with mid-range EF after AMI. Methods: Among 13,624 patients enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health (KAMIR-NIH), propensity-score matched patients who survived the initial attack and had mid-range EF were selected according to beta-blocker or RAS inhibitor therapy at discharge. Results: Patients with beta-blockers showed significantly lower 1-year cardiac death (2.4 vs. 5.2/100 patient-year; hazard ratio [HR] 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.98; P =0.045) and MI (1.7 vs. 4.0/100 patient-year; HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.95; P =0.037). On the other hand, RAS inhibitors were associated with lower 1-year re-hospitalization due to heart failure (2.8 vs. 5.5/100 patient-year; HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.92; P =0.024), and no significant interaction with classes of RAS inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) was observed ( P for interaction=0.332). Conclusions: Beta-blockers or RAS inhibitors at discharge were associated with better 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with mid-range EF after AMI.

P6424The association between long-term beta-blocker use and outcome in a contemporary large-scale cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C X Song ◽  
R Fu ◽  
J G Yang ◽  
K F Dou ◽  
Y J Yang
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Background Controversy exists regarding the use of beta-blockers (BBs) among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in contemporary reperfusion era. Previous studies predominantly focused on beta-blockers prescribed at discharge, and the effect of long-term adherence to beta-blocker on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) remains unclear. Objective To explore the association between long-term beta-blocker use patterns and MACE among contemporary AMI patients. Methods We enrolled 7860 patients with AMI, who were discharged alive and prescribed with BBs based on CAMI registry from January 2013 to September 2014. Patients were divided into two groups according to BBs use pattern: Always users group (n=4476) were defined as patients reporting BBs use at both 6- and 12-month follow-up; Inconsistent users group were defined as patients reporting at least once not using BBs at 6- or 12-month follow-up. Primary outcome was defined as MACE at 24-month follow-up, including all-cause death, non-fatal MI and repeat-revascularization. Multivariable cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the association between BBs and MACE. Results Baseline characteristics are shown in table 1. At 2-year follow-up, 518 patients in inconsistent users group (15.6%) and 548 patients in always users group (12.3%) had MACE. After multivariable adjustment, inconsistent use of BBs was associated with higher risk of MACE (HR: 1.323, 95% CI: 1.171–1.493, p<0.001). Table 1 Baseline characteristics Variable Always user (N=4476) Inconsistent user (N=3384) P value Age (years) 60.6±12.0 61.2±12.2 <0.001 Male 3381 (75.7%) 2461 (74.3%) 0.084 Diabetes 892 (20.0%) 610 (18.4%) 0.003 Hypertension 2372 (53.2%) 1543 (46.6%) <0.001 Dyslipidemia 244 (5.5%) 126 (3.8%) <0.001 Prior myocardial infarction 351 (7.9%) 232 (7.0%) <0.001 Heart failure 88 (2.0%) 63 (1.9%) <0.001 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 66 (1.5%) 60 (1.8%) <0.001 Current smoker 2054 (46.1%) 1579 (47.8%) 0.179 Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) 53.7±11.48 54.0±10.9 <0.001 Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events 548 (12.3%) 518 (15.6%) <0.001 Conclusions Our results showed consistent BBs use was associated with reduced risk of MACE among patients with AMI managed by contemporary treatment. Acknowledgement/Funding CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2016-I2M-1-009)

scholarly journals RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE OCCURRENCE OF EARLY COMPLICATIONS OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AFTER CARDIO-INTERVENTION TREATMENT

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 1245-1251
Author(s):  
Iryna A. Holovanova ◽  
Grygori A. Oksak ◽  
Iryna M. Tkachenko ◽  
Maxim V. Khorosh ◽  
Mariia M. Tovstiak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Risk Indicators ◽  
Interventional Treatment ◽  
Early Complications ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Intervention Treatment

The aim of our study was to identify the main risk factors for the occurrence of early complications of acute myocardial infarction after cardio-interventional treatment and to evaluate prognostic risk indicators. Materials and methods: Risk factors of myocardial infarction were determined by copying the case history data and calculating on their basis of the odds ratio and ±95% confidence interval. After it, we made a prediction of the risk of early complications of AMI with cardiovascular intervention by using a Cox regression that took into account the patient’s transportation time by ambulance. Results: Thus, the factors that increase the chances of their occurrence were: summer time of year; recurrent myocardial infarction of another specified localization (I122.8); the relevance of the established STEMI diagnosis; diabetes mellitus; renal pathology; smoking; high rate of BMI. Factors that reduce the chances of their occurrence: men gender – in 35%; the age over of 70 – by 50%; the timely arrival of an emergency medical team – by 55%. The factors that increase the chances of their occurrence were: age over 70 years; subsequent myocardial infarction of unspecified site; diabetes mellitus. Using of a Cox regression analysis, it was proved that the cumulative risk of early complications of AMI with cardio-intervention treatment increased from the 10th minute of ambulance arrival at place, when ECG diagnosis (STEMI), presence of diabetes mellitus, smoking and high BMI. Conclusions: As a result of the conducted research, the risk factors for early complications of AIM with cardio-interventional treatment were identified.

Abstract 184: Patterns of Outpatient Follow-up after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Follow-up Frequency is Associated with Utilization of Evidence-based Therapies

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Vigen ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Thomas M Maddox ◽  
Stacie Daugherty ◽  
Steven M Bradley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Multivariable Analyses

Background: ACC/AHA guidelines recommend that patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) follow-up within several weeks of hospital discharge. Recommendations regarding intensity of following-up in the year following AMI are not provided. The relationship between frequency of follow-up and use of evidence-based therapies following AMI is unknown. Methods: 6,838 patients from 2 multicenter prospective AMI registries, PREMIER and TRIUMPH registries were studied. We divided the number of patient self-reported outpatient follow-up visits with cardiologists, primary care providers, or both into tertiles: low, medium, and high. The primary outcome was use of statins, beta blockers, aspirin, ACE/ARBs, and a composite of all four medications at 12 months among eligible patients. The association between tertiles of visits following AMI among patients who had at least one visit and primary outcome was evaluated using hierarchical multivariable modified Poisson models. Results: Mean number of follow-up visits in the year following AMI was 6 (IQR 3 - 8) and 189 (4%) of patients had no visits. In lowest tertile, patients had 1 to < 4 visits, in the medium tertile, 4 to < 7 visits, and in highest tertile, 7 to 59 visits. Patients in medium and high intensity tertiles were older, more likely to have insurance, and had higher GRACE 6-month mortality risk scores compared to the lowest tertile. In multivariable analyses, patients in the medium tertile were more likely to use statins and ASA than those in the lowest tertile (Figure). There were no differences in use of individual medications when comparing the highest and medium tertiles although individuals in the highest tertile were less likely to use all four medications. Conclusions: Significant variability exists in follow-up frequency following AMI and 4% of the cohort had no follow-up. Patients who had medium intensity visits were more likely to use some evidence-based medications than those with low intensity. Higher intensity visits was not associated with greater medication use. It is possible that the observed differences may be attributed to unmeasured differences among patients rather than the actual follow-up visits. Prospective studies are needed to assess key elements of outpatient visits that may lead to better utilization of evidence-based therapies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document