Confidence intervals for the mean of a population containing many zero values under unequal-probability sampling

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 582-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanfeng Chen ◽  
Jiahua Chen ◽  
Shun-Yi Chen
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-249
Author(s):  
Yves G. Berger ◽  
İklim Gedik Balay

AbstractWe propose an estimator for the Gini coefficient, based on a ratio of means. We show how bootstrap and empirical likelihood can be combined to construct confidence intervals. Our simulation study shows the estimator proposed is usually less biased than customary estimators. The observed coverages of the empirical likelihood confidence interval proposed are also closer to the nominal value.


2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Temesgen

High within- and among-tree crown variation have contributed to the difficulty of tree-crown sampling and single-tree leaf area (area available for photosynthesis) estimation. Using reconstructed trees, simulations were used to compare five sampling designs for bias, mean square error (MSE), and distribution of the estimates. All sampling designs showed nearly zero bias. For most sample trees, stratified random sampling resulted in the lowest MSE values, followed by ellipsoidal, two-stage systematic, simple random, and then by two-stage unequal probability sampling. The poor performance of two-stage unequal probability sampling can be ascribed to the unequal probability of inclusion of first-order branches and twigs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document