scholarly journals Nottingham Prognostic Index Plus: Validation of a clinical decision making tool in breast cancer in an independent series

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R Green ◽  
Daniele Soria ◽  
Jacqueline Stephen ◽  
Desmond G Powe ◽  
Christopher C Nolan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Nottingham Prognostic Index ◽  
Independent Series ◽  
Decision Making Tool

scholarly journals Nottingham Prognostic Index Plus (NPI+): a modern clinical decision making tool in breast cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 110 (7) ◽  
pp. 1688-1697 ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Rakha ◽  
D Soria ◽  
A R Green ◽  
C Lemetre ◽  
D G Powe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Nottingham Prognostic Index ◽  
Decision Making Tool

B2 Prognostic Score: External Validation of a Clinical Decision-making Tool for Metastatic Breast Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 333-339
Author(s):  
Tanja Nadine Stueber ◽  
Manfred Wischnewsky ◽  
Elena Leinert ◽  
Joachim Diessner ◽  
Catharina Bartmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Decision Making Tool

scholarly journals Analysing Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Patient Management: A Prospective Observational Evaluation of Team Clinical Decision-Making

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 559-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. K. Gandamihardja ◽  
T. Soukup ◽  
S. McInerney ◽  
J. S. A. Green ◽  
N. Sevdalis
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Management ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision

Nuclear scans: A clinical decision making tool that reduces the need for cardiac catheterization

1987 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller ◽  
Richard M. Steingart ◽  
John P. Wexler ◽  
Jonathan Tobin ◽  
Nancy Budner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cardiac Catheterization ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Decision Making Tool

scholarly journals Clinical decision making in the provision of audiovisual care for upper limb trauma: a survey of UK experiences

Hand Therapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 175899832097213
Author(s):  
Emily McMullen ◽  
Megan Robson ◽  
Mark Paul Brewin ◽  
Poonam Valand ◽  
Leela Sayed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Service Planning ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Visual Technology ◽  
Limb Trauma ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Decision Making Tool

Introduction For many patients, audio-visual appointments have provided a timely and efficient way of seeking advice, assessment and treatment for their hand injuries during the NHS response to COVID-19. This study aimed to explore the experience of hand units across the UK in determining the safe and judicious use of audio-visual outpatient care for the management of acute upper limb trauma. Methods An online cross-sectional survey was sent to the therapy leads of hand units across the UK. Questions focused on the experience of using audio-visual technology in the management of upper limb trauma, and the relevant factors in determining its appropriate use. A deductive mixed methods analysis was used to identify both common themes and capture community experience and characteristics. Results A total of 51 out of 76 hand therapy units completed the survey; a response rate of 67%. Of these, 82% (42/51) reported using audio-visual technology to manage upper limb trauma during the UK COVID-19 lockdown. When determining patient suitability for audio-visual consultations, 73% (37/51) of respondents reported the use of COVID-19 guidelines, but only 35% (18/51) reported the use of a clinical decision-making tool. In agreement with our experience at Salisbury Hospital Foundation Trust, 92% (47/51) had concerns relating to the use of audio-visual care. Conclusion The choice of safely managed remote care or in-person consultation has, to date, largely relied on the discretion of the clinician. A carefully designed clinical decision-making tool for the management of upper limb trauma is needed for use both in clinical practice and in future service planning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document