Dry Reforming and Reverse Water Gas Shift: Alternatives for Syngas Production?

2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekkehard Schwab ◽  
Andrian Milanov ◽  
Stephan Andreas Schunk ◽  
Axel Behrens ◽  
Nicole Schödel
Catalysts ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 741
Author(s):  
Agata Łamacz ◽  
Paulina Jagódka ◽  
Michalina Stawowy ◽  
Krzysztof Matus

In this work, the carbon nanotubes (CNT)-supported nanosized, well-dispersed, CeZrO2 and Ni-CeZrO2 catalysts were obtained and tested for the first time in the reaction of methane dry reforming (DRM). The performance of the hybrid materials was compared with the performance of Ni/CNT catalyst. The mechanism of the DRM reaction and the occurrence of reverse water gas shift reaction (RWGS) and CO2 deoxidation were discussed in terms of catalysts composition. The contribution of RWGS and CO2 deoxidation in the DRM process, demonstrating an increased CO2 consumption when compared to CH4, and H2/CO < 1, varied depending on the catalyst composition, was also studied.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 5543-5549
Author(s):  
Seong Bin Jo ◽  
Jin Hyeok Woo ◽  
Jong Heon Lee ◽  
Tae Young Kim ◽  
Hu In Kang ◽  
...  

CO2 green technologies, such as methanation, reverse water-gas shift (rWGS), and dry reforming of methane (DRM) in CO2 capture and direct utilization process are developed using Ni/CaO catal-sorbents.


Fuel ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 315 ◽  
pp. 123097
Author(s):  
Loukia-Pantzechroula Merkouri ◽  
Estelle le Saché ◽  
Laura Pastor-Pérez ◽  
Melis S. Duyar ◽  
Tomas Ramirez Reina

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Zubrin ◽  
Mitchell Clapp ◽  
Tom Meyer ◽  
Robert Zubrin ◽  
Mitchell Clapp ◽  
...  

Reactions ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-146
Author(s):  
Yali Yao ◽  
Baraka Celestin Sempuga ◽  
Xinying Liu ◽  
Diane Hildebrandt

In order to explore co-production alternatives, a once-through process for CO2 hydrogenation to chemicals and liquid fuels was investigated experimentally. In this approach, two different catalysts were considered; the first was a Cu-based catalyst that hydrogenates CO2 to methanol and CO and the second a Fisher–Tropsch (FT) Co-based catalyst. The two catalysts were loaded into different reactors and were initially operated separately. The experimental results show that: (1) the Cu catalyst was very active in both the methanol synthesis and reverse-water gas shift (R-WGS) reactions and these two reactions were restricted by thermodynamic equilibrium; this was also supported by an Aspen plus simulation of an (equilibrium) Gibbs reactor. The Aspen simulation results also indicated that the reactor can be operated adiabatically under certain conditions, given that the methanol reaction is exothermic and R-WGS is endothermic. (2) the FT catalyst produced mainly CH4 and short chain saturated hydrocarbons when the feed was CO2/H2. When the two reactors were coupled in series and the presence of CO in the tail gas from the first reactor (loaded with Cu catalyst) significantly improves the FT product selectivity toward higher carbon hydrocarbons in the second reactor compared to the standalone FT reactor with only CO2/H2 in the feed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document