11.01: Shaking table tests on cold-formed steel building sheathed with gypsum panels

ce/papers ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 2847-2856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Macillo ◽  
Bianca Bucciero ◽  
Maria Teresa Terracciano ◽  
Tatiana Pali ◽  
Luigi Fiorino ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Haeyoung Kim ◽  
Kunio Mizutani ◽  
Syojiro Motoyui

During the Great East Japan Earthquake of March 2011, nonstructural components, such as pipe systems, ducts, cable racks and ceilings were severely damaged while main structural members in the building were not damaged seriously. Pipes, cable racks, apparatus and ducts’ hanger bolts were ruptured causing the equipment to fall down. Because of these damages, buildings cannot be used for a long period of time and one person was killed by pipe’s falling in Japan. In this study, the behaviors of nonstructural components are investigated by conducting shaking table tests to verify the cause of damage. More specifically, damage to hanger bolts is investigated by simulating its rupturing mechanism through shaking table test. To simulate the real installation condition of nonstructural components, apparatus-duct-pipe system supported by hanger bolts is selected as specimen. Roof floor response wave at the actual 5-story steel building under the Great East Japan Earthquake and sweep wave are used for the input waves. The maximum response acceleration was about 4 G in X direction under response wave 75% and the damage occurred at the metal fitting which is the connection part between braces and hanger bolt. And without installing braces, the upper hanger bolts at the fixed supporting part were ruptured easily since the natural frequency of the specimen closed to those of target building during excitations and the response became huge.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liqiang Jiang ◽  
Jihong Ye

Seismic fragility of steel-sheathed cold-formed steel-framed (CFSF) structures is scarcely investigated; thus, the information for estimation of seismic losses of the steel-sheathed CFSF buildings is insufficient. This study aims to investigate the seismic fragility of steel-sheathed CFSF buildings with different wall configurations. Analytic models for four 2-story steel-sheathed CFSF buildings are established based on shaking table tests on steel-sheathed CFS walls. Then, a group of fragility curves for these buildings are generated. The results show that the thickness of steel sheathing and the fastener spacing of the wall have significant impact on seismic fragility of steel-sheathed CFSF buildings. The seismic fragility of the CFSF building can be reduced by increasing the thickness of steel sheathing or decreasing the fastener spacing. By increasing the thickness of steel sheathing, the reduction on probability is more obvious for the CP limit. It is also found that the exceeding probability is approximately linear with fastener spacing, with a slope in the range from 0.25%/mm to 0.50%/mm.


Author(s):  
C. S. Tsai ◽  
C. I. Hsueh ◽  
H. C. Su

This paper is aimed at the performance evaluation of the multiple direction-optimized friction pendulum system (MDO-FPS) with multiple sliding interfaces on seismic mitigation through a series of shaking table tests of a full scale building isolated with MDO-FPS isolators. Experimental tests of a three-story steel building of 40 tons in total weight, 3m and 4.5m in length and width, respectively, in two horizontal directions and 9m in height, subjected to various types of earthquakes were carried out to investigate the efficiency of the isolators in reducing structural responses during earthquakes. Results obtained from the shaking table tests demonstrate that the roof accelerations, base shears, column shear forces have been remarkably reduced while compared to the responses of a traditionally designed structure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 106675
Author(s):  
Anastasios Tsiavos ◽  
Anastasios Sextos ◽  
Andreas Stavridis ◽  
Matt Dietz ◽  
Luiza Dihoru ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 242 ◽  
pp. 112517
Author(s):  
Hanyun Zhang ◽  
Cai Jiang ◽  
Shuming Liu ◽  
Liaojun Zhang ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 103775
Author(s):  
Xuanming Ding ◽  
Yanling Zhang ◽  
Qi Wu ◽  
Zhixiong Chen ◽  
Chenglong Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document