Biosynthesized Iron Sulfide Nanocluster Enhanced Anodic Current Generation by Sulfate Reducing Bacteria in Microbial Fuel Cells

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (24) ◽  
pp. 4015-4020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muralidharan Murugan ◽  
Waheed Miran ◽  
Takuya Masuda ◽  
Dae S. Lee ◽  
Akihiro Okamoto
Keyword(s):  
Fuel Cells ◽  
Microbial Fuel Cells ◽  
Iron Sulfide ◽  
Sulfate Reducing Bacteria ◽  
Anodic Current ◽  
Current Generation ◽  
Sulfate Reducing ◽  
Reducing Bacteria

Contribution of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria to the Electricity Generation in Microbial Fuel Cells

2014 ◽  
Vol 1008-1009 ◽  
pp. 285-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong Yang Gao ◽  
Ai Jie Wang ◽  
Yang Guo Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Fuel Cells ◽  
Power Density ◽  
Microbial Fuel Cells ◽  
Electricity Generation ◽  
Desulfovibrio Desulfuricans ◽  
Sulfate Reducing Bacteria ◽  
Microbial Community Analysis ◽  
Electricity Production ◽  
Sulfate Reducing ◽  
Reducing Bacteria

Double-chambered microbial fuel cells (MFCs) were used to investigate the effect of sulfate and sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) on electricity generation by molybdate inhibition coupled with PCR-DGGE technique. Results showed that low influent sulfate (< 1470 mg/L) improved power density and voltage, while higher sulfate blocked the MFC efficiency. Molybdate inhibited the activity of SRB and consequently decreased MFC voltage and power density which confirmed some SRB were involved in the electricity generation. Microbial community analysis indicated thatDesulfovibrio desulfuricanscontributed to the electricity production and stability of MFC.

Mixed sulfate-reducing bacteria-enriched microbial fuel cells for the treatment of wastewater containing copper

Chemosphere ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 189 ◽  
pp. 134-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waheed Miran ◽  
Jiseon Jang ◽  
Mohsin Nawaz ◽  
Asif Shahzad ◽  
Sang Eun Jeong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fuel Cells ◽  
Microbial Fuel Cells ◽  
Sulfate Reducing Bacteria ◽  
Sulfate Reducing ◽  
Reducing Bacteria

Effects of Nutrition on Mild Steel Corrosion by Sulfate Reducing Bacteria under Aerobic Environment

2015 ◽  
Vol 814 ◽  
pp. 625-630
Author(s):  
Dong Xia Duan ◽  
Cun Guo Lin ◽  
Guang Zhou Liu ◽  
Ping Yao
Keyword(s):  
Mild Steel ◽  
Culture Medium ◽  
Iron Sulfide ◽  
Steel Corrosion ◽  
Sulfate Reducing Bacteria ◽  
Marine Water ◽  
Sulfate Reducing ◽  
Mild Steel Corrosion ◽  
Artificial Biofilm ◽  
Reducing Bacteria

Sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) are traditionally considered as anaerobic organism. In this paper, the potential of sulfate reducing bacteria to cause mild steel corrosion under aerobic situation was investigated. Natural biopolymer agar and sulfate reducing bacteria cells were used to produce artificial biofilm. Micro-sensors were used to investigate the microenvironment in artificial biofilm. Environmental scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy were used to study mild steel corrosion covered by artificial biofilm. The results indicated that SRB could grow and reduce sulfate both in suspension and in biofilm. The hydrogen sulfide produced by SRB and mild steel corrosion were influenced by the nutrients in the environment. The concentration of H2S in SRB biofilm exposed to culture medium was as twenty times as that exposed to marine water. The main corrosion product of mild steel in culture medium was iron sulfide, whereas the main product of mild steel in marine water was iron oxide.

The effect of gram-positive (Desulfosporosinus orientis) and gram-negative (Desulfovibrio desulfuricans) sulfate-reducing bacteria on iron sulfide mineral precipitation

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
pp. 629-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Stanley ◽  
Gordon Southam
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Iron Sulfide ◽  
Desulfovibrio Desulfuricans ◽  
Sulfate Reducing Bacteria ◽  
Sulfide Mineral ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Sulfate Reducing ◽  
Cell Autolysis ◽  
Reducing Bacteria

Growth of two dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria, Desulfosporosinus orientis (gram-positive) and Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (gram-negative), in a chemically defined culture medium resulted in similar growth rates (doubling times for each culture = 2.8 h) and comparable rates of H2S generation (D. orientis = 0.19 nmol/L S2–per cell per h; D. desulfuricans = 0.12 nmol/L S2–per cell per h). Transmission electron microscopy of whole mounts and thin sections revealed that the iron sulfide mineral precipitates produced by the two cultures were morphologically different. The D. orientis culture flocculated, with the minerals occurring as subhedral plate-like precipitates, which nucleated on the cell wall during exponential growth producing extensive mineral aggregates following cell autolysis and endospore release. In contrast, the D. desulfuricans culture produced fine-grained colloidal or platy iron sulfide precipitates primarily within the bulk solution. Mineral analysis by scanning electron microscopy – energy dispersive spectroscopy indicated that neither culture promoted advanced mineral development beyond a 1:1 Fe:S stoichiometry. This analysis did not detect pyrite (FeS2). The average Fe:S ratios were 1 : 1.09 ± 0.03 at 24 h and 1 : 1.08 ± 0.03 at 72 h for D. orientis and 1 : 1.05 ± 0.02 at 24 h and 1 : 1.09 ± 0.07 at 72 h for D. desulfuricans. The formation of “biogenic” iron sulfides by dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria is influenced by bacterial cell surface structure, chemistry, and growth strategy, i.e., mineral aggregation occurred with cell autolysis of the gram-positive bacterium.

Pyrite and the Global Environment

Pyrite ◽  
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Rickard
Keyword(s):  
Iron Sulfide ◽  
Sulfide Oxidation ◽  
Sulfate Reducing Bacteria ◽  
Sulfide Mineral ◽  
Sulfur Cycle ◽  
Sulfate Reducing ◽  
Global Dynamic ◽  
Sulfur Oxidizing ◽  
Life On Earth ◽  
Reducing Bacteria

The two basic processes concerning pyrite in the environment are the formation of pyrite, which usually involves reduction of sulfate to sulfide, and the destruction of pyrite, which usually involves oxidation of sulfide to sulfate. On an ideal planet these two processes might be exactly balanced. But pyrite is buried in sediments sometimes for hundreds of millions of years, and the sulfur in this buried pyrite is removed from the system, so the balance is disturbed. The lack of balance between sulfide oxidation and sulfate reduction powers a global dynamic cycle for sulfur. This would be complex enough if this were the whole story. However, as we have seen, both the reduction and oxidation arms of the global cycle are essentially biological—specifically microbiological—processes. This means that there is an intrinsic link between the sulfur cycle and life on Earth. In this chapter, we examine the central role that pyrite plays, and has played, in determining the surface environment of the planet. In doing so we reveal how pyrite, the humble iron sulfide mineral, is a key component of maintaining and developing life on Earth. In Chapter 4 we concluded that Mother Nature must be particularly fond of pyrite framboids: a thousand billion of these microscopic raspberry-like spheres are formed in sediments every second. If we translate this into sulfur production, some 60 million tons of sulfur is buried as pyrite in sediments each year. But this is only a fraction of the total amount of sulfide produced every year by sulfate-reducing bacteria. In 1982 the Danish geomicrobiologist Bo Barker Jørgensen discovered that as much as 90% of the sulfide produced by sulfate-reducing bacteria was rapidly reoxidized by sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms. Sulfate-reducing microorganisms actually produce about 300 million tons of sulfur each year, but about 240 million tons is reoxidized. The magnitude of the sulfide production by sulfate-reducing bacte­ria can be appreciated by comparison with the sulfur produced by volcanoes. As discussed in Chapter 5, it was previously supposed that all sulfur, and thus pyrite, had a volcanic origin. In fact volcanoes produce just 10 million tons of sulfur each year.

scholarly journals Improved Methodology for Bioremoval of Black Crusts on Historical Stone Artworks by Use of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria

2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 3733-3737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Cappitelli ◽  
Elisabetta Zanardini ◽  
Giancarlo Ranalli ◽  
Emilio Mello ◽  
Daniele Daffonchio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Microbial Activity ◽  
Iron Sulfide ◽  
Sulfate Reducing Bacteria ◽  
Desulfovibrio Vulgaris ◽  
Sulfate Reducing ◽  
Black Crusts ◽  
Reducing Bacteria ◽  
Cell Carriers

ABSTRACT An improved methodology to remove black crusts from stone by using Desulfovibrio vulgaris subsp. vulgaris ATCC 29579, a sulfate-reducing bacterium, is presented. The strain removed 98% of the sulfates of the crust in a 45-h treatment. Precipitation of black iron sulfide was avoided using filtration of a medium devoid of iron. Among three cell carriers, Carbogel proved to be superior to both sepiolite and Hydrobiogel-97, as it allowed an easy application of the bacteria, kept the system in a state where microbial activity was maintained, and allowed easy removal of the cells after the treatment.

scholarly journals Biogenic Iron Sulfide Nanoparticles to Enable Extracellular Electron Uptake in Sulfate‐Reducing Bacteria

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (15) ◽  
pp. 6051-6055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Deng ◽  
Naoshi Dohmae ◽  
Anna H. Kaksonen ◽  
Akihiro Okamoto
Keyword(s):  
Iron Sulfide ◽  
Sulfate Reducing Bacteria ◽  
Sulfate Reducing ◽  
Reducing Bacteria ◽  
Biogenic Iron
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document