scholarly journals Early definite stent thrombosis with everolimus‐eluting stents

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 854-857
Author(s):  
Ryo Naito ◽  
Katsumi Miyauchi ◽  
Hirokazu Konishi ◽  
Shuta Tsuboi ◽  
Shinya Okazaki ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2829
Author(s):  
Niels M. R. van der Sangen ◽  
Ho Yee Cheung ◽  
Niels J. W. Verouden ◽  
Yolande Appelman ◽  
Marcel A. M. Beijk ◽  
...  

Cangrelor is the first and only intravenous P2Y12-inhibitor and is indicated when (timely) administration of an oral P2Y12 inhibitor is not feasible in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Our study evaluated the first years of cangrelor use in two Dutch tertiary care centers. Cangrelor-treated patients were identified using a data-mining algorithm. The cumulative incidences of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis and major bleeding at 48 h and 30 days were assessed using Kaplan–Meier estimates. Predictors of 30-day mortality were identified using uni- and multivariable Cox regression models. Between March 2015 and April 2021, 146 patients (median age 63.7 years, 75.3% men) were treated with cangrelor. Cangrelor was primarily used in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients (84.2%). Approximately half required cardiopulmonary resuscitation (54.8%) or mechanical ventilation (48.6%). The cumulative incidence of all-cause death was 11.0% and 25.3% at 48 h and 30 days, respectively. Two cases (1.7%) of definite stent thrombosis, both resulting in myocardial infarction, occurred within 30 days, but after 48 h. No other cases of recurrent myocardial infarction transpired within 30 days. Major bleeding occurred in 5.6% and 12.5% of patients within 48 h and 30 days, respectively. Cardiac arrest at presentation was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 5.20, 95%-CI: 2.10–12.9, p < 0.01). Conclusively, cangrelor was used almost exclusively in STEMI patients undergoing PCI. Even though cangrelor was used in high-risk patients, its use was associated with a low rate of stent thrombosis.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
John A Bittl ◽  
Christopher D Lang

Introduction: Calculating the net benefit between bleeding risks and ischemic complications of antithrombotic therapy remains challenging. Hypothesis: Hierarchical meta-analyses may allow inferences to be made about the parameter θ, which reflects the underlying hypothesis that one therapy is superior to another conditional on the types of risks associated with various end points in clinical trials. Methods: We employed Bayesian hierarchical meta-analyses of 10 randomized clinical trials randomizing 34,658 patients to either bivalirudin or heparin, with or without platelet glycoprotein inhibitors, during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Results: No difference was seen in the rate of death 30 days after using bivalirudin or heparin (OR 1.01, 95% Bayesian credible interval [BCI] 0.79-1.28), but the risk of major bleeding was lower (OR 0.58, 95% BCI 0.38-0.84) and the risk of definite stent thrombosis (ST) was higher (OR 1.86, 95% BCI 1.19-2.94) after using bivalirudin than after using heparin. For every 100 patients, using bivalirudin in place of heparin prevented 4.1 episodes of major bleeding episodes but caused 0.8 episode of definite ST. (Figure Legend: Probability density functions normalized to 1 for risk of major bleeding, death and definite stent thrombosis at 30 days after treatment with bivalirudin or heparin, with or without platelet glycoprotein inhibitors.) Conclusions: Neither bivalirudin nor heparin emerges as a preferred strategy in an analysis that accounts for mortality differences. Because bivalirudin reduces major bleeding at the cost of increased stent thrombosis, decisions between bivalirudin and heparin based on baseline bleeding risk and ST risk are likely to maximize net clinical benefit.


2014 ◽  
Vol 175 (2) ◽  
pp. 274-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morten Würtz ◽  
Anne-Mette Hvas ◽  
Lisette O. Jensen ◽  
Anne K. Kaltoft ◽  
Hans H. Tilsted ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 263 ◽  
pp. 24-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura S. Kerkmeijer ◽  
Bimmer E. Claessen ◽  
Usman Baber ◽  
Samantha Sartori ◽  
Jaya Chandrasekhar ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (13) ◽  
pp. B295-B296
Author(s):  
Maria Tovar Forero ◽  
Thomas Zanchin ◽  
Kaneshka Masdjedi ◽  
laurens zandvoort ◽  
Felix Zijlstra ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. A209.E1974
Author(s):  
Marcelo Nakashima De Melo ◽  
Ricardo A Costa ◽  
J. Ribamar Costa ◽  
Fausto Feres ◽  
Alexandre Abizaid ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 591-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Thayssen ◽  
Lisette Jensen ◽  
Jens Lassen ◽  
Hans Tilsted ◽  
Anne Kaltoft ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. e31
Author(s):  
Aniket Puri ◽  
Micheal Liang ◽  
K.F. Kong ◽  
Z.H. Zhang ◽  
Scott Harding ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 567-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Lotfi ◽  
Jiang Cui ◽  
Siddharth Wartak ◽  
Jesse Columbo ◽  
Scott Mulvey ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Escribano ◽  
A Cordero ◽  
V Bertomeu-Gonzalez ◽  
J Moreno-Arribas ◽  
M Monteagudo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Polymer-free (PF) stents were designed as an alternative to durable-polymer (DP) drug-eluting stents to minimize the time on dual antiplatelet treatment for patients at high-risk of bleeding. Nonetheless, the efficacy and safety of PF vs. DP stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain controversial. Methods We performed a metanalysis with currently available studies that assessed the effect of PF-stents vs. DP-stents after performing a systematic search. The endpoints analyzed were all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and probable or definite stent thrombosis. The raw numbers of incident end-points reported in each study were used. We performed analyses in short and long term (&lt;1 or &gt;1 year follow-up) studies. Results We included 12464 patients from 8 studies (5 short-term and 3 long-term): 6723 treated with PF-stents and 5741 with DP stents. Females represented 23.3% (n=3284) and 33.7% (n=4202) were included in the setting of acute coronary syndromes. As shown in the figure, PF-stents were associated to lower incidence of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.91 95% CI 0.84–0.98; p=0.016) and TLR (HR: 0.88 95% CI 0.80–0.96; p=0.003). No differences were observed in the risk of cardiovascular death (HR: 0.96 95% CI 0.86–1.06 p=0.415), myocardial infarction (HR: 0.90 95% CI 0.80–1.01; p=0.061) or probable-definite stent thrombosis (HR: 0.92 95% CI 0.74–1.14; p=0.447). Finally, no differences in the primary end-point (HR: 0.92 95% CI 0.83–1.03; p=0.143) were detected with PF-stents vs. DP-stents. No significant heterogenicity was observed in any of the endpoints, except for the incidence of stent thrombosis. Conclusions Under current PCI techniques the use of PF-stent might be associated to better outcomes, especially in terms of all-cause mortality and TLR. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document