scholarly journals Effectiveness and biochemical basis of wholemeal GlutoPeak test in predicting water absorption and gluten strength of Canadian hard red spring wheat

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Wang ◽  
Jatinder Sangha ◽  
Richard Cuthbert ◽  
Bin Xiao Fu
Keyword(s):  
Water Absorption ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Gluten Strength ◽  
Biochemical Basis ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat

Exploring the influence of weather on gluten strength of hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) on the Canadian Prairies

2021 ◽  
pp. 103410
Author(s):  
Manasah Mkhabela ◽  
Paul Bullock ◽  
Harry Sapirstein ◽  
Janelle Courcelles ◽  
Soleiman Abbasi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Gluten Strength ◽  
Canadian Prairies ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat

AAC Bailey hard red spring wheat

2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. DePauw ◽  
R. E. Knox ◽  
R. D. Cuthbert ◽  
A. K. Singh ◽  
T. N. McCaig
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Gluten Strength ◽  
Loose Smut ◽  
Common Bunt ◽  
Head Blight ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Blight Disease ◽  
Moderate Resistance

DePauw, R. M., Knox, R. E., Cuthbert, R. D., Singh, A. K. and McCaig, T. N. 2014. AAC Bailey hard red spring wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 94: 175–181. AAC Bailey hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) had grain yield within the range of the checks with maturity significantly earlier than the mean of the checks. The quantity of protein of AAC Bailey was significantly less than Lillian but gluten strength was stronger than Lillian as measured by farinograph. AAC Bailey is eligible for grades of Canada Western Red Spring. AAC Bailey expressed resistance to prevalent races of leaf rust and stem rust, moderate resistance to common bunt, and moderate susceptibility to loose smut. AAC Bailey frequently had lower fusarium head blight disease index and lower deoxynivalenol concentration than Lillian and Laura.

Registration of ‘Duclair’ Hard Red Spring Wheat

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Lanning ◽  
G. R. Carlson ◽  
P. F. Lamb ◽  
D. Nash ◽  
D. M. Wichman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat

Hybrid Vigor in Hard Red Spring Wheat Crosses 1

Crop Science ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darrell. G. Wells ◽  
Charles L. Lay
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Hybrid Vigor ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat

Registration of Russian Wheat Aphid Resistant Hard Red Spring Wheat Germplasm

Crop Science ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1420-1420 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Lanning ◽  
L. E. Talbert ◽  
G. D. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Russian Wheat Aphid ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
Wheat Germplasm

scholarly journals Seeding Rate Effects on Hybrid Spring Wheat Yield, Yield Components and Quality

Agronomy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1240
Author(s):  
Peder K. Schmitz ◽  
Joel K. Ransom
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Yield Components ◽  
Wheat Yield ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Yield Component ◽  
Economic Feasibility ◽  
Protein Yield ◽  
Seeding Rate ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
End Use

Agronomic practices, such as planting date, seeding rate, and genotype, commonly influence hard red spring wheat (HRSW, Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.) production. Determining the agronomic optimum seeding rate (AOSR) of newly developed hybrids is needed as they respond to seeding rates differently from inbred cultivars. The objectives of this research were to determine the AOSR of new HRSW hybrids, how seeding rate alters their various yield components, and whether hybrids offer increased end-use quality, compared to conventional cultivars. The performance of two cultivars (inbreds) and five hybrids was evaluated in nine North Dakota environments at five seeding rates in 2019−2020. Responses to seeding rate for yield and protein yield differed among the genotypes. The AOSR ranged from 3.60 to 5.19 million seeds ha−1 and 2.22 to 3.89 million seeds ha−1 for yield and protein yield, respectively. The average AOSR for yield for the hybrids was similar to that of conventional cultivars. However, the maximum protein yield of the hybrids was achieved at 0.50 million seeds ha−1 less than that of the cultivars tested. The yield component that explained the greatest proportion of differences in yield as seeding rates varied was kernels spike−1 (r = 0.17 to 0.43). The end-use quality of the hybrids tested was not superior to that of the conventional cultivars, indicating that yield will likely be the determinant of the economic feasibility of any future released hybrids.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document