Radial artery occlusion after conventional and distal radial access: Impact of preserved flow and time‐to‐hemostasis in a propensity‐score matching analysis of 1163 patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Pacchioni ◽  
Antonio Mugnolo ◽  
Jorge Sanz Sanchez ◽  
Gregory A. Sgueglia ◽  
Gabriele Pesarini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Comparison of different access sites (radial, brachial and femoral) for subclavian artery intervention

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Z Ruzsa ◽  
N Sandor ◽  
J Toth ◽  
M Deak ◽  
B Zafirovska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radial Artery ◽  
Subclavian Artery ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Access Site Complication ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Angiographic Data ◽  
Procedural Complications ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Abstract Introduction The primary purpose of this multicenter prospective register was to evaluate the success and complication rate of different access sites for subclavian artery intervention. Secondary purpose was to investigate the safety of the distal radial artery access for subclavian artery intervention. Methods The clinical and angiographic data of 223 consecutive patients with symptomatic subclavian and anonym artery stenosis treated via transradial (TR), transbrachial (TB) and transfemoral (TF) access between 2015 and 2019 were evaluated in a multicenter registry. The exclusion criteria of the intervention was the acute proximal subclavian artery thrombosis. Primary endpoint: angiographic outcome of the subclavian and anonym artery intervention, rate of major and minor access site complications. Secondary endpoints: procedural complications, consumption of the angioplasty equipment, cross over rate to another puncture site and hospitalization in days. Results The procedure was successful in 182/184 in TR, in 5/5 in TB and in 32/32 patients in TF group. The cross over rate in the TR, TB and TF group was 0%. Chronic total occlusion recanalization was successful in 75/77 cases in TR, and 15/15 cases in the TF group. Contrast consumption was 152±106 ml in TR, 99±22.5 ml in TB and 152±95 in TF group, respectively (p=ns). Cummulativ dose was 602±1205 mGray in RA, 455±210 mGray in BA and 1089±1674 mGray in FA group (p<0.05). Procedural complications occurred in 1/184 (0.5%) case in RA group, in 0 case (0%) in BA group and in 4/32 cases (12.5%) in the FA group (p<0.05). Major access site complication were detected in 3 patients (1.6%) in RA, in 1 patient in BA (20%) and in 1 patient in FA group (3.1%) (p<0.05). Minor access site complication were encountered in 9 patients in the RA (4.8%), in 1 patient in the BA (20%) and in 8 patients in the FA group (25%) (p<0.05). Distal radial access was used in 29 cases and proximal radial access in 155 patients. The rate of radial artery occlusion in proximal and distal radial group was 5.1% and 0% (p<0.05). Conclusions Subclavian artery intervention can be safely and effectively performed using radial access with acceptable morbidity and high technical success. Femoral and brachial access is associated with more access site complications than radial artery access. Distal radial access is associated with less radial artery occlusion than proximal radial artery access. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Feasibility of Distal Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Single Center Experience

Cardiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Lianna Xie ◽  
Xianjing Wei ◽  
Zezhou Xie ◽  
Shengying Jia ◽  
Siwei Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radial Artery ◽  
Interventional Procedure ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Artery Cannulation ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> Asymptomatic radial artery occlusion remains the most common complication in transradial coronary interventional procedure. To prevent radial artery occlusion, distal transradial access (dTRA) has been suggested recently. In this article, we aim to describe our experience and to assess feasibility and safety of this new access site for routine coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospective analyzed 1,063 consecutive patients who were assigned to undergo CAG or procedural PCI through dTRA between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019 at Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University. The size of radial sheath used was 5 or 6 French. The sheath was removed at procedure termination, and hemostasis was obtained by compression bandage with gauze. The success rate of dTRA access defined by successful radial artery cannulation on the first dTRA side attempted, the cause of access failure, the hemostasis duration, the incidence of post-catheterization radial artery occlusion, and the other access-related complications including hematoma of forearm and thumb numbness were assessed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Radial artery cannulation via dTRA was successful in 953 of 1,063 patients with a success rate of 89.7%. Mean age of successful cases was 64.6 ± 11.2 years (26–94 years) with 339 (35.6%) women. A total of 363 (38.1%) cases were PCI. Among them, 95 cases (10%) underwent urgent PCI, including primary PCI in 64 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and immediate PCI (&#x3c;2 h from hospital admission) in 31 patients with very high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. A total of 269 (28.2%) cases were via left dTRA. The 6 French sheath was used in 602 (63.2%) cases. Hemostasis was obtained within 2 h in 853 (89.5%) patients. There were 110 (10.3%) procedural failures: 59 (5.6%) cases of artery puncture failure, 49 (4.9%) cases of guide wire insertion failure, and 2 (0.2%) cases of sheath insertion failure. Complications potentially related to distal radial access included radial artery occlusion at the access site (13 cases, 1.4%), forearm radial artery occlusion (4 cases, 0.4%), hematoma of forearm (5 cases, 0.5%), and transient thumb numbness (2 cases, 0.2%). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> dTRA is a feasible and safe access and can be used as a rational alternative to traditional radial access for routine coronary interventional procedure.

Abstract 13877: Comparison of Incidence of Radial Artery Occlusion in Patients Undergoing Trans-radial Intervention With or Without a Sheath: A Prospective Cohort Study

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghanshyam Palamaner Subash Shantha ◽  
Samir B Pancholy
Keyword(s):  
Radial Artery ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Diabetes Diagnosis ◽  
Introducer Sheath ◽  
Effect Modifier ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Introduction: Sheathless transradial access, by decreasing the profile of hardware, is expected to lower the incidence of radial artery occlusion (RAO). Hypothesis: We sought to compare the risk of RAO in patients undergoing coronary intervention with introducer sheath (SG) or without introducer sheath (SLG). Methods: 1251 consecutive patients undergoing 6 French percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013 in Scranton, PA, formed the study cohort. Radial artery patency was assessed using reverse Barbeau’s test and RAO was confirmed by ultrasonography. Unadjusted, adjusted and propensity matched association between type of radial access (SG vs SLG) and RAO were assessed using logistic regression analysis. Results: Mean age was 65 years, 63% were men 37% were diabetics. 78% attained patent hemostasis (PH). Patients in SG had lower pre-discharge RAO [unadjusted (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.21 - 0.46, P < 0.001), adjusted (OR: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.05 - 0.20, P < 0.001) and propensity matched (OR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.13 - 0.32, P < 0.001)], 24 hours RAO [unadjusted (OR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.12 - 0.34, P < 0.001), adjusted (OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.06 - 0.24, P < 0.001) and propensity matched (OR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.25, P < 0.001)] and 30 day RAO [unadjusted (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.14 - 0.54, P < 0.001), adjusted (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.10 - 0.50, P < 0.001) and propensity matched (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10 - 0.40, P < 0.001)], compared to those in SLG. Spontaneous recanalization rates were significantly higher in SG compared to SLG at 24 hours (62% Vs 38%, P = 0.007) but similar at 30 days (38% Vs 50%, P = 0.338) post PCI. Diabetes diagnosis was an effect modifier for RAO at pre-discharge, 24 hours and 30 days post PCI. Conclusions: Sheath use during radial access for PCI, despite diametrically increasing hardware profile, is associated with less RAO, likely by reducing friction induced intimal trauma. Diabetes is an effect modifier in this association.

Radial Artery Occlusion With Distal Radial Access Compared to Conventional Transradial Access

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 1043
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Sgueglia ◽  
Angelo Santoliquido ◽  
Achille Gaspardone ◽  
Angela Di Giorgio
Keyword(s):  
Radial Artery ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Transradial Access ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

scholarly journals Radial Artery Access

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmelo Panetta ◽  
Johnny Chahine
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Research ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Ulnar Artery ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
New Techniques ◽  
Radial Approach ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Radial artery access for angiography has matured over the past two decades and is now the preferred point of access for most patients. Lower bleeding rates in clinical randomized trials have translated into lower mortality prompting change in the guidelines. Advances in technique with use of ultrasound for access to properly size the sheath, proper dosing of anticoagulation and new techniques for sheath removal have dramatically lowered radial artery occlusion rates. Radial artery spasm has improved with vasodilators and proper sedation. Advances in support boards and sheath extension have opened up left radial access. Advances in lower profile sheaths and sheathless systems allow larger catheters in smaller arteries. Advances in longer balloons and sheaths have opened up radial access for peripheral interventions. Areas of clinical research include use of ulnar artery compared to radial, left versus right radial access, use of radial artery for a surgical conduit after angiography, radiation exposure and advantage of radial approach in the elderly.

scholarly journals Evaluation of radial artery occlusion in patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic coronary procedures via distal radial access. A retrospective observational study (RDISTAL DOR)

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Marden Tebet ◽  
Mickael Ogama ◽  
Sergio Kreimer ◽  
Eduardo Santos ◽  
Pedro Andrade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Vascular Complication ◽  
Medical Community ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Coronary Procedures ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Background: The use of the distal radial access for invasive coronary procedures has been rapidly adopted by the medical community, but with no evaluation of efficacy and safety outcomes of this approach. The objective was to evaluate the rate of radial artery occlusion involved in this technique, using Doppler ultrasound. Methods: This was an observational, retrospective study involving patients undergoing invasive diagnostic or therapeutic coronary procedures via distal radial access, with assessment of the radial artery patency by Doppler ultrasound. The primary outcome analyzed was the rate of radial artery occlusion. Results: Between July and December 2020, 51 patients underwent procedures via distal radial access, with assessment of the radial artery patency, out of a total of 603 patients seen during this period. Patients were aged 58±10.8 years, 68.6% were male, 26.9% had diabetes mellitus, and 68.6% were diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome. Diagnostic procedures were performed in 68.2% of sample, and 23.5% of patients had undergone a previous use of the ipsilateral proximal radial access. Doppler ultrasound was performed over a mean period of 24 hours, and no occlusion of the radial artery was observed, with mean time for sheath insertion of 1.9 minutes. There was no major vascular complication. In two patients, pain was observed at the access point; another two had a small subcutaneous hematoma, and, one patient, presented with moderate spasm. Conclusion: The use of distal radial access was associated with a low rate of hemorrhagic complications in the access route, and absence of occlusion of the radial artery by Doppler ultrasound assessment.

scholarly journals Analysis of radial artery occlusion causes and methods of its prevention after interventions using radial access. Results of the APRIORI study

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 4695
Author(s):  
D. V. Ognerubov ◽  
S. I. Provatorov ◽  
E. V. Merkulov ◽  
A. S. Merkulov ◽  
K. I. Kupina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Antihypertensive Agents ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Interventional Treatment ◽  
Female Sex ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion ◽  
Group 2

Aim. To study predictors of radial artery occlusion (RAO) and ways to prevent it after interventions using radial access.Material and methods. The study consisted of prospective and retrospective parts. The total number of included patients was 2284. Patients undergoing interventions by radial access in various medical organizations were retrospectively considered. The prospective study included 1284 patients who were subject to interventional treatment. Patients were randomized into two groups as follows: in group 1, hemostasis was performed within 4 hours, in group 2 — >6 hours. All patients underwent a bedside Barbeau test with a pulse oximeter and an ultrasound of access arteries to determine the radial artery patency/occlusion.Results. The RAO rate in the retrospective part was 21,8%, while in the prospective one — 10,1% with long-term hemostasis and 1,4% with short-term hemostasis (p<0,001). Predictors of RAO were type 2 diabetes (odds ratio (OR), 1,9, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1,1-3,4, p=0,03) and an increase in hemostasis duration by 1 hour (OR, 1,2, 95% CI, 1,1-1,3, p<0,001). When analyzing the retrospective part, the predictors of RAO were body mass index (OR, 1,06, 95% CI, 1,02-1,09, p=0,002), female sex (OR, 0,6, 95% CI, 0,4-0,9, p=0,02), smoking (OR, 1,38, 95% CI, 1-1,91, p=0,047). The administration of statins in different dosages, as well as antihypertensive and anti-ischemic agents, did not have a significant effect on the RAO rate.Conclusion. The main predictors of RAO were type 2 diabetes, an increase in hemostasis duration, female sex, smoking, and the artery-to-introducer diameter ratio. Taking statins, anti-ischemic and antihypertensive agents does not have a protective effect on RAO rate.

Safety and efficacy of different arterial pressure bandages following percutaneous coronary interventions from radial access: preliminary data of the RAD-PRESS trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Nemeth ◽  
F Nowotta ◽  
Z Ruzsa ◽  
T Szuk ◽  
D Becker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radial Artery ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Interventions ◽  
Puncture Site ◽  
Hematoma Formation ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Compression Time ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Abstract Background The overwhelming majority of diagnostic coronary angiographies and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are performed via radial access as recommended by the current European revascularization guidelines. Using dedicated pressure bandages for the radial access site in high-volume centres can be a significant part of the budget of catheterization laboratories, therefore we developed a cost-effective pressure bandage utilizing wrapped empty glass vials of intravenous medications. Furthermore, compression time of the radial puncture site following PCI is a predictor of radial artery occlusion, therefore shortening the period of compression to as short as possible is feasible. Purpose Our aim was to validate efficacy and safety of our cost-effective pressure bandage by comparing it to two dedicated devices, as well as reducing length of compression to as short as possible. Methods We designed the RAD-PRESS trial, major inclusion criteria of which were first puncture of a radial artery with a diameter greater than 1.8mm, PCI performed as per guidelines utilizing a 6 French guiding catheter and age below 80 years. Patients were then randomized to receive one of three pressure bandages: the glass vial, Seal-One or the gold standard TR-band. Release of pressure was performed as fast as possible in 10-minute steps, and guided by pulse oximetry. Hematoma formation was thoroughly checked for all patients and categorized using the Easy scale. Radial artery patency was investigated by ultrasound 24 hours after final removal of the bandage. The data of 40 patients of every group was analysed. Results Population characteristics were similar among the groups. Length of compression time (126±10, 142±11 and 144±11 mins for Vial, Seal-One and TR-band, respectively, p&gt;0.05), hematoma formation (Easy Grade 1 in 17.5%, 15.0% and 10.0%, Easy Grade 2 in 5.0%, 7.5% and 7.5% for Vial, Seal-One and TR-band, respectively, all p&gt;0.05) were not significantly different among the groups. Radial artery occlusion occurred in only 2 patients (Vial and TR-Band groups), accounting for 1.7% of the cases. Conclusions The cost-effective wrapped vial strategy to compress the radial puncture site was comparable to both Seal-One and the gold standard TR-band regarding safety and efficacy. Furthermore, compression time could be safely shortened to approximately 2.5 hours. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document