Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect in elderly patients with permanent atrial fibrillation

2009 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 682-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manabu Taniguchi ◽  
Teiji Akagi ◽  
Shinichi Ohtsuki ◽  
Yoshio Okamoto ◽  
Yasuharu Tanabe ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Hwa Kong ◽  
Jinyoung Song ◽  
Kyung Hee Kim ◽  
June Huh ◽  
I-Seok Kang

<strong>Background:</strong> Acute changes in left ventricular diastolic function shortly after ASD closure in elderly patients have not been well known. We aimed to investigate acute changes in left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in elderly patients following transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD). <br /><strong>Methods:</strong> All 19 adults with ASDs who underwent transcatheter closure between June 2013 and December 2014 were enrolled. LVEDP was measured prior to device closure and compared with that immediately following device closure and 15 minutes after device closure. <br /><strong>Results:</strong> The median age of the patients was 48 years old. The baseline E/e’ and LVEDP values were 8.3 ± 2.8 and 13 ± 3 mmHg. The LVEDP value immediately following closure was 19 ± 4 mmHg, and 15 minutes after closure was 16 ± 4 mmHg. The median increase in the LVEDP value immediately following closure was 6 mmHg, which significantly differed from that prior to closure. The LVEDP 15 minutes after closure decreased but remained significantly higher than the value observed immediately after closure. No significant changes were observed with regard to E/e’ at either 1 day or 3 months following closure. The LVEDP value <br />15 minutes after device closure was significantly correlated with those observed before closure and immediately following closure; however, no significant correlations were observed with regard to patient age, Qp/Qs, E/e’ before closure, or E/e’ 3 months after device closure.<br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> LVEDP in adults with ASDs significantly increases following device closure. LVEDP before closure predicts LVEDP following device closure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 1252-1257
Author(s):  
Ming Chern Leong ◽  
Geetha Kandavello ◽  
Azlan Husin ◽  
Deventhiren Perumal ◽  
Surinder Kaur Khelae

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P.J Prochownik ◽  
T Przewlocki ◽  
B Sobien ◽  
U Gancarczyk ◽  
M Olszowska ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Closure of the atrial septal defect in the elderly patients is controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) in elderly patients. Methods From a total of 650 pts with ASD who underwent transcatheter closure 120 pts over 60 years (70 F, 50 M) with a mean age of 66.7±18.1 (60–78) were analyzed. All patients had an isolated secundum ASD with a mean Qp:Qs: 2.79±1.8 (1.5–3.9). A symptom-limited treadmill exercise tests with respiratory gas exchange analysis and transthoracic color Doppler echocardiographic study as well as Quality of life (QoL) measured using the SF36 questionnaire (SF36q) were repeated in all pts before procedure and after 12 months of follow-up. Results The device was successfully implanted in all pts (procedure time 30.1±9.9 (10–59) minutes, fluoroscopy time 10.1±7.2 (6–40) minutes). There were no major complications. The defect echo diameter was 19.5±15.4 (12 - 34) mm. The mean balloon stretched diameter of ASD was 22.0±7.8 (14 - 36) mm. The diameter of the implanted devices ranged 16 - 38 mm. After 12 months of ASD closure, all the pts showed a significant improvement of exercise capacity parameters. Seven QoL parameters (except mental health) improved at 12 months follow up compared to their baseline data. The mean SF36q scale increased significantly in 96 (80.2%) pts of mean 41.6±26.1 (4–71). The right ventricular dimension decreased in 101 pts (84.2%) (Table 1). Conclusions Closure of ASD in elderly patients caused a significant clinical and hemodynamic improvement after percutaneous treatment, which is maintained to long-term follow-up what justified this procedure in old age. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2006 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. S52-S52
Author(s):  
M PIECULEWICZ ◽  
P PODOLEC ◽  
T PRZEWLOCKI ◽  
M HLAWATY ◽  
P WILKOLEK ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Gianluca Rigatelli ◽  
Marco Zuin ◽  
Loris Roncon ◽  
Aravinda Nanjiundappa

Abstract Introduction: Technologically, advances in both transcatheter and surgical techniques have been continuing in the past 20 years, but an updated comprehensive comparison in device-based versus surgery in adults in terms of incidence of in-hospital mortality, perioperative stroke, and atrial fibrillation onset is still lacking. We investigate the performance of transcatheter device-based closure compared to surgical techniques by a systematic review and meta-analysis of the last 20 years literature data. Material and methods: The analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Literature search was performed based on Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Google Scholar to locate articles published between January 2000 and October 2020, regarding the comparison between short-term outcome and post-procedural complications of atrial septal defect patients receiving transcatheter or surgical closure. The primary outcome was the comparison of in-hospital mortality from all causes between patients treated with transcatheter closure or cardiac. Secondary outcomes were the onset of post-procedural atrial fibrillation or perioperative stroke. Results: A total of 2360 patients were included of which 1393 [mean age 47.6 years, 952 females (68.3%)] and 967 [mean age 40.3 years, 693 females (71.6%)] received a transcatheter device-based and surgery closure, respectively. In-hospital mortality [OR 0.16 (95% CI (0.66−0.44)), p = 0.0003, I2 = 0%], perioperative stroke [OR 0.51 (95% CI (0.31−0.84)), p = 0.003, I2 = 79%], and post-procedural atrial fibrillation [OR 0.14 (95% CI (0.03−0.61)), p = 0.009, I2 = 0%] significantly favoured transcatheter device-based closure Conclusion: Transcatheter atrial septal defect closure resulted safer in terms of in-hospital mortality, perioperative stroke, and post-procedural atrial fibrillation compared to traditional surgery.


Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2021-319794
Author(s):  
Jonah Daniel Himelfarb ◽  
Healey Shulman ◽  
Christopher James Olesovsky ◽  
Rawan K Rumman ◽  
Laura Oliva ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) is among the most common congenital cardiac anomalies diagnosed in adulthood. A known complication of transcatheter ASD closure is the development of new-onset atrial fibrillation and flutter (AFi/AFl). These arrhythmias confer an increased risk of postoperative stroke, thrombus formation and systemic emboli. This systematic review examines the burden of de novo AFi/AFl in adults following transcatheter closure and seeks to identify risk factors for AFi/AFl development.MethodsStudies were identified by a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from inception until 29 April 2020. A meta-analysis of AFi/AFl incidence was performed using a random-effects model.ResultsA total of 31 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 4788 adult patients without a history of AFi/AFl. Twenty-three studies were included in quantitative synthesis and demonstrated an overall incidence rate of 1.82 patients per 100 person-years of follow-up (I2=83%). In studies that enrolled only patients ≥60 years old, the incidence was 5.21 patients per 100 person-years (I2=0%). Studies with follow-up duration ≤2 years reported an incidence of 4.05 per 100 person-years (I2=55%) compared with a rate of 1.19 per 100 person-years (I2=85%) for studies with follow-up duration >2 years.ConclusionsThe incidence of new-onset AFi/AFl is relatively low following transcatheter closure of secundum ASDs. The rate of de novo AFi/AFl, however, was significantly higher in elderly patients. Shorter follow-up time was associated with a higher reported incidence of AFi/AFl.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document