Impact of contrast agent type (ionic versus nonionic) used for coronary angiography on angiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical outcomes following thrombolytic administration in acute myocardial infarction

2001 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Michael Gibson ◽  
Ajay J. Kirtane ◽  
Sabina A. Murphy ◽  
Susan J. Marble ◽  
James A. de Lemos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Contrast Agent ◽  
Clinical Outcomes

scholarly journals CHALLENGES IN TREATING HEMODIALYSIS-DEPENDENT PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. A СLINICAL CASE

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-142
Author(s):  
D. Yu. Sedykh ◽  
L. Yu. Chesnokova ◽  
V. V. Kashtalap ◽  
S. V. Kirilenko ◽  
O. L. Barbarash
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Contrast Agent ◽  
Unfractionated Heparin ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Clinical Case ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents

The clinical case reports a personalized expert approach to the management of a patient with myocardial infarction receiving programmed hemodialysis. The challenges facing by cardiologists with antiplatelet therapy, statin therapy, betablockers and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers as basic therapy have been discussed. The experience of performing coronary angiography with a limited dosage of the contrast agent followed by the stenting in the patient intolerant to unfractionated heparin is presented The complexity of post-puncture hemostasis before dialysis is highlighted. A particular attention has been paid to the existing difficulties in selecting rational loading doses of antiplatelet agents for these patients due to poor evidences on the elimination of clopidogrel metabolites from the blood flow.

Is coronary angiography performed in the appropriate patients after acute myocardial infarction?

2003 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy DE GEVIGNEY ◽  
Muriel RABILLOUD ◽  
René ÉCOCHARD ◽  
Eugène McFADDEN ◽  
Ludovic MEUNIER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Angiography

scholarly journals Effects of stent generation on clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction compared between prediabetes and diabetes patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Hoon Kim ◽  
Ae-Young Her ◽  
Myung Ho Jeong ◽  
Byeong-Keuk Kim ◽  
Sung-Jin Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Diabetes Group ◽  
Repeat Revascularization ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Diabetes Patients

AbstractWe investigated the effects of stent generation on 2-year clinical outcomes between prediabetes and diabetes patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A total of 13,895 AMI patients were classified into normoglycemia (group A: 3673), prediabetes (group B: 5205), and diabetes (group C: 5017). Thereafter, all three groups were further divided into first-generation (1G)-drug-eluting stent (DES) and second-generation (2G)-DES groups. Patient-oriented composite outcomes (POCOs) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), and any repeat revascularization were the primary outcome. Stent thrombosis (ST) was the secondary outcome. In both prediabetes and diabetes groups, the cumulative incidences of POCOs, any repeat revascularization, and ST were higher in the 1G-DES than that in the 2G-DES. In the diabetes group, all-cause death and cardiac death rates were higher in the 1G-DES than that in the 2G-DES. In both stent generations, the cumulative incidence of POCOs was similar between the prediabetes and diabetes groups. However, in the 2G-DES group, the cumulative incidences of Re-MI and all-cause death or MI were significantly higher in the diabetes group than that in the prediabetes group. To conclude, 2G-DES was more effective than 1G-DES in reducing the primary and secondary outcomes for both prediabetes and diabetes groups.

scholarly journals Admission biomarkers among patients with acute myocardial-infarction related cardiogenic shock with or without out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Thoegersen ◽  
M Frydland ◽  
O Helgestad ◽  
LO Jensen ◽  
J Josiassen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Endothelial Damage ◽  
Soluble Thrombomodulin ◽  
Catheterization Laboratory ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Lundbeck Foundation OnBehalf Critical Cardiac Care Research Group Background Approximately half of all patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) present with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Cardiogenic shock due to OHCA is caused by abrupt cessation of circulation, whereas AMICS without OHCA is due to cardiac failure with low cardiac output. Thus, there may also be differences between the two conditions in terms of blood borne biomarkers. Purpose To explore the potential differences in the admission plasma concentrations of biomarkers reflecting tissue perfusion (lactate), neuroendocrine response (mid-regional proadrenomedullin [MRproADM], Copeptin, pro-atrial natriuretic peptide [proANP]), endothelial damage (Syndecan-1, soluble thrombomodulin [sTM]), inflammation (soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 [sST2]) and kidney injury (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL]), in patients with AMICS presenting with or without OHCA. Method Consecutive patients admitted for acute coronary angiography due to suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were enrolled during a 1-year period. A total of 2,713 patients were screened. In the present study 86 patients with confirmed STEMI and CS at admission were included. Results Patients with OHCA (had significantly higher median admission concentrations of Lactate (6,9 mmol/L vs. 3.4 mmol/L p <0.001), NGAL (220 ng/ml  vs 150 ng/ml p = 0.046), sTM (10 ng/ml vs. 8.0  ng/ml p = 0.026) and Syndecan-1 (160 ng/ml vs. 120 ng/ml p= 0.015) and significantly lower concentrations of MR-proADM (0.85 nmol/L  vs. 1.6 nmol/L p <0.001) and sST2 (39 ng/ml vs. 62 ng/ml p < 0.001).  After adjusting for age, sex, and time from symptom onset to coronary angiography, lactate (p = 0.008), NGAL (p = 0.03) and sTM (p = 0.011) were still significantly higher in patients presenting with OHCA while sST2 was still significantly lower (p = 0.029). There was very little difference in 30-day mortality between the OHCA and non-OHCA groups (OHCA 37% vs. non-OHCA 38%). Conclusion Patients with STEMI and CS at admission with or without concomitant OHCA had similar 30-day mortality but differed in terms of Lactate, NGAL, sTM and sST2 levels at the time of admission to catheterization laboratory. These findings propose that non-OHCA and OHCA patients with CS could be considered as two individual clinical entities. Abstract Figure. Level of biomarkers OHCA vs. non-OHCA

scholarly journals Impact of immune thrombocytopenic purpura on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-59
Author(s):  
Omar Chehab ◽  
Nadine Abdallah ◽  
Amjad Kanj ◽  
Mohit Pahuja ◽  
Oluwole Adegbala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura ◽  
Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document