What are the benefits and harms of PARP inhibitors in women with ovarian cancer?

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Mocellin
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Parp Inhibitors

scholarly journals Tumour Versus Germline BRCA Testing in Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Site Institution Experience in the United Kingdom

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 547
Author(s):  
Iolia Akaev ◽  
Siavash Rahimi ◽  
Olubukola Onifade ◽  
Francis John Edward Gardner ◽  
David Castells-Rufas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Unknown Origin ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Serous Carcinoma ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Epithelial Cancers ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Pathogenic Mutations

The aim of this audit was to evaluate the usefulness and serviceability of testing for pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genes in ovarian cancer (OC) patients. One hundred and thirty-five patients with more common histological sub-types of OC were retrospectively identified between 2011 and 2019. The fail rate of the molecular analysis was 7.4% (10/135). One hundred and twenty-five records were evaluated: 99 (79.2%) patients had wild-type BRCA (both somatic and germline); tumour BRCA1/2 (tBRCA1/2) pathogenic mutations were found in 20 (16%) patients with distribution between BRCA1 and BRCA2 being 40% and 60%, respectively; 13 (10.4%) patients with pathogenic variants had germline mutations; and tBRCA1/2 with variant of unknown significance (VUS), in the absence of pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants, was detected in 6 (4.8%) patients. Our data show that expanding the molecular service to the routine first-tumour testing for patients with OC will potentially increase the detection rate of BRCA mutations, thereby providing early benefits of PARP inhibitors therapy. The tumour testing service should continue to be offered to newly diagnosed patients with high-grade epithelial cancers, including high-grade serous carcinoma, but also with carcinosarcomas and poorly-differentiated metastatic adenocarcinomas of unknown origin.

scholarly journals Differences in PARP Inhibitors for the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: Mechanisms of Action, Pharmacology, Safety, and Efficacy

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 4203
Author(s):  
Giorgio Valabrega ◽  
Giulia Scotto ◽  
Valentina Tuninetti ◽  
Arianna Pani ◽  
Francesco Scaglione
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Signal Transduction ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Chemical Structure ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Mechanisms Of Action ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Properties

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARP) are proteins responsible for DNA damage detection and signal transduction. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are able to interact with the binding site for PARP cofactor (NAD+) and trapping PARP on the DNA. In this way, they inhibit single-strand DNA damage repair. These drugs have been approved in recent years for the treatment of ovarian cancer. Although they share some similarities, from the point of view of the chemical structure and pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic properties, these drugs also have some substantial differences. These differences may underlie the different safety profiles and activity of PARPi.

PARP inhibitors decrease response to subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with BRCA mutated ovarian cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter G. Rose ◽  
Meng Yao ◽  
Laura M. Chambers ◽  
Haider Mahdi ◽  
Robert DeBernardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

scholarly journals Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison J Wiggans ◽  
Gemma KS Cass ◽  
Andrew Bryant ◽  
Theresa A Lawrie ◽  
Jo Morrison
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Parp Inhibitors

Laboratory cross-comparison of homologous recombination repair mutation analysis in tumor in a multicenter epithelial ovarian cancer series: The BORNEO GEICO 60-0 study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17550-e17550
Author(s):  
Ignacio Romero ◽  
Ana Oaknin ◽  
Zaida Garcia-Casado ◽  
Raul Marquez ◽  
Alfonso Yubero Esteban ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Homologous Recombination Repair ◽  
Recombination Repair ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Uncertain Significance

e17550 Background: In epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), the identification of mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes on tumor is prognostic, predictive of response to PARP inhibitors, and a tool to identify individuals at genetic cancer risk. The aim of this study is to compare the concordance between two laboratories in identifying and classifying genetic variants in HRR genes. Methods: In a multicentre ambispective series of unselected, non mucinous EOC of all stages formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tumors were collected. These samples underwent the same mutational analysis of 15 HRR genes ( ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCL, PALB2, PPP2R2A, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, RAD54L) in two different Laboratories (Lab1, Lab2) that used their own validated multi-gene NGS panels. Variant allele frequency (VAF) threshold was 5% for single nucleotide polymorphism and 10% for indels. Large rearrangements were not analyzed. Variants were classified into three categories based on ACMG criteria: non-mutated (class 1-2), Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS: class 3) and likely pathogenic/pathogenic (class 4-5). Results: A total of 81 cases were sent for the analysis. One had low DNA quality and therefore 80 cases were finally studied (85% high grade serous and 74% FIGO stage III-IV). Results reported by Lab1 and Lab2 (lab1/Lab2) were the following: 21/19 (26%/24%) cases had BRCA1/2 mutations, 7/8 (8.7%/10%) mutations on other HRR genes including two in ATM and RAD51D, one in CHEK1, CHEK2, and FANCL and one RAD51C reported in Lab2 only while the rest were either VUS 23/27 (29%/34%) or non-mutated 29/26 (36%/33%). Concordance between laboratories in classifying patients was 93.75% (kappa coefficient 0.86). Discrepancies (DC) on variants were classified into arbitrary categories, namely 0= complete concordance, category 1 meaning DC in detection assumed to be due to tumor heterogeneity (VAF nearby the threshold) or technique (1A), or caused by laboratories performance and avoidable (1B) and the category 2 identified DC in interpretation without clinical relevance (2A) or clinically relevant (2B), the results of total number of variants are shown in table. Overall, regarding clinically relevant DC in HRR genes, 9 DC in variants were observed including six 2B, two 1A and one 1B and they affect 5 (6.3%) patients since some were overlapping. Conclusions: In our EOC series the concordance of two Laboratories in the identification of clinically relevant HRR mutations on tumor is high but discrepancies in interpretation remain a challenge that needs further harmonization.[Table: see text]

Emerging molecular alterations leading to histology-specific targeted therapies in ovarian cancer beyond PARP inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. 102298
Author(s):  
M. Bartoletti ◽  
L. Musacchio ◽  
G. Giannone ◽  
V. Tuninetti ◽  
A. Bergamini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Molecular Alterations
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document